What is the maximum number of judges?

Answer:

Veto.

Explanation:

Its like an 3rd grade thing they should ask you?

Not trying to be rude btw

Answer:

Veto

Explanation:

When a president dosent like a law they can veto it. But congress can override the veto if two- thirds agree on it.

Your welcome!

Among the options provided, the policy that would be considered a strong affirmative action policy is using diversity or underrepresentation of groups with a history of past discrimination as a tiebreaker when candidates for goods and offices are relatively equal.

Affirmative action laws are intended to combat past or present discrimination and advance equal opportunities for disadvantaged or underrepresented groups. These laws seek to offset the effects of past or present discrimination by giving those who have encountered structural obstacles more assistance or preferential treatment.

When candidates for goods like job positions or educational opportunities or offices are equally qualified, using diversity or underrepresentation as a tiebreaker means that people from underrepresented or disadvantaged groups would be given preference. This addresses the underrepresentation of marginalized groups in various fields and contributes to the creation of a more diverse and inclusive environment.

Learn more about Affirmative action at:

brainly.com/question/1163395

#SPJ4

Part of the increase in disability discrimination complaints to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is caused by various factors or reasons.

The increase in disability discrimination complaints can be attributed to several factors. One significant factor is the growing awareness and advocacy for disability rights, which has encouraged individuals to come forward and report instances of discrimination. Additionally, changes in societal attitudes and legal frameworks have made it easier for individuals to recognize and address instances of disability discrimination.

The EEOC's efforts to promote equal employment opportunities and enforce anti-discrimination laws have also played a role in encouraging individuals to file complaints. It is important to note that the specific reasons behind the increase may vary and may include a combination of factors.

You can learn more about discrimination at

https://brainly.com/question/29546599

#SPJ11

Answer:

A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)

Explanation:

Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation. Therefore, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.

When someone uses libel law as a weapon to prevent speech from occurring, it is generally referred to as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP).

This ultimately implies that, a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a type of injunction obtained by a party, so as to intimidate, censor and silence activists, perceived enemies or critics based on slander, libel, defamation, interference, abuse of power etc. It typically involves a huge amount of money to defend a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP)and as such, it used to buy time away from a litigation.

True, According to a source, the statement “When Nasser reaches 21 he can ask the court to void the guarantee contract”.

A guarantee contract is a contract in which a third party, known as the guarantor or surety, promises to perform or discharge the liability of another person in case of their default which is also known as a contract of surety. The principal debtor, the creditor, and the surety are the three parties involved in a guaranteed contract.

The person who borrows or is liable to pay and on whose default the guarantee is given is known as the principal debtor. The party who has given something of value to borrow and stands to receive payment for such a thing and to whom the guarantee is given is known as the creditor. The person who gives the guarantee to pay in case of default of the principal debtor is known as the surety.

To learn more about surety.

https://brainly.com/question/31952994

#SPJ4

In the past, the supreme court applied the "lemon test" to determine whether the establishment clause's protection of religious freedom had been violated.

Under those guidelines, the Court might look at the proposed resource to the non secular entity and make certain that it had a clean secular purpose. The Court additionally might decide if the number one impact of the resource might increase or inhibit religion. For the 0.33 prong, brought withinside the Walz case, the Court might look at whether or not the resource might create an immoderate governmental entanglement with religion.

To byskip this test, thereby permitting the show or motto to remain, the authorities conduct (1) need to have a mundane purpose, (2) need to have a primary or number one impact that doesn't increase or inhibit religion, and (3) can not foster an immoderate authorities entanglement with religion. Category: Freedom of religion.

Learn more about supreme court visit : brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.

The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.

They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.

To know more about employment , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17459074

#SPJ4

The correct statement regarding the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is: C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.

The criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) are not solely limited to foreign officials (Option A) or foreign companies (Option B). While foreign officials and companies can be held accountable under the FCPA, the scope of enforcement extends to any individual or entity, regardless of nationality, involved in corrupt practices.

Under the FCPA, fines imposed on individuals cannot be paid by their employer (Option C). This means that an individual found guilty of violating the FCPA cannot rely on their employer to cover the financial penalties. Each individual is personally responsible for paying the fines imposed as a result of their misconduct.

Furthermore, fines imposed on individuals for FCPA violations can exceed $10,000 (Option D). The actual fines can vary depending on the severity of the violation, the benefits obtained from the corrupt practices, and other factors considered during sentencing. The fines can be substantial, often reaching into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.

Lastly, if corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, both the intermediaries and the individuals involved can be fined (Option E). The FCPA does not shield intermediaries from penalties; rather, it holds all parties involved accountable for their role in the corrupt activities.

Learn more about Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

brainly.com/question/30626255

#SPJ11

Adya goes to Mateo's Mexican resturant for dinner. Adya's status with regard to the store is that of public invitee. The correct option is B.

An individual who is invited onto public property for commercial purposes is referred to as a public invitee. Adya is owed a duty of care by the establishment to make sure that guests are kept in a reasonably safe environment because she is a public invitee. To protect its customers from harm the restaurant has a duty to uphold safe conditions address any hazards and issue sufficient warnings.

Adya is welcomed or permitted onto the property as a customer dining at the restaurant for the benefit of the general public. In general, restaurants extend a warm invitation to the general public to dine and take advantage of their offerings. Adya would therefore be regarded as a public invitee while dining at Mateo's Mexican restaurant. The correct option is B.

Learn more about invitee at:

brainly.com/question/6827115

#SPJ4

Medical malpractice suits are good examples of tort cases. They fall under negligence torts, which happen due to carelessness or lack of attention to a situation.

A tort is a civil wrongdoing that causes injury or damage to an individual, group, or entity. It occurs when one party violates another's legal rights, which may result in criminal or civil liability. Medical malpractice cases are a typical example of a tort claim, in which a patient claims to have suffered harm as a result of a doctor's mistake or neglect. The three types of torts are intentional, strict liability, and negligence. Intentional torts are done intentionally to harm someone else, strict liability is done without intent, and negligence torts are based on carelessness or lack of attention to a situation. Medical malpractice suits are categorized under negligence torts, which means the healthcare professional was careless in their duty to the patient, resulting in injury or harm. A medical malpractice suit can be brought against a hospital, healthcare professional, or medical facility. The lawsuit is aimed to prove that the accused party failed to perform their duty of care, which led to harm or damage to the plaintiff. Medical malpractice suits can be complicated, and costly, and require legal expertise to pursue successfully. The average medical malpractice lawsuit payout is $300,000; however, it can be more or less depending on the circumstances of the case.

To know more about tort, visit

https://brainly.com/question/14927068

#SPJ11

— Ethics are a set of moral values an individual establishes for one's self and your own personal behavior. Laws are structured rules utilized to govern all of society. Differences between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. Laws are the rules a country or community mandates its citizens follow in order to regulate society. Religion is a structure of faith and worship. It's a belief system based on faith in a supernatural power.

pa brainlest po:) ThankYou

Hope it helps in you, GOODLUCK!

Answer: I'm not sure if I understand your question, or if you misunderstood the workings of this platform but this is how you ask question where other people answer your question(s).

If you have any questions let me know.

Answer:

The reason of traffic laws is to protect you and other people in the streets and to have a proper line of vehicles in the road to avoid accidents.

The Model Code of Conduct for Political Parties and Candidates is a collection of rules developed with the agreement of political parties that have agreed to adhere by the ideals inherent in the code, as well as to respect and observe it in its text and spirit.

The Indian Election Commission is a permanent and autonomous organization. It is in charge of holding elections for the Indian Parliament, State Legislatures, President, and Vice President. The Election Commission of India issues rules for holding free and fair elections in India. These recommendations provide political parties and candidates with an outline of what to "do and don't" before and during the election. The Model Code of Conduct is a set of guidelines that must be observed by both candidates and political parties running for office. The Model Code of Behaviour is a collection of standards and instructions for election campaigns, general conduct, and meetings. The Model Code of Conduct stays in force until the elections are concluded.

To know more about the Model Code of Conduct:

https://brainly.com/question/28392010

#SPJ4

The local service delivery system in the Philippines refers to the provision of basic services such as healthcare, education, water, and sanitation to citizens by the local government units (LGUs).

The LGUs are responsible for implementing national policies and programs at the local level, ensuring that services are delivered efficiently and effectively. The system is designed to promote greater citizen participation in decision-making and to enhance the accountability of local officials. Despite some challenges such as inadequate funding, weak institutional capacity, and limited technical expertise, the local service delivery system in the Philippines has made significant progress in recent years. The government has taken steps to strengthen LGUs, including devolving more functions and resources to them, providing technical assistance and training, and improving monitoring and evaluation systems.

Learn more about government :

https://brainly.com/question/1510449

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Relationship Between the Three Tiers of Government – Federal, State, and Local Government.

Explanation:

n a federation, the three tiers of government, Federal, State, and Local, work independently but concurrently. They work hand in hand, all for the smooth running of the federation.

Answer:

xjxn

Explanation:

sisjshhdjcojssjxkknskxjansokxksjsx

For use by law enforcement, the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program produces accurate information. Additionally, it offers information to the general public, the media, scholars, and criminal justice students. Since 1930, the program has been producing crime statistics.

If you do report the incident, there is a greater chance that the offender will be apprehended and prevented from harming someone else in the future. Your neighbourhood victim services program can assist you and provide support if you wish to talk to someone before you take this action.

Over 18,000 law enforcement agencies participate in the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), a voluntary, national statistical endeavour that collects data on crimes that come to their attention.

The UCR Program of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) receives the crime data, as does a state UCR program.

Learn more about Uniform Crime Reporting here:

https://brainly.com/question/14450134

#SPJ9

The anti-federalists won a crucial promise for their passage of the new constitution. This was the addition of a Bill of Rights to the constitution.

The Federalists, who supported the Constitution, were the ones who won the crucial promise for the passage of the new Constitution.

The Federalists believed that a bill of rights was not necessary as they believed that the Constitution itself limited the power of the federal government and protected individual rights.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a bill of rights was essential in order to protect individual rights and liberties from government infringement. As a compromise to assure that the U.S. Constitution would be adopted by the required number of states, the Bill of Rights was inserted as the first 10 amendments in 1791.

To learn more about anti-federalists

https://brainly.com/question/29761963

#SPJ4

The three major categories of legal considerations are:

Civil Law: Civil law encompasses legal matters that involve disputes between individuals, organizations, or entities. It deals with private rights and remedies, focusing on issues such as contracts, property, torts (personal injuries or damages), family law, and business law. Civil law cases typically involve seeking compensation, enforcing rights, or resolving conflicts between parties.

Criminal Law: Criminal law pertains to offenses committed against society as a whole and involves actions that are considered illegal and punishable by the government. It encompasses crimes such as theft, assault, murder, fraud, and drug offenses. Criminal law cases involve the prosecution of individuals accused of committing crimes and focus on determining guilt or innocence, and if found guilty, imposing appropriate punishments or penalties.

Constitutional Law: Constitutional law revolves around the interpretation and application of a country's constitution, which serves as the supreme law of the land. It involves analyzing the rights, powers, and limitations imposed by the constitution on the government and its branches. Constitutional law cases often deal with issues related to fundamental rights, separation of powers, due process, equal protection, and other constitutional principles. They can arise from conflicts between governmental actions or policies and constitutional provisions.

These three categories cover the broad spectrum of legal considerations, encompassing various aspects of civil disputes, criminal offenses, and constitutional principles. It's important to note that there are other specialized areas of law as well, such as administrative law, international law, environmental law, intellectual property law, and more, which may overlap or fall within these major categories depending on the nature of the legal issue at hand.

To know more about Categories  visit
https://brainly.com/question/33624491

#SPJ11

Through lobbying, the government may enact legislation that forbids businesses from using insulting or unfair commercial practices.

Lobbying is the practice of trying to persuade a member of the legislature or a member of their staff to support a particular position through oral or written communication.

Any effort made by individuals or special interest groups to influence policy is known as lobbying.

Therefore, this might lead to ineffective policymaking because of improper influence, unfair competition, and policy capture.

Learn more about law, here:

https://brainly.com/question/16594094

#SPJ1

Answer:

What are the following statements?

a)Rounded to the nearest whole number, the odds of being audited are approximately 0.

b)Rounded to the nearest whole number, the odds against being audited are approximately 24.

To calculate the odds, we need to divide the probability of an event occurring by the probability of the event not occurring.

(a) The probability of an IRS audit for U.S. taxpayers who file form 1040 and earn $100,000 or more is 4.0 percent, which can be expressed as 0.04.

Odds = Probability of event occurring / Probability of event not occurring

Odds of being audited = 0.04 / (1 - 0.04) = 0.04 / 0.96 ≈ 0.042

Rounded to the nearest whole number, the odds of being audited are approximately 0.

(b) The odds against a taxpayer being audited can be calculated as:

Odds against being audited = Probability of event not occurring / Probability of event occurring

Odds against being audited = (1 - 0.04) / 0.04 = 0.96 / 0.04 = 24

Rounded to the nearest whole number, the odds against being audited are approximately 24.

The  Question was incomplete ,find the content below  :

Suppose the probability of an IRS audit is 4.0 percent for U.S. taxpayers who file form 1040 and who earned $100,000 or more.

(a) What are the odds that such a taxpayer will be audited? (Round your answers to the nearest whole number.)

(b) What are the odds against such a taxpayer being audited? (Round your answers to the nearest whole number.

Know more about taxpayer here :

brainly.com/question/30932014

#SPJ8

The system of checks and balances in the United States gives Congress the ability to check both the President and the Supreme Court through its powers of impeachment, oversight, and the power of the purse. This allows Congress to hold the President and federal judges accountable for their actions, and to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful.

The legislative branch, which is represented by Congress, has several key powers that allow it to check the actions of the other two branches. One of these powers is the ability to impeach the President and other federal officials, including judges. This means that if Congress believes that a President or judge has committed a serious crime or abuse of power, it can vote to remove that person from office.

Another important power of Congress is the ability to conduct oversight of the executive branch and its agencies. This means that Congress can review and investigate the actions of the President and his or her administration, and can hold hearings to question officials about their policies and actions. This allows Congress to ensure that the President and his or her administration are acting in the best interests of the American people.

Finally, Congress has the power of the purse, which means that it controls the federal government's budget and can use this power to influence the actions of the President and other federal officials. By controlling the budget, Congress can direct funding to specific programs and agencies, and can also use the threat of cutting funding to exert pressure on the President and other officials to take certain actions or to change their policies.

All of these powers, along with the power to pass laws and approve appointments, give Congress the ability to check both the President and the Supreme Court. This helps to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful and that the powers of government are balanced between the three branches.

Learn more about the United States government and politics here: https://brainly.com/question/28152248

#SPJ4

Answer:

That is the definition.

Hope it helped.

Answer:

he wasn't granted permission to enter the home

Explanation:

he was granted right to monitor not break in to his home

Answer:

mortgage interest deduction