Answers
The Wagner Excello Foods, Inc. v. Fearn Intl'l, Inc. is a legal case that was heard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The case involved a dispute between Wagner Excello Foods, Inc. and Fearn Intl'l, Inc. over a contract for the sale of goods.
Wagner Excello Foods, Inc. claimed that Fearn Intl'l, Inc. had breached the contract by failing to deliver the goods as agreed upon. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Wagner Excello Foods, Inc. and awarded them damages.Wagner Excello Foods is a food processing company based in Missouri, USA. They specialize in the production of meat products such as bacon, sausages, and ham. The company was founded in 1946 and has since become a leading provider of quality meat products to retailers and food service providers throughout the country. In addition to their own brand, Wagner Excello Foods also offers private label options for customers. They pride themselves on using only the highest quality ingredients and employing rigorous quality control measures to ensure the safety and consistency of their products.
learn more about Foods here
https://brainly.com/question/30886832
#SPJ11
Related Questions
discuss the centrility of law to a stable society or social order
Answers
Explanation:
Laws provide a framework and rules to help resolve disputes between individuals.
Laws create a system where individuals can bring their disputes before an impartial fact-finder, such as a judge or jury.
No country can maintain a rule of law society if its people do not respect the laws.
Everyone must make a commitment to respect laws, legal authorities, legal signage and signals, and courts.
The rule of law functions because most of us agree that it is important to follow laws every day.
The student involved in new jersey v. t.l.o. argued that she did not have drugs in her purse. smoking at school did not violate the law. her fourth amendment rights had been violated. the school’s search of her purse was reasonable.
Answers
In the case of New Jersey v. T. L. O., the argument of the student was that her fourth amendment rights had been violated.
What did the student in New Jersey v. T.L.O. argue?T.L.O was a student in a New Jersey High School whose purse was searched when she and another student were caught smoking.
She argued that her 4th Amendment right to be protected from unreasonable searches had been violated but the Supreme Court ruled against her.
Find out more on New Jersey v. T.L.O. at https://brainly.com/question/10634066.
Answer:
The search was reasonable.
Its A
if a person shows you an obviously fake id you should confiscate it. true or false
Answers
The statement "If a person shows you an obviously fake ID, you should not confiscate it. " is false. It is a illegal process.
You should refuse it and deny the person access to the service they are seeking. Confiscating an ID is not legal and could lead to legal complications for the individual who confiscated it.
Additionally, if the person is a minor attempting to purchase alcohol or tobacco, confiscating their fake ID may not deter them from attempting to purchase these items again in the future with another fake ID.
Instead, businesses should train their staff to identify fake IDs and take appropriate action, such as refusing the sale or contacting law enforcement if necessary.
Refusing the sale and denying access to the service is the legal way of handling such cases.
For more such questions on illegal process visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10319506
#SPJ8
Can State Constitutions can provide fewer rights to individuals than the U.S.Constitution?
a) Only with respect to Criminal Procedural Rights.
b) Only with respect to Civil Liberties.
c) They cannot provide fewer rights to individuals.
d) They can provide fewer rights to individuals.
Answers
Select the correct answer.
What type of glass is heat resistant?
O A. leaded glass
OB.
tinted glass
O c. borosilicate glass
OD. tempered glass
Answers
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Because "boro" is known for having low coefficients of thermal expansion.
in the landmark case, hawkins v. mcgee (the case of the hairy hand), the court determined that the correct measure of damages was:
Answers
Answer:
The court held that the proper measure of damages should be based on Hawkins's expected value from the parties' contract — the difference in value between a 100% good hand and the hairy hand that Hawkins actually received.
Specify the key requirements for police officers in determining the lawfulness of the use of force in making an arrest and what is meant by "reasonableness
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Specify the key requirements for police officers in determining the lawfulness of the use of force in making an arrest and what is meant by "reasonableness
the _______ of the governed refers to the idea that a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power is justified and lawful only when consented to by the people or society over which that political power is exercised.
Answers
The consent of the governed refers to the idea that a government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power is justified and lawful only when consented to by the people or society over which that political power is exercised.
This concept is a key principle of democracy and is rooted in the idea that governments are created by and for the people.
Without the consent of the governed, a government cannot legitimately exercise power over its citizens. This consent can be given through various means, such as voting in elections or agreeing to a social contract.
It is important for governments to maintain the consent of the governed in order to remain legitimate and maintain their authority.
For more similar questions on consent:
brainly.com/question/21364745
#SPJ11
With reference to relevant authority, indicate whether a partnership is recognised as a separate entity apart from the partners in terms of South African law.
Answers
The common law is the primary source of partnership regulations in South Africa because a partnership is not universally recognized as a separate legal entity separate from its owners.
What is a partnership?A partnership is a business arrangement in which two or more people combine their resources to form a business with the agreement to share risks, profits, and losses.
Examples of common partnerships include:
Law firmsPhysician groups, Real estate investment firmsAccounting groups.Thus, there are no existing partnership laws in South Africa, and partnerships are generally not separate from their owners.
Learn more about partnership businesses at https://brainly.com/question/14034519
Are those groups comprised of criminally minded individuals who have used the internet to communicate, collaborate, and facilitate cybercrime?
Answers
Cybercriminal Organizations are comprised of criminally minded individuals who have used the internet to communicate, collaborate, and facilitate cybercrime.
Cybercrime is any criminal activity that targets or uses a computer, computer network, or connected device. Most cybercrime is perpetrated by cybercriminals or hackers looking to make money. However, sometimes cybercrime aims to damage computers and networks for reasons other than profit. Cybercrime is a crime involving computers and networks.
Your computer may have been used in a crime or targeted. Cybercrime can put your personal security and financial well-being at risk. Fraud and identity theft (although the increasing use of malware, hacking, or phishing has made it an example of both "computer-targeted" and "computer-as-a-tool" crimes) Information warfare. Phishing - Betrug. spam.
Learn more about cybercrime here
https://brainly.com/question/13109173
#SPJ4
If i commit war crimes during a civil war, is it a civil war crime or just a war crime?
Answers
If war crimes are committed during a civil war, they are considered war crimes rather than civil war crimes.
War crimes refer to violations of international humanitarian law committed during armed conflicts. These crimes include acts such as torture, genocide, and indiscriminate attacks on civilians. The classification of war crimes is based on the nature of the acts committed and the context of the conflict, rather than the specific type of war.
Civil wars, on the other hand, are internal conflicts between different groups within a country. While civil wars can be the backdrop for war crimes, the crimes themselves are still considered war crimes under international law. The distinction lies in the fact that the crimes are committed during a war, regardless of whether it is an international or civil conflict.
Therefore, if war crimes are committed during a civil war, they are classified as war crimes rather than civil war crimes. The designation of a war crime is determined by the nature of the acts and their violation of international humanitarian law, regardless of the specific type of war in which they occur. Hence, the term "war crime" encompasses acts committed during both international and civil conflicts.
Learn more about crimes here:
https://brainly.com/question/29308572
#SPJ11
Which branch of the military requires their law enforcement officers to complete a Single Source Background Investigation (SSBI)?
OA. Navy
OB. Coast Guard
OC. Army
OD. Air Force
Answers
if not please correct me
In no less than 50 sentences, write down a three-paragraph essay on: “CAN POLICE BRUTALITY EVER BE JUSTIFIED?”
Answers
I. Introduction
Definition of police brutalityThesis statement: While there may be some circumstances in which police officers are justified in using force, police brutality is never acceptable and can never be fully justified.II. Background information on police brutality
Statistics on the prevalence of police brutalityExamples of high-profile cases of police brutalityIII. Arguments for the justification of police brutality
Situations in which police officers may feel threatened or justified in using forceThe need for police officers to protect themselves and the publicIV. Rebuttal of arguments for the justification of police brutality
Police officers are trained to de-escalate situations and use appropriate levels of forceThe use of excessive force often leads to further escalation and violencePolice officers should be held to a higher standard of conduct and be held accountable for their actionsV. Alternatives to the use of force by police officers
Community policing and restorative justice approachesThe use of non-lethal weapons and de-escalation techniquesVI. Conclusion
The use of police brutality is never justified and must be actively addressed and preventedThe need for reforms and accountability to ensure that all members of the community are treated with dignity and respect.write a paragraph on your opinion of the correctional system. Do you feel it should be altered or changed?
Answers
Answer:
I think it should stay it is as good as it seem
I'm new here by the way
Why is the designation of conspiracy as a crime sometimes criticized
as a threat to First Amendment freedoms?
Answers
Answer:
The First Amendment states that: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. So, some scholars and lawyers believe that the crime of conspiracy infringes on "the right of the people peaceably to assemble." Conspiracy is, essentially, the crime of association and can be used to keep unpopular groups from association with each other. Conspiracy has been used time and again in history to shut down both good and bad groups but it does limit ones ability to peaceably assemble.
Which amendment is often invoked today in cases concerning affirmative action and reporductive choice
Answers
The amendment that is often invoked today in cases concerning affirmative action and reproductive choice is the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, contains several provisions that have been central to modern debates on affirmative action and reproductive choice. Specifically, two clauses within the amendment are frequently referenced in these contexts: the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause.
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause has been instrumental in cases involving affirmative action, where individuals or groups challenge government policies that use race or ethnicity as a factor in promoting diversity or remedying past discrimination.
The Supreme Court has ruled that any governmental use of race must meet a strict scrutiny standard, meaning it must serve a compelling state interest and be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
This clause has been the basis for protecting an individual's right to privacy, which has been cited in cases involving reproductive choice. The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) established that a woman has a constitutional right to choose to have an abortion under the Due Process Clause.
know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29517519
#SPJ11
Which of the two policital parties is more in favor of extended mail in voting
Answers
Answer:
i believe democrats
hope this helps:)
Explanation:
There Are 2 types of distracted drivers which 2 types of drivers are they
Answers
Answer:
the 2 types are Visual and Manual drivers
Answer:
There are three main types of distraction:
Visual: taking your eyes off the road. Manual: taking your hands off the wheel. Cognitive: taking your mind off driving.Explanation:
Hope it helps^^
To help manage risk, it is essential that you ___________ that can increase levels of risk.
Answers
To help manage risk, it is essential that you remain alert to conditions or objects that can increase levels of risk.
Explanation:
i need help asap plz
Answers
Types of jurisdiction include which of the following?
In personam
In rem
Subject matter
Original and appellate
All of these choices are correct.
Answers
Answer:
All of these choices are correct.
Explanation:
- In Personam Jurisdiction
In personam jurisdiction (or personal jurisdiction) refers to courts' authority over particular entities, and their liabilities & rights.
- In Rem Jurisdiction
In rem jurisdiction refers to courts' authority over property within a county, district, or state.
- Original and Appellate Jurisdiction
Original jurisdiction refers to courts' authority to review a case, and appellate jurisdiction refers to courts' authority to review decisions adjudicated by lower courts.
Question 1 of 10 Which of the following is an obligation of creditors in the debtor-creditor relationship? A. To make threats to collect payment B. To pay the loan in full and on time C. To communicate when payment can't be met D. To disclose hidden fees and charges SUBMIT
Answers
Answer: C. To communicate when payment can't be met
Explanation:
A creditor refers to the individual who lends another person something e.g money. On the other hand, the debtor is the person who borrows something.
It should be noted that the relationship between the creditor and the debtor is important in order vital to be able to achieve operational excellence.
An obligation of creditors in the debtor-creditor relationship is to communicate when payment can't be met.
to deny human rights is to challenge their very humanity discuss
Answers
should ignore it and if they do it again do the right to hit .
Explanation:
bc that's rude .
jeremy owes the utility company for a past due account. the past due account became an issue when jeremy went to apply for a car loan. the utility company had put the past due account on jeremy's credit report. jeremy has offered to settle the bill with the utility company by paying them fifty percent of his balance due. the payment would actually constitute consideration because the statute of limitations has run and jeremy has no legal duty to pay the utility company. which of the following terms best describes the agreement between jeremy and the utility company if they reduce it in writing and jeremy is acting in good faith?
Answers
The term that best describes the agreement between Jeremy and the utility company, if they reduce it in writing and Jeremy is acting in good faith, is an "Accord and Satisfaction."
This is when a debtor offers to pay a lesser amount than the full amount owed, and the creditor accepts this offer in full settlement of the debt. In this case, Jeremy offers to pay fifty percent of the balance due, and the utility company agrees, creating an accord and satisfaction of the past due account.
What is accord and satisfaction means?
The terms "accord and satisfaction" refer to both the initial agreement (accord) between two contracting parties to accept alternative performance in order to fulfil a prior obligation and the actual fulfilment of that agreement (satisfaction). The new show is referred to as the accord.
For more such question on Accord and Satisfaction
https://brainly.com/question/30826918
#SPJ11
Thời kì nào chưa có nhà nước
Answers
Task: Personal skills in Law Enforcement
Create a chart that lists at least five law enforcement careers. List the reading, writing,
listening, speaking, math, and science skills essential for each career and explain why
professionals in these positions need these skills. You may conduct online research in order
to find enough information to write your answer.
Type your response here:
Answers
Answer:
law enforcement
Explanation:
Answer:
y=3
Explanation:
Which of the following statements is true of the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?
A. They are only imposed on foreign officials.
B. They are only imposed on foreign companies.
C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
D. Fines imposed on individuals do not exceed $10,000.
E. If corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, only the intermediaries are fined.
Answers
The correct statement regarding the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is: C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
The criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) are not solely limited to foreign officials (Option A) or foreign companies (Option B). While foreign officials and companies can be held accountable under the FCPA, the scope of enforcement extends to any individual or entity, regardless of nationality, involved in corrupt practices.
Under the FCPA, fines imposed on individuals cannot be paid by their employer (Option C). This means that an individual found guilty of violating the FCPA cannot rely on their employer to cover the financial penalties. Each individual is personally responsible for paying the fines imposed as a result of their misconduct.
Furthermore, fines imposed on individuals for FCPA violations can exceed $10,000 (Option D). The actual fines can vary depending on the severity of the violation, the benefits obtained from the corrupt practices, and other factors considered during sentencing. The fines can be substantial, often reaching into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
Lastly, if corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, both the intermediaries and the individuals involved can be fined (Option E). The FCPA does not shield intermediaries from penalties; rather, it holds all parties involved accountable for their role in the corrupt activities.
Learn more about Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ11
How does criminological research impact social policies ?
Answers
Compare and contrast classical approaches of explaining crime to positivist approaches of explaining crime
Answers
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction