What was America's greatest contribution to World War II?

Answer:

"I shot him because he assaulted me and I felt threatened" Make sure to put the answer in quotations

Explanation:

His claim of self-defense is likely to be "I shot him because he assaulted

me and I felt threatened because he pushed me to the ground"

This is a countermeasure which involves individuals protecting

themselves against harm.

Alfonso was assaulted and felt threatened which was why he acted in self-

defense by shooting George.

Read more about Self-defense here https://brainly.com/question/2920735

Getting people involved, keeping them informed, analyzing results, and making adjustments are all essential steps to taking to increase turnout. One must learn to communicate well. This is further explained below.

Generally, transfer of knowledge from one person to another by oral, written, or other means.

In conclusion, in a bid  to keep people engage and participating more in the program it is important that the communication lines are open to there need be it safety requirement, dietary requirement, or allergies.

Read more about communication

https://brainly.com/question/22558440

#SPJ1

Liebeck v. McDonald's is a famous case that revolves around a woman named Stella Liebeck who was severely burned by a cup of hot coffee she purchased from McDonald's. She sued McDonald's for serving coffee that was too hot and received a substantial monetary settlement.

In my opinion, the end result of this case was fair. While some may argue that Liebeck should have known that the coffee was hot, the truth is that McDonald's was serving coffee that was significantly hotter than industry standards, which made it more dangerous. The coffee was so hot that it caused third-degree burns on Liebeck's legs and required extensive medical treatment.

The monetary settlement that Liebeck received was not only meant to compensate her for her medical expenses and suffering but also to send a message to McDonald's and other companies to prioritize customer safety over profits. In the end, the case brought attention to the need for companies to adhere to safety standards and provided justice for Liebeck's injuries.

Know more about third-degree burns here:

https://brainly.com/question/30592567

#SPJ11

Here rescission is appropriate because the contracting parties were mutually mistaken as to the condition of the property. The environmental contamination substantially reduced its value. Hence, the award of damages to the Berensteins was reversed and the Sharabianlous have to be refunded their deposit.

Rescission occurs when a contract is declared void and ceases to be accepted as binding by the law. The courts have the authority to release non-liable parties from their contractual commitments and, when practical, will work to put them back in the same situation as before the contract was made.

Rescission is intended to restore the parties as nearly as possible to their former positions and to bring about substantial justice by adjusting the equities between the parties. Rescission does not occur if a contract is affirmed; it means the contract is repudiated. Here rescission is appropriate. The environmental contamination substantially reduced its value.

When an agreement to purchase property is subject to rescission, "the seller must refund all payments received in connection with the sale."

Therefore, Sharabianlous have a good argument for the return of their deposit and rescission of the contract.

To learn more about rescission, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28012454

#SPJ1

Answer:Adaptability persistence and hardwork

Explanation:

hard work

There are 3 characteristics of an entrepreneur that may, a school-leaver to become a successful business owner are:

What is entrepreneur?

The term entrepreneur refers to the person who launched a new business with own risk and profit basis. The setup of new business with new idea and logic is called entrepreneurship. The entrepreneur is the main motive to set up business to generate employment. The entrepreneur is work new idea as called startup company.

There are the there characteristics of an entrepreneur are the successful in the business are adaptability, persistence, hard work. The starting up of a new business with a new idea and logic is called entrepreneurship. The entrepreneur's main motive is to set up a business to generate employment.

As a result, the characteristics of an entrepreneur are the successful in the business are adaptability, persistence, hard work.

Learn more about on entrepreneur, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13897585

#SPJ2

A dealership that fails to comply with safeguards procedures can be subject to fines $2500 for each violation.

A knowing infringement of the dealership results in a $2,500 common punishment for every infringement, and "every infringement" might actually be deciphered as being 1 infringement for each client. On the off chance that the vendor is sufficiently unfortunate to get a "stop and cease" letter from the FTC, they could be having to deal with extra damages up to $11,000 per infringement.

On December 9, 2021, the FTC distributed updates to the Shields Decide that add extra necessities for dealerships, some of which became viable on January 10, 2022 and the rest of which require consistence by December 9, 2022. Showrooms ought to start getting ready now to fulfill the December time constraint as the extra advances expected for consistence can't be achieved for the time being.

To know more about dealership,visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/25666771

#SPJ4

In the Kincaid v. Gibson case, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the students' right to distribute the yearbook based largely on the fact that the creation of the yearbook was a recognized part of the school curriculum.

In 1986, a case was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky known as Kincaid v. Gibson. This case was brought against the school officials in the Laurel County School System by three high school students. The students had worked on the school yearbook and wanted to include an article that criticized the school administration for not providing enough support to the school's arts program. The principal of the school refused to allow the article to be published in the yearbook, citing the school's policy that forbade any negative comments about school officials. However, the students disagreed with the principal's decision and filed a lawsuit claiming that their First Amendment rights had been violated.

The court believed that the students had a right to express their views on a matter of public concern, even if those views were critical of school officials. In summary, the court ruled that the school officials had violated the students' First Amendment rights by censoring their article. This case was a landmark ruling that established the rights of students to express their views in school-sponsored publications.

Learn more about Lawsuit

https://brainly.com/question/30392587

#SPJ11

In the Kincaid v. Gibson case, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the student's right to distribute the yearbook. The court's decision was largely based on the fact that the creation of the yearbook was an exercise of student expression and fell under the protection of the First Amendment.

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech, including freedom of expression. In this case, the court recognized that the yearbook was a form of student expression and therefore protected by the First Amendment. The court understood that students have the right to express their views and ideas through creative projects like yearbooks. It is important to note that the court's ruling was specific to this case and may not apply universally. However, it set a precedent for recognizing student expression rights in similar situations. The court's decision supports the idea that schools should allow students to engage in creative projects like yearbooks, as long as they are not disruptive or harmful.

To know more about the First amendment, visit

https://brainly.com/question/17455428

#SPJ11

Answer:

false

Explanation:

You would need 6 level scoops of coffee grounds to make 15 cups of coffee based on the given ratio.

If it takes 4 level scoops of coffee grounds to make 10 cups of coffee, we can use this ratio to determine the number of scoops needed for 15 cups.

We can set up a proportion:

4 scoops / 10 cups = x scoops / 15 cups

To solve for x (the number of scoops needed for 15 cups), we can cross-multiply:

4 * 15 = 10 * x

60 = 10x

Dividing both sides of the equation by 10:

x = 6

Learn more about coffee grounds

brainly.com/question/30061164

#SPJ11

Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.

Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.

Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.

The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?

cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money

Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income

Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years

Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"

Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:

brainly.com/question/31749142

#SPJ4

An representative bullied a potential customer into signing an insurance contract. The J agent can be charged with coercion.

Insurance comes in a wide variety of forms, but they all serve the same function. It serves to safeguard your finances in the case of an unanticipated loss. If you buy it, it might pay for your life, your property, your house or company, or your medical costs.

A specialist who assists clients in choosing and purchasing insurance products is an insurance agent. They assist their clients in locating the finest coverage for their requirements by working with a range of insurance providers.

For such more question on insurance

https://brainly.com/question/25855858

#SPJ4

The McFadden Act of 1927 and other laws that tried to address long-standing concerns about the concentration of financial activity and concerns that large banking organizations operating in multiple states could not be adequately supervised were largely responsible for these restrictions.

Why did we remove restrictions on banking between states?

After it became clear that restrictions on interstate banking restricted banks' ability to expand regionally and made them vulnerable to local economic crises, regulations were eventually relaxed.

What resulted from the Riegle-Neal Act?

Banks can open branches in other states thanks to the Interstate Act, also known as the Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.

Learn more about banking here:

https://brainly.com/question/25642105

#SPJ4

The  conflict that would most  likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict  is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .

The case that may be  settle by the court of law is when a person damage or  destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage  which will be settle by the jury and   if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

Answer:

A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.

Explanation:

Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.

The pedestrian may be held liable for negligence, and the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian.

In this scenario, the pedestrian may be considered negligent for angrily throwing the ball into the street, creating a hazardous situation. Negligence refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. By throwing the ball into the street, the pedestrian potentially breached their duty of care towards others on the sidewalk, including the eight-year-old girl.

As a result of the pedestrian's negligent act, the girl suffered serious injuries when she ran out into the street to retrieve the ball and was hit by a car. The pedestrian's action directly contributed to the chain of events leading to the girl's injuries.

Therefore, the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian for negligence, seeking compensation for her injuries, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from the accident.

Learn more about: negligence

brainly.com/question/32769351

#SPJ11

Answer: yes that is true but whats the question

Explanation:

False. Regulations on sexually oriented businesses are typically subject to intermediate scrutiny and are not automatically struck down as unconstitutional. The outcome depends on the specific regulations and court decisions.

Regulations on sexually oriented businesses are not always reviewed under strict scrutiny as content-based regulations. The level of scrutiny applied to such regulations can vary depending on the specific circumstances and the legal framework of the jurisdiction in question.

In the United States, regulations on sexually oriented businesses are typically subject to intermediate scrutiny, rather than strict scrutiny. Intermediate scrutiny requires that the regulations be content-neutral and serve a substantial government interest. Under this standard, the government must show that the regulations are narrowly tailored to achieve a legitimate purpose unrelated to the suppression of speech.

While some regulations on sexually oriented businesses have been successfully challenged as unconstitutional, not all regulations are automatically struck down. The courts evaluate each case on its merits, considering factors such as the specific provisions of the regulations, the government's interests, and the impact on free speech rights.

It's important to note that the application and interpretation of laws related to sexually oriented businesses can vary between jurisdictions, and legal outcomes can differ based on specific circumstances and court decisions. Therefore, it is not accurate to say that regulations on sexually oriented businesses are nearly always reviewed under strict scrutiny and struck down as unconstitutional.

To learn more about scrutiny Click Here: brainly.com/question/29793578

#SPJ11

Answer:

The government had already tried hard to judge the middle road of the public benefit against industries or companies, but it has also figured out a way of developing this practice.

An example of this will be legislation financing charter schools, that in general education may be seen as better schools. If that is so, charter schools are generally of the public interest, thus allowing the small group of people who operate these charter schools (sometimes for profit) corporations to operate these schools and the government. They often work in charter schools.

Explanation:

Answer:

The government had already tried hard to judge the middle road of the public benefit against industries or companies, but it has also figured out a way of developing this practice.

An example of this will be legislation financing charter schools, that in general education may be seen as better schools. If that is so, charter schools are generally of the public interest, thus allowing the small group of people who operate these charter schools (sometimes for profit) corporations to operate these schools and the government. They often work in charter schools.

Explanation:

Explanation:

Answer: The number of representatives per state in the House of Representatives is determined by (c.) the population of each state.

Explanation:

Answer:

Civil law deals with the disputes between individual citizens, organizations, and government agencies, in which compensation is awarded to the victim. Examples are defamations like libel and slander, breach of contract, negligence resulting in injury or death, and property damage.

Criminal law deals with crime and the legal punishments that come with a criminal offense. A criminal prosecution involves the government deciding weather to punish and individual for either and act or an omission.

Answer:

Explanation:

better call saul!

Answer: Voting

Explanation:

In a democratic society, the most influential things you can do are to vote and to peaceful protest. But if that doesn't work, you can just take after our stupid country (US) and riot, burning down cities, looting, and when that doesn't work, undermine the democracy and maybe start WW3 in the meantime.

Answer:

that she is a murder and she needs to go to jail for life

Explanation:

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

A Financial support specialist's job is to help you hopefully not go bankrupt after retirement. This includes helping you know what's the best likely option to invest in and what will benefit you.

Answer:

El derecho a la igualdad.

Explanation:

La declaración universal de derechos humanos establece que todas las personas son iguales y tienen los mismos derechos en los campos político, social y económico. Así, es incorrecto que una persona sufra discriminación, desprecio, prejuicio y cualquier otro tipo de injusticia por razón de su género, religión, opción sexual, edad, color, entre otros.

En este caso, podemos decir que si a alguien se le falta el respeto en el trabajo por ser mujer, se está vulnerando el derecho a la igualdad y esto podría tener consecuencias reales.

Answer:

Explanation:

In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.

Answer:

No, Senator Thompson can not do this as all matters dealing with money must start in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Explanation:

The rule comes from the U.S. Consitution, Article I, Section 7, Clause 1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.  If the bill was drafted in the U.S. House and passed the U.S. House Subcommittee, then passed by the full U.S. House, Senator Thompson could go around and ask other Senators to vote for the Bill, but he could not have written the Bill and have it start in the U.S. Senate.

It can be inferred that it took so long for the Sixth Amendment right to become standard practice in America because: "

Most people are not aware of all the amendments and what they guarantee." (Option B)

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial before a completely unbiased jury of the State and district wherein the crime was committed, which district shall have been previously determined by law, and to be notified of the character and cause of the accusation;

to be challenged with the witnesses against him; to have a mandatory procedure for gathering evidence in his favor; and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

In governance and law, an amendment is an addition or change made to a constitution, legislation, or legislative bill or resolution.

Modifications can be made to existing constitutions and statutes, as well as to legislation during their transit through a legislature.

Learn more about the Sixth Amendment:
https://brainly.com/question/905718
#SPJ1

Government patent regulations stipulate that inventors will keep complete legal rights to their respective inventions for a specified period of time.

A patent is a government-granted right to exclude others from manufacturing, using, or selling an invention for a certain period of time. It provides inventors the right to protect their inventions against others who may want to imitate them.

To obtain a patent, an inventor must apply to the government's patent office. The government regulates the patent process to ensure that an inventor is granted the legal rights to an invention.

This means that the government provides protection for inventors who want to secure their ideas and creations from others who may want to copy them. The government regulates patents so that inventors may maintain complete legal rights to their respective inventions for a specified period of time.

This can include the right to manufacture, use, or sell the invention, as well as the right to exclude others from doing so.

To know more about patent refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/12882864#

#SPJ11

A city or other governmental entity must show that its restrictions are justified by proving that they are "reasonable" and "narrowly tailored" to serve a "significant governmental interest." This is known as the "intermediate scrutiny" standard, and it is applied to restrictions on speech or expression in public forums.

Under this standard, the governmental entity must demonstrate that its restrictions are necessary to achieve a legitimate governmental interest, such as protecting public safety or preventing disruption.

Additionally, the restrictions must be narrowly tailored, meaning that they must be the least restrictive means of achieving the governmental interest.

In the case of Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery, the governmental entity would have to prove that its restrictions on speech or expression are necessary to protect the dignity and solemnity of the cemetery, and that they are the least restrictive means of achieving this goal.

Overall, the governmental entity must show that its restrictions are reasonable, narrowly tailored, and serve a significant governmental interest in order to be justified under the intermediate scrutiny standard.

For more similar questions on scrutiny:

brainly.com/question/24309787

#SPJ11

In the United States, this statement is true for passenger cars and light trucks.

In the United States, this statement is true for passenger cars and light trucks. According to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), every passenger car and light truck must have two independent braking systems: a service brake system and an emergency brake system. Each system must be able to stop the vehicle alone, so that if one system fails, the other can still stop the vehicle.

This  requirement helps to ensure that vehicles have a reliable means of stopping in case of brake failure, which is essential for safety on the road.

However , it's worth noting that this requirement may not apply to all types of vehicles in all countries around the world, as regulations can vary by jurisdiction.

Visit to know more about United States:-

brainly.com/question/28806805

#SPJ11

The statement is true. Vehicles are generally required to have two separate braking systems, one for regular use and another for emergencies or parking. This requirement enhances safety in the event of malfunctions.

True, it is a general legal requirement for every vehicle to have at least two separate braking systems. The main reasoning for this is safety. In case one system fails or malfunctions, the other can be used to stop the vehicle, ensuring the safety of the driver and passengers. The primary system is often referred to as the service brake system, while the secondary system is commonly known as a parking or emergency brake. However, laws may vary by country, state, or municipality, so it's beneficial to familiarize oneself with local vehicle regulations.

https://brainly.com/question/35158621

#SPJ6