What was FDR's quote?

The following would possibly make you think that an ID is fake: it is probably thinner or thicker, printed with fuzzy bar codes, or bar code strips on back.

Identityentification is the impulsive part of our psyche which responds at once and at once to fundamental urges, needs, and desires. The persona of the new child is all identityentification, and best of all, it expands an ego and super-ego.

From the above rationalization, it's clear that alternative D, all of the above, is the right alternative.

Learn more about ID, refer to:

brainly.com/question/4774641

#SPJ2

Answer: There is a free PDF called Fry Versus Daubert: Practically the same? by Pamela J. Jensen (2003) that I think you'll find helpful

Application of sensing and communications technology to ground transportation is known as an intelligent transportation system (ITS), which aims to increase efficiency, mobility, and safety.

Traditional transport system include the cars and boats that local communities utilize for land and water travel. Bengal has historically relied on elephants, horses, donkeys, and buffaloes for land transportation. Elephants were utilized to move soldiers and supplies across battlefields during the ancient and medieval periods.

Old transportation relied on animals like camels, donkeys, and buffalo. There are automobiles, motorcycles, ships, and trains used in modern transportation. People endured a lot of suffering during the era of the old transportation, but since the advent of modern transportation, life has grown simpler.

To know more about Traditional transport system, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28696490

#SPJ4

The plaintiff has initiated a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging that she was hit by a speeding car driven by the defendant

The plaintiff is the party who files the lawsuit and asks the court to grant them their request, whereas the defendant is the party who is being sued and must refute the claims stated by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff might be able to seek damages from the defendant if she can demonstrate that the defendant was actually operating the vehicle that struck her and that the defendant was moving too quickly. Compensation for medical expenses, lost pay, and pain and suffering are all examples of damages.

The plaintiff may be required to present evidence to support her claims, including witness statements, medical records, any available security film, and police reports.

For such more question on lawsuit:

https://brainly.com/question/30707234

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think true

Explanation:

Answer:

All the safeguarding tools and resources your organisations needs to ... Setting up and following good safeguarding policies and procedures means children are safe from adults and other children who might pose a risk. ... What is safeguarding? ... action to enable all children and young people to have the best outcomes.

Answer:   Involuntary Manslaughter

Explanation:  

It is believed that Terry did not intentionally commit a crime. Intent would have resulted in a murder case. Murder, whether or not it is  premeditated or unpremeditated, is intentional. The difference with manslaughter is that: voluntary manslaughter, while requiring intent, also involves a circumstance in which a reasonable person becomes emotionally disturbed and fueled by passion or impulse rather than judgement. Involuntary manslaughter is the unintentional killing that results from criminal negligence or recklessness. (no intent or heat of passion).

Elements of crime committed:  

Actus Reus and the element of harm come into play with Terry's case. Because there wasn't causation for his brother's death, the intent element isn't present. Terry has no guilty state of mind.

A plaintiff would typically sue for general damages to compensate for a broken leg.

True. The Statement of Claim is indeed the document that initiates a lawsuit in court.

When a plaintiff sues for compensation due to a broken leg, they generally seek general damages. General damages are non-monetary losses that are not easily quantifiable, such as pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. These damages aim to provide compensation for the physical and emotional harm caused by the injury.

Special damages, on the other hand, cover the specific economic losses resulting from the broken leg, such as medical expenses and loss of income. Aggravated damages may be awarded if the defendant's conduct caused additional distress, while punitive damages are rarely awarded and are meant to punish the defendant for extreme wrongdoing.

The plaintiff, or the party bringing the lawsuit, must file the statement of claim with the court in order to begin a civil action. It describes the case's facts, the claim's legal foundation, and the relief the plaintiff is requesting.

The statement of claim gives the defendant official notice that they are being sued and gives them a chance to refute the claims. Following the filing and service of the statement of claim on the defendant, the court process gets under way, with the goal of either litigating or settling the case.

To know more about plaintiff here https://brainly.com/question/30552468

#SPJ4

Answer:

Clarence Earl Gideon was a career criminal whose actions helped change the American legal system. Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. In a landmark legal decision, Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that under the U.S. Constitution, state courts are required to appoint lawyers for those individuals accused of committing a crime who cannot pay for legal representation.

Explanation:

Because of Gideon's efforts, thousands of individuals who had been tried and convicted without legal representation were granted new trials or released from Florida prisons. Over time, the right to legal representation for impoverished individuals has been extended to include juvenile offenders and adults who commit misdemeanors.

When Clarence Earl Gideon picked up a pencil to write his petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, he set a series of events in motion that changed the nation's legal system, proving that sometimes one person can make an important difference.

Gideon, different from the thousands of other criminal defendants, as his actions helped change the American legal system.

Clarence Earl Gideon was indeed a violent offender whose acts aided in the transformation of the American justice system. Gideon has been accused of robbery, but could not afford to hire an attorney to reflect him in court.

Gideon brought his case to the United States after being convicted guilty and subjected to five years in prison.

Thousands of people who had been prosecuted and sentenced without legal counsel were permitted new trials or freed from Florida prisons as a result of Gideon's work. Over time, the right of destitute people to legal counsel has been expanded to cover young offenders and adults who commit offenses.

Clarence Earl Gideon took up a pencil to begin writing his plea to the U.S. He put in motion a chain of events that reshaped the nation's judicial system, demonstrating that one individual may occasionally make a significant difference.

Therefore, it can be concluded that Gideon helped to develop the legal system.

Learn more about Gideon here:

https://brainly.com/question/20791026

#SPJ2

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996  is the legal framework supporting health information privacy.  Since it's a legal requirement, security of health information and clinical records are safeguarded.

A federal law- The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act  -  mandated the creation of nationwide guidelines to avoid the disclosure of sensitive medical data regarding patients without the patient's awareness or consent. The Act safeguards a person's privacy by defining rules for the gathering, storage, accuracy, disposal, use, and disclosure of confidential information. Since it's a legal requirement, security of health information and clinical records are safeguarded. Ransomware is among the most prevalent data cyber threats inside and outside of the health industry.

Learn more on legal framework

https://brainly.com/question/30153323

#SPJ4

Answer:

The first 10 amendments in the constitution is known as the bill of rights

Explanation:

it just is

Answer:

d

Explanation:

A producer may not advertise an insurance product if he/she publishes the ad in a trade journal. The correct option is A.

Your insurance company cannot survive without marketing. It is how you develop warm leads from cold calls and expand your company. A well-thought-out marketing plan aids in establishing and maintaining a clientele that comes to your agency first for their insurance requirements.

Producers of insurance are those who work in the insurance industry. The state in which an insurance producer sells insurance requires licensing. It might be necessary to pass a test or adhere to state-specific educational and/or ethical requirements.

Thus, the ideal selection is option A.

Learn more about advertising here:

https://brainly.com/question/3163475

#SPJ1

Yes, you should prosecutors have the option to decide not to seek the death sentence in aggravated murder cases in counties where the majority of the public favors it.

Because It should be emphasized that, for all crimes for which the death penalty is the penalty, this is not the only capital punishment available; rather, it is the most severe penalty. As a result, these clauses by virtue of their language alone provide the courts the authority to determine the appropriate level of punishment.

The message sent by the death penalty is that if you commit a major crime like murder, you won't get a second opportunity. Some societies urgently require the dissemination of this message to reduce crime.

Learn more about capital punishment Visit: brainly.com/question/29452997

#SPJ4

Answer:

D. Reaching out.

Explanation:

Individuals in criminal justice careers need to be sure to avoid unethical behavior which might damage public trust. Public trust ensures community members feel safe reaching out to criminal justice agencies.

In the criminal justice system, when individuals such as prosecutors and defendants are trustworthy, sincere, morally upright and acts in a manner that benefits and adds significant value to the judicial process, they are said to be ethical in their career. Thus, this ethical behavior goes a long way in enhancing and enabling public trust, as well as building their confidence in the criminal justice system.

This ultimately implies that, a larger percentage of the members of the community would feel safe, confident, eager and enthusiastic to reach out to various criminal justice agencies when there is public trust.

False. Unauthorized individuals should not be detained or interrogated at the crime scene by the first responding officer.

First Responder on the scene of a crime The duty to safeguard the general public, preserve the crime scene, and manage changes falls on the first responder, or the officer who arrives on the scene first. Securing and isolating the scene is the first stage. Why is it crucial to keep spectators away from crime scenes? Every person who arrived had the capacity to tamper with the physical proof. When conducting an investigation in a criminal case, police are responsible for carrying out a variety of tasks, including making arrests, dispersing unauthorised gatherings, adopting proactive measures, and many more. A typical step before a trial is the police investigation of offences that are punishable by law.

Learn more about crime

https://brainly.com/question/14463204

#SPJ4

Since the broker-dealer is located in state A, therefor Only state A state administrators have jurisdiction over the offer.

An offer is a preliminary offer made by a purchaser to purchase or sell any asset that, if approved, has legal force. Another definition of an offer is the act of selling something or submitting a purchase bid. An offer is a precise proposition to sell or purchase a certain good or service under particular circumstances.

Offers are presented in a way that would allow a reasonable person to accept them, and doing so will result in a legally binding contract. There are many various kinds of offers, and each one is unique in the qualities it combines, such as the price criteria, the rules and regulations, the kind of property, and the objectives of the purchaser and seller.

Learn more about offer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29237713

#SPJ4

The double jeopardy clause, as outlined in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, prohibits an individual from being tried for the same crime twice. This principle is intended to protect citizens from being subjected to the trauma and financial burden of multiple trials for the same offense. However, there is ongoing debate about whether prosecution for a crime in both state and federal courts should also be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause.

One argument for prohibiting prosecution in both state and federal courts is that it would prevent the government from using the legal system as a means of harassment or punishment. If an individual is acquitted or convicted in a state court, it would be unjust for them to be subjected to another trial in a federal court for the same crime. This would also prevent the government from using multiple trials as a means of securing a conviction, even if there is not enough evidence to support a guilty verdict in one court.

On the other hand, some argue that prosecution in both state and federal courts should not be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause because it allows for different levels of government to hold individuals accountable for their actions. For example, if a crime is committed on federal land or involves crossing state lines, it may be appropriate for both state and federal prosecutors to pursue charges. Additionally, some argue that prohibiting prosecution in both state and federal courts would hinder the government's ability to effectively combat organized crime or other complex criminal activities that may span multiple jurisdictions.

In conclusion, the double jeopardy clause is an important principle that is intended to protect citizens from being subjected to multiple trials for the same crime. However, whether prosecution in both state and federal courts should be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the potential consequences for citizens and the government's ability to effectively combat crime.

The Canadian Experience Class (CEC) is a popular immigration program designed for foreign nationals who have already gained skilled work experience in Canada.

Individuals must have at least one year of skilled work experience in Canada in the last three years and meet additional criteria, such as language proficiency and education requirements, to be eligible for the CEC. They must also be able to demonstrate that their professional experience has benefited the Canadian economy and society.

One of the primary advantages of the CEC programme is that it gives preference to applicants who are currently in Canada and have a solid link to the Canadian job market. Those who have already established themselves in Canada through job or study may find it easier to transfer to permanent status as a result of this.

For such more question on foreign:

https://brainly.com/question/30104981

#SPJ4

ener much

Explanation:

Podriamos hacer uso de las 3 erres (reducir, reciclar y rehusar), comprar productos hechos en Mexico, bajar el consumo excesivo / compras compulsivas.

In Moler v. State, the court allowed the jury to disregard the expert opinion that Moler was legally insane at the time of the offense, stating that the ultimate issue of sanity is a question of law and not a medical or scientific one. The role of precedent in this case is important because it reflects the long-standing legal principle that the ultimate issue of guilt or innocence is a question of fact for the jury, not a question of law for the expert.

The court justified this by arguing that expert testimony on mental state is not binding on the jury and that it is the jury's responsibility to weigh the evidence and decide whether the defendant had the required mental state to commit the crime.

The role of precedent in essential as this principle has been established in previous cases, such as Durham v. United States, where the court held that expert opinion on mental state is admissible but not conclusive.

Therefore, the court in Moler v. State followed the precedent and allowed the jury to decide whether the defendant had the required mental state to commit the crime, based on all the evidence presented, including the expert opinion.

To know more about role of precedent:

https://brainly.com/question/2033336

#SPJ4

_____The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given below:

Read Moler v. State Case and answer the following: what justification was offered by the court for permitting the jury to disregard the expert opinion that moler was, in fact, legally insane at the time of the offense? discuss the role of precedent in your response.

Answer:

where is the whole picture?

Explanation:

Answer:

We need the whole picture kind sir/mam.

We need to see the puzzle, also does this have to do with out history our current jobs?

The Clean Air Act that President Bush implemented in 1990 was designed to address the issue of air pollution in the United States.

The purpose of the Clean Air Act was to protect public health and the environment by regulating emissions of air pollutants from various sources, such as industrial facilities, vehicles, and power plants.

The Clean Air Act of 1990 included several key provisions, including:

Setting new air quality standards: The Clean Air Act set new standards for various air pollutants, including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter, to protect public health and the environment.

Controlling emissions from vehicles: The Clean Air Act required that new cars, trucks, and buses meet strict emissions standards, which led to the development of cleaner and more efficient technologies.

Reducing acid rain: The Clean Air Act established a cap-and-trade program to reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from power plants, which helped to reduce acid rain in the United States.

Addressing ozone depletion: The Clean Air Act phased out the production of ozone-depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which contributed to the depletion of the ozone layer.

For such more question on Clean Air Act

https://brainly.com/question/10288474

#SPJ4

To complete the site selection report for the YMCA in Edmond, Oklahoma, I would follow several steps outlined in the textbook. These steps include conducting a feasibility study, analyzing the site characteristics, assessing community needs, and evaluating potential risks and benefits.

Feasibility Study: I would begin by conducting a feasibility study for each location under consideration. This study would involve analyzing factors such as demographics, market demand, competition, and economic indicators. For example, I would examine the population growth rate in the Edmond area, income levels, and trends in health and fitness participation.

Site Characteristics: Next, I would analyze the specific characteristics of each location. This would include evaluating factors such as size, accessibility, visibility, zoning regulations, infrastructure, and proximity to amenities. For instance, I would assess the available parking space, the ease of transportation access, and the visibility of each location from major roads.

Community Needs: It is crucial to assess the community's needs to ensure the YMCA can effectively serve the target population. This would involve conducting surveys, interviews, or focus groups with residents to gather information on their preferences and expectations. Additionally, I would research existing community facilities and programs to identify any gaps or opportunities for the YMCA to address.

Risk and Benefit Analysis: To evaluate potential risks and benefits, I would consider factors like operational costs, revenue potential, environmental impact, and potential partnerships. For example, I would assess the cost of acquiring or leasing each location, ongoing maintenance expenses, and the revenue-generating potential through membership fees or program offerings. Additionally, I would evaluate the potential for collaborations with schools, healthcare providers, or local businesses.

By following these steps, the site selection report would provide a comprehensive analysis of each location's suitability for the YMCA in Edmond. It would prioritize the locations based on their alignment with the community's needs, financial viability, and overall potential for success.

For more questions on feasibility study

https://brainly.com/question/30985089

#SPJ8

Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code

Explanation:

I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad  answer lol

The majority of the nearly 19,000 law enforcement organisations in the US are state and municipal, and local police departments, which employ around 650,000 officers, account for the vast majority of law enforcement personnel.

The main goal of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) is to help the law enforcement authorities in the states and union territories uphold law and order and quell insurrection.

As each level of government has an own enforcement organisation. You have town, county, state, and federal government as you move up. Each of these is autonomous, and many of their chief executives are chosen by the public.

To know more about federal government, visit:

brainly.com/question/371257

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The courtroom workgroup, which includes all individuals who routinely play a part in the workings of the court and case processing, is the core of the courtroom community. However, the courtroom triad — a subset of the workgroup consisting of the judge, prosecutor, and defense — is most instrumental in determining going rates for felony cases.