The American suffrage movement fought for women's voting rights for a very long time.
What do you vote for?Voting is a procedure that a body, such as a voter or assembly, can use to come to an agreement or express a viewpoint, usually following discussions, debates, or electioneering. Democracies choose their high-ranking officials through the electoral process.
What is the process of voting known as?Unanimous judgments may be seen as a symbol of social, political, or procedural unanimity, solidarity, and togetherness among groups. When there are no objections, a unanimous vote may tacitly or explicitly imply unanimity. When there are no objections, a unanimous vote may tacitly or explicitly imply unanimity.
To learn more about voting visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28941505
#SPJ4
All board members have 3 fundamental duties a)duty of care, b)duty of loyalty and, c)duty of obedience. If any 2 or more of these duties become in conflict which duty should take preference over other(s) and why?
what do antitrust laws help guard against?
Antitrust laws aim to prevent businesses from gaining too much market power and using it to harm consumers, limit innovation, or drive competitors out of business.
Antitrust laws are designed to protect consumers and promote fair competition in the marketplace by prohibiting monopolies, cartels, and other anti-competitive practices.
There are several key types of conduct that antitrust laws are designed to guard against:
Monopolization: Antitrust laws prohibit businesses from gaining and maintaining a monopoly in a given market. This can occur through various means, such as acquiring competitors, engaging in anti-competitive pricing practices, or controlling essential resources or infrastructure.
Price fixing: Antitrust laws prohibit businesses from colluding with one another to fix prices or otherwise manipulate the market. This can take many forms, such as agreeing to set prices at a certain level or limiting output to keep prices high.
Market allocation: Antitrust laws prohibit businesses from dividing up markets or customers amongst themselves, as this can limit competition and harm consumers.
Tying arrangements: Antitrust laws prohibit businesses from requiring customers to purchase one product in order to obtain another. This can be used to leverage market power in one area to gain an advantage in another.
By preventing these and other anti-competitive practices, antitrust laws aim to promote competition, innovation, and consumer welfare in the marketplace.
To know more about antitrust laws, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29304553#
#SPJ11
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
the colorado real estate commission on its own motion can investigate:
Answer:
The Colorado Real Estate Commission on its own motion can investigate any licensee or unlicensed person if it has reason to believe that the licensee or unlicensed person has violated any provision of the Colorado Real Estate License Law or any rule or regulation promulgated by the Commission. The Commission can also investigate any person who has engaged in any conduct that would be grounds for discipline of a licensee, even if that person is not licensed. The Commission has the authority to conduct investigations, hold hearings, issue subpoenas, and take other actions as necessary to enforce the provisions of the Colorado Real Estate License Law.
hope it helps you.
what type of contract is a license holder prohibited from completing because doing so would be considered the unauthorized practice of law?
A license holder is prohibited from completing a type of contract because doing so would be considered the unauthorized practice of law. The type of contract is a "fill-in-the-blank" contract.
Fill-in-the-blank contracts are contracts in which blanks are left for the user to fill in with terms and information that are specific to the contract's subject matter. The user then completes the contract by filling in the blanks with the necessary information.
The main problem with fill-in-the-blank contracts is that they are a one-size-fits-all approach to contracts, and they do not take into account the unique circumstances and needs of each party.The unauthorized practice of law occurs when someone who is not a licensed attorney or a licensed legal service provider engages in activities that are reserved for attorneys or legal service providers. Completing a fill-in-the-blank contract is considered the unauthorized practice of law because it involves the interpretation and application of legal terms, which is a legal service that is reserved for licensed attorneys.
To know more about licensed visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15829119
#SPJ11
in tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as:
In tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as "omission.
"Definition: Omission, in legal terms, is a term used to describe the failure to act when action is required. Omission means failing to act in a situation that calls for action. The person who is supposed to act in the given situation fails to act and hence the consequences of such inaction are faced. In tort law, the term omission is used to refer to the failure of one party to act or intervene in a given situation.
However, it is important to note that the omission is only punishable in law if the person had a duty to act or intervene, and if their inaction resulted in harm to another person. Thus, if a person has no duty to act or intervene, then they cannot be held liable for their inaction.
Learn more about tort law here:https://brainly.com/question/28213050
#SPJ11
In your own point of view,what should be the key or the best way that the employer must do to avoid violations of labor and employment laws?
Answer:
Hiring only legal workers
Classifying workers properly
paying accurate wages
Cover workers injuries received on the job
Explanation:
add me on snap? dominic9219
Stop Building the Wall
3 Pros and 3 cons
Answer:
The immediate withdrawal of building a border wall would bring some benefits. First, it would allow people who are asylum seekers to come. Secondly, it would redistribute more resources to the Department of Homeland Security. Finally, it would save the American people millions of dollars.
In contrast, the three cons of not having a border wall would be a possible increase in crime. Secondly, the flood of undocumented persons. Finally, as a country, we would be vulnerable to attack by any of our enemies on the world stage.
Explanation:
I hope this helps you develop your idea further.
Under the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if a lease does not state a clear expiration date, the lease is regarded as
Answer:
Hello. Under Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if the lease does not specify or make clear an expiration date, the lease will be regarded as: A tenancy from period-to-period.
Explanation:
Question does not ask for an explanation, so one will not be given. Have a nice day user.
1. State and explain the 5 ways in which an Agency can be created. The explanation should not be beyond 2 sentences each. (10 Marks)
2. Give two differences between each of the following:
i) Barter Transaction & Gift Transaction
ii) Bailment & Barter Transaction
iii) Bailment & Gift Transaction (6 Marks)
3. Give an example each of the following Types of Goods (3 Marks)
i) Specific Goods
ii) Unascertained Goods
iii) Future Goods
The five ways in which an Agency can be created are:
Express agreement: the parties enter into a formal agreement, either orally or in writing, outlining the terms of the agency relationship.
Implied agreement: the parties' conduct implies that one is acting as an agent for the other.
Apparent authority: the principal's actions or words lead a third party to believe that someone is acting as their agent, even if no agency relationship was intended.
Ratification: the principal retroactively approves an action taken by someone who was not originally acting as their agent.
Operation of law: an agency relationship is created by law, such as in the case of a parent and child.
How to explain the informationi) Barter transactions involve the exchange of goods or services for other goods or services without the use of money, while gift transactions involve the voluntary transfer of property or assets without the expectation of receiving anything in return.
ii) Bailment involves the transfer of possession of personal property from one party (the bailor) to another party (the bailee) for a specific purpose, while barter transactions involve the exchange of goods or services for other goods or services without the use of money.
iii) Bailment involves the transfer of possession of personal property from one party (the bailor) to another party (the bailee) for a specific purpose, while gift transactions involve the voluntary transfer of property or assets without the expectation of receiving anything in return.
Learn more about agency on
https://brainly.com/question/26253714
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements about the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are true, if any?
The true statements about the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is that its eliminates lifetime limits on total health care insurance payments by insurers. The Option E is correct.
What is the Affordable Care Act?In U.S., the Affordable Care Act is a reform signed into law by President Barack Obama in March 2010 which includes a list of health care policies intended to expand access to health insurance to millions of uninsured Americans.
The reform legislation expanded the Medicaid eligibility, created a health insurance exchanges, mandated that Americans purchase of health insurance and prohibited insurance companies from denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions.
Missing options "The ACA decides the insurance payments for dependents. The ACA limits the total number of surgeries for the insurers. The ACA provides major medical insurance with low deductibles to protect against catastrophic illnesses. The ACA requires employers to reimburse the cost of hospital stay of the insured. The ACA eliminates lifetime limits on total health care insurance payments by insurers.
Read more about Affordable Care Act
brainly.com/question/26495011
#SPJ1
_can be used to assess_
Answer:
Explanation:
Which method of estimating reliability would you use when the assessment instrument uses scales that have a range, such as strongly agree, agree, neutral,
Which crime is growing at such a significant rate that retailers should expect about a 10–15 percent annual increase of occurrences?
burglary
embezzlement
robbery
shoplifting
Answer:
I think robbery because of population growth.
The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally
The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is commonly known as tort law.
Tort law is a branch of law that handles wrongful actions and their consequences. In this situation, the broken window of your home caused by someone else is classified as negligence. Negligence refers to a breach of duty to take reasonable care that causes harm or loss to another person. The person who broke the window of your home was not careful enough to prevent such damage, and as a result, you experienced financial harm or loss due to the cost of repair or replacement of the window.
Therefore, you are entitled to seek financial compensation or restitution from the person who broke the window. In order to claim financial restitution, you must prove that the person who broke your window was negligent, that you experienced harm or loss, and that the harm or loss was a direct result of the other person's negligence. If you can prove all of these elements, then you have a strong case for financial restitution.
In the event that the person who broke your window refuses to pay for the damages or is unable to do so, you can take them to court, where a judge or jury will evaluate the evidence and determine whether you are entitled to financial restitution. In conclusion, the set of laws that allows you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is governed by tort law, specifically the principles of negligence.
Know more about Tort law here:
https://brainly.com/question/33013975
#SPJ8
what are the three competence expect from good/ideal citizens
Answer: Citizenship competencies allow for citizens to respect and defend human rights, to contribute actively to a peaceful living, to participate responsibly and constructively in the democratic processes and to respect and value plurality and differences.
Explanation:
The three competence expect from good/ideal citizens are that the citizenship competencies enable citizens to respect and defend human rights, actively contribute to peaceful living, responsibly and constructively participate in democratic processes.
What are the human rights?Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination.
Human rights are fundamental rights that all of us have simply by virtue of our humanity. They exemplify important societal values such as fairness, dignity, equality, and respect. They are a significant form of protection for all of us, especially those who may be subjected to abuse, neglect, or isolation.
Learn more about the human rights, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ5
the united states has many laws that prohibit the export of electronic waste to other countries. t/f
This is false that there are numerous laws in the US that forbid the export of electronic waste to other nations.
When it meets the expectations e-waste act, it is main to note that there are not one thing societies that straightforwardly accuse things or companies that do not practice e-waste reusing. There are no allied societies that demand electronics reusing.
While many electronic waste reusing programs and associations do reuse harmlessly, others transport the waste to different nations cause reusing in the United States is becoming more high-priced and less advantageous. This process is high-priced, and to avoid giving the many services that wanted to reuse e-waste formally, grown nations unjustly send their e-waste to underdeveloped countries for disposal. However, these underdeveloped countries do not have the wealth to reuse their e-waste in an official manner.
To know more about electronic waste refer to: https://brainly.com/question/15549433
#SPJ4
A man has been sentenced to prison for armed robbery, and admits guilt for the
deed. "But", he argues, "I'll never do anything of the kind again. I'm not insane or a
danger to society. I would be happier out of jail than in. My wife depends on me for
support and she and the children would be far happier if I were able to be the family
breadwinner again. As to the influence on others, almost no one would ever know
about it; you can keep the matter out of the newspapers and no one except you will
ever know that the crime was committed. Therefore, you should release me".
Assuming he is correct, what would you do?
Answer:
sentence him to 25 to life
Explanation:
laws are laws for a reason. a line in the sand is nothing if it is not enforce. this also leads to the old saying "if you can't do the time, then don't do the crime".
Why did Congress have so much trouble passing laws under the terms of
the Articles of Confederation?
Define discretionary decision making, explain why discretionary decision making occurs in the criminal courts and provide specific examples of prosecutorial discretion.
Discretionary decision making occurs in the criminal courts because the criminal justice system is complex and there are often multiple options for how to proceed in a case.
Prosecutors, in particular, have a great deal of discretion in deciding how to handle a case. This allows them to take into account factors such as the severity of the crime, the strength of the evidence, and the resources available.
What does discretionary decision making means?Making discretionary decisions means making decisions based on logic and judgment rather than pre-determined criteria.
It is common for the source of authority to provide criteria in relation to the decision when the authority for making a decision comes from legislation or an internal procedure.
The words "shall" or "must" usually imply that the decision maker must make a specific decision if certain criteria are met, whereas the words "may" or "should" give the decision maker more leeway in weighing various factors.
Read more about discretionary decision making
brainly.com/question/29509213
#SPJ1
Question 9 of 10
The most important reason to limit the information in the Complaint or the
Answer to the Complaint is that
A. the lawyers charge by the length of the document
B. the information might be used against you at the trial
C. you might make an error
D. the form only allows for a short explanation
Answer:
just took the test
Explanation:
b
Answer: B. the information might be used against you at the trial
passed in 1984, what does the national organ transplant act address?
The National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) was passed in 1984 and addressed various factors. One of its major functions was to address the nation's scarcity of organs for transplantation. It was enacted to improve the nation's organ transplantation system and to address the problem of organ shortages.
This Act also established the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), which is responsible for coordinating organ transplantation and overseeing the distribution of organs to those in need.
NOTA also addressed several other important factors related to organ transplantation. It prohibited the sale of organs and established penalties for individuals engaged in illegal organ trafficking. This provision was intended to protect the integrity and ethical considerations of organ transplantation.
Overall, the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) played a crucial role in addressing the scarcity of organs for transplantation in the United States by establishing the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and implementing regulations to ensure fair and ethical practices in organ allocation and transplantation.
You can learn more about NOTA at: https://brainly.com/question/24128652
#SPJ11
Imagine you are a state judge running for reelection and are challenged by a popular lawyer in town, who is known as a champion for the poor. The latest poll indicated that you were five percentage points behind your opponent. A local labor union with 20,000 due-paying members comes to you to offer not only large donations, but also actual union member votes, which would assure your victory. You know that the same union has filed a lawsuit in your court requesting that the current state law governing the amount of political contributions by labor unions be lifted.
Would you accept their support?
If yes, how would you justify your decision ethically?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
This is not a bribe as they are not asking for you to vote in their favor. You can take it without feeling guilty as they know that this could be highly illegal if they try and sway you over.
which of the following are the most common ways citizens typically get involved in the policy process?
Citizens typically get involved in the policy process by writing letters and emails
Writing letters and emails to their elected representatives, government officials, and other decision-makers is how citizens often participate in the policy-making process. This kind of participation is frequently referred to as grassroots advocacy or lobbying. Citizens can express their views, share their experiences and insights, and have their voices heard on key matters by submitting letters and emails.
This may affect the priorities of decision-makers and help shape policy decisions. Citizens can join advocacy groups and interest groups, attend town halls and other public events, participate in public meetings, and write letters and emails in addition to doing these things. Citizens can make their opinions known and influence policymaking by taking part in these activities.
Read more about the policy process on:
https://brainly.com/question/3006046
#SPJ4
Document examiners generally have a easy time of obtaining exemplars since most people volunteer them. true or false
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
I'm not sure but hope it will help you
Answer:
The answer is False.
Explanation:
Edmentum
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Agnozzi, who is deaf, purchased several items at a large chain discount store. One of the items was a large inflated doll for his daughter. Agnozzi went to a cash register near a store entrance to pay for his goods. The doll was so large that the sales clerk could not find a bag to hold it. With the doll under his arm and his other purchases in bags held in both hands, Agnozzi left the store. As he did so, a store employee stationed at the door to welcome people in and conduct security screens of those leaving, noticed the unbagged doll. The employee was instructed to stop and check the receipt of any party leaving the store with an unbagged item. As a consequence, she asked Agnozzi to stop. When he did not, she shouted at him to stop. Finally, she yelled, “Stop thief,” and gave chase. Other store personnel joined in and threw Agnozzi down onto the asphalt in the parking lot. Agnozzi finally was able to make the store personnel understand he was deaf and that he had the receipt in his pocket. Upon seeing the receipt they let him go with apologies. Although he was embarrassed, his clothes torn, and his skin scraped, Agnozzi accepted the apologies and left. Now he is reconsidering. Would it be ethical for Agnozzi to bring suit against the discount store? Does Agnozzi owe a duty to bring suit? If so, to whom and for what?
The question of whether it would be ethical for Agnozzi's experience at the store warrants a law suit is:
Based on the fact that Agnozzi did not have any clear indication that he was deaf, the store employee was well within his rights to give chase because he did not heed to the warnings. Ethics in a law suitThis refers to the moral grounds which a person has to challenge an experience or a situation which he or someone else was involved in that he believed was unfair and wants to contest it in a law court.
With this in mind, Agnozzi can file a law suit but he would unlikely get a favorable ruling from a judge based on the situation of things as they occurred.
Read more about ethical law suits here:
https://brainly.com/question/19569605
TRUE OR FALSE. according to freeman, the law gives de facto standing to non-stockholder groups.
The statement "according to freeman, the law gives de facto standing to non-stockholder groups" is False.
According to Freeman, the law does not give de facto standing to non-stockholder groups.
Freeman's stakeholder theory emphasizes that businesses should consider the interests of all stakeholders, not just stockholders.
However, in traditional legal frameworks, the primary duty of corporate directors and officers is to act in the best interests of the shareholders.
While there may be legal provisions in some jurisdictions that recognize certain stakeholder interests, such as employee protection or environmental regulations, the general legal structure does not explicitly grant de facto standing to non-stockholder groups.
Freeman's stakeholder theory promotes a broader perspective of corporate responsibility, but it does not reflect the current legal framework that primarily prioritizes shareholder interests.
For more such questions on stockholder, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29629238
#SPJ11
TRUE/FALSE. the supreme court has ruled that deceptive tactics in extracting confessions are unconstitutional.
The given statement, " The supreme court has ruled that deceptive tactics in extracting confessions are unconstitutional." is false because The United States Supreme Court has allowed police to falsely claim that a suspect's companion admitted when he had not, and to claim that they retrieved a suspect's fingerprints at a crime scene when there were none.
According to constitutional law, the government may not force confessions, as established by the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and the due-process restriction against admitting involuntary confessions into court. To determine whether a defendant's confession was voluntary, reviewing courts typically conduct a fact-specific inquiry into the totality of the circumstances, including the defendant's personal attributes; the situations under which the confession was obtained; and the conduct of the police.
The United States Supreme Court has permitted police to falsely claim that a suspect's accomplice confessed when he had not, and to have recovered a suspect's fingerprints at a crime scene when there were none, deeming such conduct inadequate to render the defendant's confession inadmissible. State courts have allowed police to deceive defendants about a variety of factual topics, such as falsely claiming that DNA evidence and satellite photographs of the crime site exist.
Learn more about Supreme Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/341135
#SPJ4
you switch a track to save 5 innocent people or let them die, what would you do
Answer:
I mean if i dont know those 5 people i would just let them die
Explanation:
typically, the most important elections on a state’s political calendar are
Typically, the most important elections on a state's political calendar are the gubernatorial elections, state legislative elections, and midterm elections.
Gubernatorial elections allow voters to choose the chief executive of their state, who wields considerable power and influence over a range of issues, including education, healthcare, economy, and public safety. These elections often attract significant attention, media coverage, and campaign spending, as they shape the political landscape and can have long-lasting impacts on the state's trajectory.
The outcomes of gubernatorial elections can also have broader implications for national politics, as state governors play a crucial role in shaping policy debates and party dynamics at the federal level.
Learn more about elections: https://brainly.com/question/29628143
#SPJ11