It established that "American citizens who are eighteen years of age or older" have the right to vote and lowered the voting age from 21 to 18.
What do you voting for?Voting is a procedure that a group, such as an electorate or gathering, can utilize to come to an agreement or express a viewpoint, usually following discussions, debates, or election campaigns. Democracies choose their high-level officials through the electoral process.
Which right is called right to voting?Each citizen's right to participate in the management of public affairs, the right to vote and be elected, and the right to access public service are all recognized and upheld by Article 25 of the Covenant.
To know more about vote visit:
brainly.com/question/21093353
#SPJ4
An example of innovative thinking is changing an old manufacturing process to save time and money.
True
False
Based on problem-solving strategy skills, it is true that an example of innovative thinking is changing an old manufacturing process to save time and money.
This is because innovation is a term used to describe the successful use of new ideas to create something better than the existing version.
Innovation usually involves establishing, improving, and executing a new commodity, process or service, to create efficiency, effectiveness, or competitive benefit.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "True."
Learn more about innovation here: https://brainly.com/question/19969274
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
Which is the correct MLA format for a parenthetical citation of this article?
You must enclose the author's last name and the page number in parentheses when using parenthetical citations in MLA format. Use the first few words of the title or webpage if there is no author.
How should I cite this book in parentheses using the MLA style?The author's last name and the page number from which the quotation or paraphrase is extracted are used in MLA in-text citations, for instance: (Smith 163). Do not include a page number in the parenthetical citation if the source does not utilize page numbers: (Smith).
What does an MLA parenthetical citation look like?The author's last name and a page number are used in parentheses in MLA format; for instance: (Field 122). You must cite the source when using a direct quotation in a sentence.
To know more about parenthetical citation, visit:
brainly.com/question/24440009
#SPJ4
What is the best method of submitting evidence to a crime lab?
Answer:
The best method of submitting evidence to a crime lab would be through personal delivery. Shipments through mail may be lost or misplaced, causing a contamination of the evidence and rendering it useless. The safe transportation of the evidence to a crime lab can only be assured through personal delivery.
when liability is assessed without the guilty-mind criterion, it is known as ______ liability.
When liability is assessed without the guilty-mind criterion, it is known as strict liability.
The term strict liability refers to liability that is determined without regard to guilt mind. A person can be held legally accountable for losses or harms brought on by their actions, regardless of what they intended or felt at the time. This legal principle is known as strict liability.
It is not necessary to demonstrate the defendant's negligence or malicious intent when there is strict liability. The focus should be on the act itself and whether it was harmful. Strict liability is frequently used in situations involving inherently risky activities, such as managing wild animals, producing hazardous materials, or engaging in risky activities.
Learn more about strict liability at:
brainly.com/question/32157948
#SPJ4
The supreme court on monday rejected an appeal seeking to give american citizenship to people born in which territory?.
The Supreme Court ruled that he had been unfairly picked out by the police due to his race.Chinese immigrant Lee Yick conducted a laundry business out of a wooden structure in California.
A legislation that was in effect at the time (the end of the 19th century) stated that this type of business could not be operated in a wooden structure without a specific licence. The majority of the laundry facilities were owned by Chinese immigrants, yet this permit was not obtained for them.The Nationality Acts of 1790 and 1870, which stipulate that in order to qualify for US citizenship, a person must either be “white” or a “native American,” were the legal bases on which the US Supreme Court denied US citizenship to Japanese nationals. According to the law of the soil, every person born within the boundaries or within the territories of the United States is immediately granted citizenship, regardless of their background or family history. The law of the soil also grants children the nationality of the country in which they were born, and this is recognized throughout almost all of the world.
To know more about citizenship visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3588983
#SPJ4
the ascertion that non formal institutions have no role to play at the processing stage of the systems. comment on it
Explanation:
The assertion that non-formal institutions have no role to play at the Processing Stage of the Systems Theory is an empty rhetoric.
What is the difference between being polite and being passive? Give some example
Answer:
- Polite Is having or showing behavior that is respectful and considerate of other people.
- Passive accepting or allowing what happens or what others do, without active response or resistance.
Example: Jack is liked by other for being respectful and considerate. Mark is a person who accepts everyone but also negative vibes.
a standing committee in the u.s. congress is a committee that isa.only found in the u.s. senateb.temporaryc.regulates how people stand in public, as opposed to sitting downd.contains members of both housese.permanent
A standing committee in the United States Congress is a permanent committee composed of members of both the Senate and the House of Representatives. Here option E is the correct answer.
These committees are responsible for conducting hearings, reviewing bills, and overseeing various issues that fall under their jurisdiction. Each standing committee is dedicated to a specific area of legislation, such as foreign relations, agriculture, or finance.
The role of standing committees is vital to the legislative process, as they play a significant role in shaping the laws and policies that govern the United States. Standing committees have the power to draft, amend, and recommend legislation to the full House or Senate for a vote. They also have the authority to conduct investigations, hold hearings, and call witnesses to testify before them.
The members of standing committees are chosen by the Speaker of the House or the Senate Majority Leader, depending on the chamber in which the committee is located. Typically, membership on a standing committee is based on seniority, expertise, and party affiliation. Members may also serve on more than one committee.
To learn more about the standing committee
https://brainly.com/question/11621970
#SPJ4
Complete question:
A standing committee in the u.s. congress is a committee that is
a. only found in the u.s. senate
b. temporary
c. regulates how people stand in public, as opposed to sitting down
d. contains members of both houses
e. permanent
a law providing that no legal assistant may serve on boards of directors of national banks would be a(n):
a law providing that no legal assistant may serve on boards of directors of national banks would be Constitutional in nature.
About Law
The exact meaning of law is up for debate, but it is generally understood to be a set of regulations that are made and enforced by social or maybe a government structures to control behaviour. It has been called both a science and the practise of justice in diverse contexts. Statutes can be created by a group of legislators or a single lawmaker; the administration can issue decrees & regulations; or judges can set precedent, mainly in common law systems. Private individuals have the power to enact legally binding agreements, such as arbitration clauses that substitute alternative dispute resolution procedures for traditional court action.
To know more about common law systems:
brainly.com/question/12650394
#SPJ4
We are going to cancel the regional sales meeting …………. the big snowstorm has shut down airports and all major airlines are grounded.
A. although
B. despite
C. unless
D. since
The word that best completes the underlined word from the given sentence is:
D. SinceFrom the given question, we can see that an action is about to be taken, but there is a problem that cannot allow them to proceed. This problem is a bug snowstorm which has stopped all vehicular and air travel.
As a result of this, we need to use a word that highlights this problem and shows the reason why the regional sales meeting cannot proceed as planned.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D because the transitional word "Since" is used to show why the meeting could not take place.
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/12644119
Which of the following is considered a disadvantage of probation and parole?
Select one:
A. Relative lack of punishment
B. Increased employment
C. Increased use of community services
D. Reduced risk of criminal socialization
A disadvantage of probation and parole is relative lack of punishment. Probation is a method of criminal sentencing that enables individuals to stay out of prison. Parole is similar but has a more limited scope. Offenders are released from prison early but must adhere to a set of terms and conditions.
Probation and parole are intended to rehabilitate offenders while also keeping them out of jail. However, probation and parole also have drawbacks. Probation and parole, for example, are frequently seen as insufficient punishments. Probation may be seen as a way for people to avoid prison time for serious offenses, and parole may be seen as a way for people to be released from prison before their sentence is complete. While probation and parole can be used effectively to keep people out of jail, there are also issues to consider.
To know more about Parole visit-
brainly.com/question/30777425
#SPJ11
FILL IN THE BLANK. A declaration of __________ compliance affirms that the organization's membership has been trained to specific levels and the command system's use is institutionalized.
A declaration of organizational compliance affirms that the organization's membership has been trained to specific levels and the command system's use is institutionalized.
An organizational compliance declaration is a formal statement or affirmation made by an organization to demonstrate its adherence to specific standards, regulations, or requirements. In the context of the given statement, it refers to the organization's commitment to compliance in terms of training its members and establishing a robust command system.
The declaration asserts that the organization has taken measures to ensure that its members are adequately trained to specific levels. This training typically includes providing the necessary knowledge, skills, and competencies required to carry out their roles and responsibilities effectively within the organization. It may involve training related to legal and regulatory compliance, safety protocols, ethical conduct, or any other relevant areas depending on the nature of the organization and its operations.
Additionally, the declaration emphasizes that the use of the command system within the organization is institutionalized. The command system refers to the established structure and processes that enable effective decision-making, coordination, and communication within the organization. By institutionalizing the command system, the organization ensures that it is consistently applied and integrated into its operations, promoting efficiency, accountability, and compliance with established protocols.
The purpose of a declaration of organizational compliance is to provide assurance to stakeholders, such as regulatory bodies, clients, partners, and the public, that the organization is committed to maintaining high standards of compliance. It demonstrates the organization's proactive approach in training its members and establishing a robust command system to mitigate risks, ensure operational effectiveness, and uphold legal and regulatory obligations.
Organizational compliance is a vital aspect of risk management and governance within organizations across various sectors. By making a declaration of compliance, organizations showcase their dedication to maintaining a culture of compliance and fostering a responsible and ethical environment.
It is important to note that specific compliance requirements may vary depending on the industry, jurisdiction, and the nature of the organization's activities. Organizations should stay informed about relevant laws, regulations, and best practices to ensure ongoing compliance and adapt their training and command systems accordingly.
In summary, a declaration of organizational compliance affirms that the organization's membership has been trained to specific levels and the command system's use is institutionalized. It demonstrates the organization's commitment to maintaining compliance with relevant standards, regulations, and requirements, promoting a culture of responsibility and accountability.
Learn more about organizational compliance here
https://brainly.com/question/30090795
#SPJ11
roe v. wade and other major court cases often make their way through the court system ending with the court of final appeal, more commonly known as
There are three main levels to the federal court system: district courts, which are the trial court, circuit courts, which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the last level of appeal in the federal system, are the three levels of appeal.
What is the court's final decision?
the final court decision that settles all disputed issues and the parties' rights in relation to those issues. The only decisions left after a final judgment are how to enforce the judgment, whether to award costs, and whether to appeal.
What are the three ways that an appeal to the Supreme Court can be handled?
appeals through state and federal courts, appeals through the original jurisdiction.
Learn more about Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ4
E. E. Schattschneider and other political scientists like him believe that interest groups are valuable to the democratic process by doing which of the following?
According to E. E. Schattschneider and other political scientists serving as a point of access to government providing an avenue whereby people can influence the policy process.
Any organization involved in politics or public policy can benefit from having political scientists on staff. With their knowledge, they may assist your organization in creating plans for achieving objectives or influencing public opinion. Before employing a political scientist, review example hiring materials in this guide and learn about the tasks of a political scientist. A political scientist researches political ideas and examines how politics affects the advancement of society. In order to provide light on the potential repercussions of certain policy actions or events, they conduct historical study. Political scientists can work in practically any industry, including education, nonprofit work, and technical services, and many of them are employed by the government.
Learn more about political scientists here:
https://brainly.com/question/28667423
#SPJ4
How would you explain gender differences in the crime rate ? Why do you think males are more violent than females?
The State of Louisiana had earlier been a French territory, and therefore, has greatly been influenced by the French civil laws. True False
The given statement, "The State of Louisiana had earlier been a French territory, and therefore, has greatly been influenced by the French civil laws" is true.
What is the state of Louisiana?Louisiana is a southern state of the United States. It was established in 1812, and its capital is Baton Rouge. Louisiana is renowned for its long and varied history, which has been influenced by a variety of cultures over time. Louisiana was initially a French colony, and it was governed under the French legal system. As a result, even though the United States acquired Louisiana in 1803, it continued to be governed under the French legal system.
Even after being a part of the United States, Louisiana continued to use the Napoleonic Code, or French Civil Law, which is one of the world's oldest legal codes. As a result, the state's legal system is heavily influenced by French civil law.
Learn more about Napoleonic Code
https://brainly.com/question/2895638
#SPJ11
When a person has progressed to drug addiction, ..
A. they can usually still stop on their own.
B. professional help is usually necessary to stop.
C. there is no way to stop the use.
What was the law that required men of certain ages to serve in the military?.
Answer:
selective service act
Explanation:
congress passed the selective service act into law wich required men in the U.S. between ages 21 and 30 to register for military service.
Uniform laws apply in all states, including those in which the laws have not been adopted. True or False.
False. Uniform laws are proposed legal guidelines that are drafted by the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) or other legal organizations with the aim of creating consistency across state lines in specific areas of law. These laws, however, do not automatically apply to all states.
For a uniform law to be effective in a particular state, the state's legislature must adopt the law. Each state has the option to adopt the uniform law as it is, modify it to fit the state's unique requirements, or reject it altogether. Therefore, uniform laws apply only in those states that have chosen to adopt them, either in their entirety or with modifications.
Adopting a uniform law provides numerous benefits, such as promoting consistency and predictability in legal matters, simplifying interstate transactions, and minimizing conflicts between states. Despite these advantages, it is important to note that uniform laws do not automatically become binding in all states. They must be adopted by the individual state legislatures before they can be enforced within a particular jurisdiction.
learn more about legal
https://brainly.com/question/32393152
#SPJ11
david is charged and tried for a cybercrime under a federal law. the jury acquits him (finds david not guilty). colorado, the state where david lived when committing the cybercrime, wants to charge and try david for state fraud claims arising out of the cybercrime. is this permitted under the fifth amendment?
Yes, it is generally permitted for a state to charge and try an individual for state crimes even after the individual has been acquitted of federal crimes arising from the same conduct.
The Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause only applies to federal criminal prosecutions, and does not bar state prosecutions for the same conduct. Therefore, Colorado would be within its rights to charge and try David for state fraud claims arising out of the cybercrime, even though he was acquitted by the federal government. The Fifth Amendment's protection against double jeopardy would not apply in this situation.
Learn more about federal crimes
https://brainly.com/question/5397409
#SPJ4
hat justification was offered by the court for permitting the jury to disregard the expert opinion that moler was, in fact, legally insane at the time of the offense? discuss the role of precedent in your response.
In Moler v. State, the court allowed the jury to disregard the expert opinion that Moler was legally insane at the time of the offense, stating that the ultimate issue of sanity is a question of law and not a medical or scientific one. The role of precedent in this case is important because it reflects the long-standing legal principle that the ultimate issue of guilt or innocence is a question of fact for the jury, not a question of law for the expert.
The court justified this by arguing that expert testimony on mental state is not binding on the jury and that it is the jury's responsibility to weigh the evidence and decide whether the defendant had the required mental state to commit the crime.
The role of precedent in essential as this principle has been established in previous cases, such as Durham v. United States, where the court held that expert opinion on mental state is admissible but not conclusive.
Therefore, the court in Moler v. State followed the precedent and allowed the jury to decide whether the defendant had the required mental state to commit the crime, based on all the evidence presented, including the expert opinion.
To know more about role of precedent:
https://brainly.com/question/2033336
#SPJ4
_____The given question is incomplete, the complete question is given below:
Read Moler v. State Case and answer the following: what justification was offered by the court for permitting the jury to disregard the expert opinion that moler was, in fact, legally insane at the time of the offense? discuss the role of precedent in your response.
In January 2001 a New York man attended a family birthday party at a Benihana restaurant, where chefs, while cooking at the table, routinely throw pieces of food for diners to catch with their mouths. The man wrenched his neck while ducking a piece of flying shrimp, requiring treatment by several doctors. By that summer, doctors determined surgery was necessary to treat numbness in his arm. Five months after surgery, he checked into the hospital with a high fever and died. The family sued Benihana for $10 million in damages, claiming that the fever was the result of surgery, which in turn was the result of the chef’s actions in throwing food at diners. Do you believe that Benihana should be liable for the man’s death? Why or why not?
Based on the information given, Benihana should not be liable for the man’s death because he had an underlying disease.
From the information given, Benihana isn't responsible. The man had a high fever. Also, his autopsy showed septicemia which is blood poisoning. He was as well suffering from gout.
The infection that he had could also have been due to exposure to dead animals which made him have septicemia. It should be noted that his death was not because of the neck wrenching that he had. Therefore, Benihana should not be liable for the man’s death.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25449412
What is definiton of civil law?
Civil law is the part of a country's set of laws which is concerned with the private affairs of citizens, for example marriage and property ownership, rather than with crime.
What is the function of civil law?Civil law pursuits to deal with disputes between people or organisations. Civil regulation instances normally (but no longer always) involve compensation or an agreement or judgement bearing on to finances. Civil law instances are filed by personal parties, while criminal instances are normally filed through the government.
What is the significance of civil law?Today, internationally the philosophical traits and criminal rights of the person citizen are explicated in public law and the role of civil regulation is to furnish the institutions, doctrines and transactions of civil society and business law.
Learn more about civil law here:
https://brainly.com/question/493036#SPJ1(6)How can companies ensure they are not subject to lawsuits for
breaches of customary international law?
Companies can ensure they are not subject to lawsuits for breaches of customary international law by adhering to international legal standards and conducting thorough due diligence.
To mitigate the risk of lawsuits related to breaches of customary international law, companies should first familiarize themselves with the relevant international legal frameworks and norms. They should identify the specific customary international laws that apply to their operations, such as human rights, labor rights, and environmental protection. Once identified, companies should implement robust compliance programs that align with these standards.
A crucial step is conducting thorough due diligence throughout their supply chains and business operations. This includes assessing and monitoring potential risks, such as human rights abuses, environmental harm, or unethical practices. By identifying and addressing these risks proactively, companies can prevent or mitigate potential breaches of customary international law.
To know more about lawsuits
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ11
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
Why do communal cells cause problems?
Answer:
First offenders can easily be harmed by hardened offenders.
Explanation:
First offenders are people that have done a small or minor crime. Such as debt, reckless driving while drinking or etc. So if they put a person who has done a small offense in a cell with another person that has committed a murder or an assault to harm another person, or let's say a heavy offense. That person who done a small offense will have a chance of possibly dying or having a injury and will not be able to return home safely or in the state they were in when they came.
when the relationship of a sales agent with the sales agent's sponsoring broker terminates, the terminating party shall immediately notify:
when the relationship of a sales agent with the sales agent's sponsoring broker terminates, the terminating party shall immediately notify the sponsoring broker when their relationship terminates.
It is usually required that the terminating party, which is the sales agent, promptly notify the sponsoring broker when the relationship between a sales agent and their sponsoring broker ends. An important step in the process of dissolving their professional association is this notification.
Both parties can begin the necessary steps and take the proper actions to address any legal financial or contractual obligations related to the termination by promptly informing the sponsoring broker about the termination.
An orderly transition and the assurance that all parties are informed of the change in the agent's status are made possible by prompt communication, which also enables the smooth continuation of business operations and client relationships.
Learn more about sales agent at:
brainly.com/question/29885100
#SPJ4
Can law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Cos they have been bestowed with the power by the Government of their country and also they have enough financial fund and weapons to be able to combat crime
Yes the law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own because they have been given authority by the government of their nation, as well as sufficient resources and weapons to fight crime.
What is a law enforcement agency?A law enforcement agency (LEA) is any government organization tasked with upholding the law. It is referred to as operating inside a jurisdiction when LEAs have some kind of restriction on how they can use their authority. By allowing the exchange of information required for law enforcement between LEAs inside those countries, LEAs that operate across a number of countries, such as Europol, tend to support law enforcement efforts rather than actively enforcing laws. An international law enforcement agency, like Interpol, has authority over and/or conducts operations across national borders in several different countries. A multinational law enforcement agency is one that employs people from various nations but normally only operates in one nation or region of a nation.
To learn more about law enforcement agencies, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14328441
#SPJ2
How do elections impact the supreme court? Discuss how the roles of the president and senate affect the supreme court and how the political makeup of the senate and president can impact it.
Elections can impact the Supreme Court through the roles of the President and Senate. The President nominates justices to the Court, and the Senate has the power to confirm or reject those nominations. The political makeup of the Senate and President can greatly impact the composition and decisions of the Court.
When a Supreme Court vacancy arises, the President has the authority to nominate a new justice. This nomination is then sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration. The Senate Judiciary Committee holds confirmation hearings and then votes to send the nomination to the full Senate for a vote. The Senate can confirm the nominee by a simple majority vote, or they can reject the nominee.
The political makeup of the Senate and President can play a significant role in the confirmation process. If the President and Senate are of the same political party, it is generally easier for the President to get their nominee confirmed.
To know more about Elections, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/11185151
#SPJ4