Which branch of government has the authority to enact law?.

Answer: opioids

Explanation:

opioid painkillers, Heroin, Vicodin, Fentanyl, Percocet, depressants

Answer:because the people are greedy and want more money they cant just help lol

Explanation:

Answer:

1.  The Supreme Court serves as the ultimate arbitrator of the law.

2.  Reviews appeal to debatable legal issues of considerable public concern.

3.  ensures that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its power.

4.  Serves as the Constitution's guardian and interpreter.

Explanation:

The September 11 attacks, also known as the 9/11 attacks, were a string of hijackings of aeroplanes and  bombings against American targets carried out in 2001 by 19 militants linked to the Islamic extremist group al-Qaeda.

.

They were the deadliest terrorist attacks ever to take place on American soil. The attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C. resulted in a great deal of loss and destruction and led to a massive American commitment to fight terrorism.

All 19 terrorists were killed, along with 2,750 victims in New York, 184 at the Pentagon, and 40 in Pennsylvania (where one of the hijacked flights crashed after the passengers tried to reclaim the jet).

Learn more about 9/11 attack here

https://brainly.com/question/12200342

#SPJ1

Answer:

Well, as this question was a long time ago, I think you don't need the answer anymore.

But I would love if you love me forever.

XD

(ITS NOT A JOKE)

Explanation:

ANSWER:

Why Hamilton Promoted Presidential Pardon Power

Eugene Debs, the Socialist presidential candidate pardoned by President Harding in 1921.

The highest number of pardons in the 20th century were issued by Franklin D. Roosevelt, who in his three-plus terms in office, issued 3,600 pardons and commutations of sentences, the vast majority of which were full pardons. FDR averaged about 880 pardons for each year he was in office – the highest in modern times. The rate then gradually declined, so that by the time of Presidents Nixon and Ford, the rate was about 150 per year. Jimmy Carter, in addition to the Vietnam War amnesty, granted a little over 125 a year. Under Ronald Reagan, the numbers dropped further, to about 50 per year; and under George H.W. Bush, the number of pardons fell even more, to fewer than 20 a year. Bill Clinton increased the rate back to about 50 a year, roughly the same as Reagan. Under George W. Bush, the numbers plummeted again, down to fewer than 25 a year. President Obama changed things little, averaging slightly more than 25 a year – although he issued a record number of commutations of sentences, almost all of which were for drug offenses.

Bottom line: the Constitutional power of presidential pardon, viewed as essential to the administration of justice by the Constitution’s Framers, has all but been ignored by recent presidents, even as the United States continues to display the highest rate of incarceration, and largest number of prisoners, in the world. The total U.S. prison population (state and federal) skyrocketed in the 1980s due to mandatory sentencing laws, and although decreasing slightly over the past ten years, is still about five times greater than it was in 1980. The decrease is largely due to reductions in sentences for drug-related offenses.

The total number of federal inmates today is about 185,000, which is over seven times greater than in 1980, and about 23 times greater than it was 90 years ago – all of which reflects the “federalization” of crime, i.e., the expanding number of offenses defined by Congress and the Justice Department as federal crimes. So, as the number of federal prisoners has gone way up, the number of pardons issued has gone way down. And this despite widespread of exposure of prosecutorial misconduct and abuse by the FBI and the Justice Department over decades.

The Founding Fathers and the Framers – most notably George Washington and Alexander Hamilton – saw the pardon power as essential to mitigate or remedy injustice, but modern Presidents have turned a blind eye to this explicit constitutional provision, because of pragmatism and political cowardice. If President Trump takes steps to reverse this decline, it will be for the good of the nation.

image_pdfimage_print

Explanation:

Nigeria's representative government faces fractures in accountability, disconnection between representatives and citizens, self-interest in political parties, electoral irregularities, and ethnic/religious divisions.

In Nigeria's representative government, five fractures can be identified.

Firstly, there is a lack of accountability, as elected officials often engage in corruption and misuse of public funds.

Secondly, there is a disconnection between representatives and the citizens they are supposed to represent, resulting in a gap in understanding and addressing the needs of the people.

Thirdly, political parties prioritize personal interests over public welfare, leading to a lack of effective governance.

Fourthly, electoral irregularities and voter suppression undermine the democratic process.

Lastly, ethnic and religious divisions contribute to a fragmented society, hampering unity and cooperation among representatives. These fractures challenge the effectiveness and integrity of Nigeria's democracy.

Learn more about Nigeria democracy on:

https://brainly.com/question/30451398

#SPJ1

Answer:

program is the role played by the dispatcher during an emergency incident. ... Fortunately, the second house fire was discovered by a police officer while responding to the first house fire. ... During an in-progress incident, I was able to put 2 & 2 together and ...

Explanation:

you have to study

Answer:

This is going to vary, but I think by and large, it would go like this:

Explanation:

You call 911 requesting the police. The initial call-taker may be from the police or fire department or an operator. In most cases, the call will be transferred to the correct department. Now, you are speaking to the police call-taker. In a small town, the call-taker and dispatcher may be the same person. You may actually hear them asking questions of you and then broadcasting it immediately over the police radio. But in most cities, the police call-taker would start interviewing you as to what happened, the location (even if it is displayed), descriptions of suspects, need for EMS, weapons seen, last known direction of travel of suspects, etc. The more information the officer responding has, the better chance they have of safely catching the suspect. This information is relayed to the dispatcher who would broadcast it to an available nearby police officer. There are times when an officer wants certain information and needs the dispatcher to request the call-taker to call you back to get more information.

Answer:

6 months

hey!

To apply for a provisional driver's license, a driver must be at least 16 and under 18 years old. The person must have held a learner's permit for at least six months prior to applying for a provisional driver's license.

The driver also must have at least 100 hours of driving experience supervised by a person at least 21 years of age who has had a valid driver's license for at least three years. Alternatively, the driver can complete a traffic safety education course and at least 50 hours of supervised driving experience.

hope that helps! :)

Answer:

The correct answer is 6 months.

Explanation:

MARK ME AS BRIANLIST

The constitutional principle that is BEST described by Pericles in the given statement  rule of law. Option B

Pericles mentions that "everyone is equal before the law" when it comes to settling private disputes. This highlights the principle of the rule of law, which means that all individuals, regardless of their social status or position, are subject to and protected by the law. The rule of law ensures that no one is above the law and that the legal system treats everyone fairly and equally.

While other principles like individual rights, limited government, and representative government are important aspects of a democracy, Pericles specifically emphasizes the equality before the law, which aligns with the principle of the rule of law.

Learn more about rule of law at https://brainly.com/question/820417

#SPJ1

Answer:

Yes, he is because there was an undisclosed principal who failed to perform.

Explanation:

A contract is the agreement between two or more parties to be performed at a specified time period and based upon a pre-defined sum of money for the execution of a contract. An agreement signed by mutual concern of both the parties is known as contract.

Yes, Landon is obligated to perform the contract with Miriam.

The reason is that Landon prepared a separate contract with Miriam where Miriam does not know the principal reason for the contract between them. Therefore, if any default occurs within the contract then Landon is obligated to perform on behalf of Miriam for Isaiah.

To know more about contract, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/3965049

car insurance I'm sure ..

The answer is C, the forged deed is void.

A forged deed is a deed that is not signed by the owner, instead, someone else claiming himself as the real owner, signs the deed without the approval of the true owner to defraud him.

If the deed comes out to be forged or induced by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or duress the deed is said to be void. In such a case, since the deed is improperly delivered, there is no valid acceptance of the deed.

And since, one of the essentials of a valid contract is a valid acceptance, and in the present case there is no valid acceptance, hence the deed is void.

To know more about forged deeds: https://brainly.com/question/28145903

The most basic responsibility that comes with borrowing money from a bank is making all required payments on time. Option C

This means that the borrower must adhere to the agreed-upon repayment schedule and fulfill their financial obligations by making regular payments as outlined in the loan agreement.

When individuals borrow money from a bank, they enter into a financial agreement and are obligated to repay the borrowed amount according to the agreed-upon terms. Making all required payments on time is essential to fulfill this responsibility and maintain a good credit history.

Learn more about credit history at https://brainly.com/question/30191672

#SPJ1

The statement that best completes the diagram is option   A. Benjamin Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette introduces Enlightenment ideas to its readers.

The Pennsylvania Gazette, established by the esteemed Benjamin Franklin, was highly circulated throughout the colonies and effectively promoted the tenets of the Enlightenment, such as personal freedoms, reason, and inherent entitlements, to the general populace.

Therefore,  The colonial leaders were significantly influenced by Enlightenment principles, leading to their ratification of the Declaration of Independence during the Second Continental Congress.

Learn more about Enlightenment  from

https://brainly.com/question/1688832

#SPJ1

See text below

Question 1 of 10

Which statement best completes the diagram?

Diagram is:

The Second Continental Congressratifies the Declaration of Independence.

__

Enlightenment ideas are introduced in Europe.

Options

A. Benjamin Franklin's Pennsylvania Gazette introduces

Enlightenment ideas to its readers.

B. British military forces are told to withdraw from the colonies as

punishment for their disloyalty.

C. Colonial leaders reject the concept of natural rights because of its

association with Great Britain.

D. British leaders conclude that the only way to control the colonies.

is by enforcing a strict social contract

The correct answer is: "Miranda incriminated himself without knowing he could refuse to do so.

Have a good day.

The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.

For more questions on DC sniper crimes

https://brainly.com/question/30170344

#SPJ8

Answer:

I would want to say A . ..

Hoped this helped -

Sleepy~

Answer:

here

Explanation:

english II, American History I, health and PE B, LE Strategies for Online Learning Success B

Answer:False advertisment

Explanation:

There is no need to hire a attorney as long as your insurance provider agrees to cover the cost of all property damage and personal injuries.

This phrase first appeared in England, where attorneys at law was the term used to describe attorneys admitted to practice in common law courts. Depending on the type of law that was practiced, different terminology was used in the British legal system.

The appropriate responses are-

2. The issue can be addressed amicably; however, if you are detained and booked before the circumstances are understood, you might require legal representation.

3. The buyer in this scenario has two options: file a small claims lawsuit or seek aid from local consumer protection organizations. The issue may likely be resolved without a lawyer, and hiring one might be more expensive than buying the laptop.

4. The best advise for car buyers shouldn't come from an attorney.

5. Since you might be accused of a serious crime in this circumstance, you need to hire a lawyer immediately.

6. You could get in touch with your local human rights commission or the Equal Employment Commission before engaging an attorney. They could act as a mediator. If so, you might benefit from speaking with a lawyer who focuses on employment or discrimination issues.

7.  You must retain a wills-focused attorney.

8. You should speak with a lawyer if there are contested issues involving child support, custody, alimony, or property division.

9. Typically, you can file your taxes without a lawyer.

To learn more about attorney

https://brainly.com/question/10527103

#SPJ1

Investment generally can pay a better price of return than traditional banks. shares, bonds, and mutual price range.

Investment is the determination of an asset to acquire an increase in value over a period of time. investment calls for a sacrifice of a few gift assets, together with time, money, or an attempt. In finance, the purpose of making an investment is to generate a return from the invested asset.

Investment definition is an asset obtained or invested in to build wealth and store money from the tough earned income or appreciation. funding meaning is primarily to gain an additional source of earnings or gain benefit from the investment over a selected period of time. In an economic outlook, funding is the acquisition of products that are not consumed nowadays but are used within the destiny to generate wealth. In finance, funding is a monetary asset sold with the idea that the asset will provide profits further or will later be bought at a higher value charge for a profit.

A good investment is one that is well-proper to an investor's monetary aim has a suitable risk degree and will increase an investor's internet well worth. but, an investment this is appropriate for one investor may not be perfect for any other, so each individual must define their chance tolerance and funding desires.

Learn more about Investment here: https://brainly.com/question/25300925

#SPJ9

Answer:

Answer is A. Stocks, bonds, and mutual funds

Explanation:

A quarrel may be formulated by a landowner directing the dispute at the local government if they impose a zoning decree, namely if it restrains the use of his property.

For instance, when the district decides to use it exclusively for residential purposes, the owner may feel he is being shortchanged on its value and actual utilization.

Conversely, an affirmatory case from the "public benefit" viewpoint could maintain that such regulation is essential for maintaining the safety, health, and welfare of everyone in the area.

These rules seek to reconcile the rights of personal ownership with general communal benefit through organized and productive land use, countering overcrowding, and impeding any types of nuisance or potentially perilous pursuits.

Read more about property rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/9052855

#SPJ1

Answer: The answer is c.

Explanation:

The jurisdiction that belongs to police departments in the U.S. is territorial. They do not create laws. They do race profile, but that isn't the answer. Public safety seems to be the best choice. And finally, religous morals does not apply to them. Although we want the majority of our police to perform their ethical duties. The reality may be different depending where you are at.

The vast majority of all civil and criminal cases are filed in state courts. Sometimes a case can be filed under similar statutes in either state or federal court. There are 94 federal judicial districts. All but three of these districts have lifetime-appointed Article III judges.

Answer:NO

Explanation:

The correct answer is NO.

If Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together because civil law doesn't involve criminal matters and procedures in civil and criminal trials are very different.

There are lawsuits for different cases, if Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together.

What is civil action?

The civil action is a lawsuit for noncriminal actions that started with a complaint. this lawsuit usually involves private parties.

Since Anton's case is a criminal case, the case not be tried in a civil action because they don't involve criminal matters. Also, procedures in civil and criminal trials are different.

Therefore, If Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together.

Learn more on civil action here,

brainly.com/question/499624