Which of the following is true regarding section 1239?
A) It only applies to sales between unrelated taxpayers
B) It only applies to gains on sales of capital gain property
C) It only applies to gains on sales of depreciable property between related taxpayers
D) It only applies to sales of non-residential property.
E) None of the above
Answers
Option A is correct. section 1239 only applies to sales between unrelated taxpayers.
About Taxpayer
A taxpayer is a natural person, business, or other entity that must pay taxes. The government may provide identity or reference numbers to individuals or businesses as modern taxpayers.
One who pays the taxes is often referred to as a "taxpayer". A taxpayer is a person or a business that must pay taxes to local or federal taxing authorities. In addition to many other types, taxes can take the form of the income taxes or property taxes levied against owners of the real property (including such homes and automobiles). When people purchase taxable products and services, they may be required to pay taxes. The workforce of the nation is sometimes referred to as a "taxpayer" since taxes are used to fund government programmes and services.
To know more about Taxpayer:
brainly.com/question/29664276
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Which of these is an economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law?
A workers are guaranteed a certain income
B. Employers are encouraged to hire more workers
C. Employers are required to train more workers
D. Workers are allowed to organize into unions
Answers
Answer: B
Explanation:
The economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law can be summarized, as workers being guaranteed a certain income. Hence, Option (A) is correct.
This means that employers must pay their employees at least the minimum wage, providing workers with a baseline level of compensation.
By ensuring that workers receive a certain income, the minimum wage law helps to protect them from extremely low wages and potential exploitation.
It establishes a basic standard of living and provides economic security for workers, particularly those in low-wage jobs.
Thus, this economic benefit aims to improve workers' financial well-being and reduce poverty rates by setting a floor on wages in the labor market.
Learn more about minimum wage law here:
https://brainly.com/question/31859230
#SPJ2
this amendment guarantees civil rights that are not explained in the constitution. What is it?
Answers
The amendment that guarantees civil rights that are not explained in the Constitution is the 9th Amendment.
This amendment was added to the Bill of Rights in 1791 and states, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Essentially, this means that just because a right is not explicitly listed in the Constitution, it does not mean that it does not exist or cannot be protected.
The 9th Amendment has been used in many cases to protect individual liberties and rights that are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, such as the right to privacy and the right to marry. It has also been used to support civil rights movements, such as the fight for LGBTQ+ rights and reproductive rights.
Overall, the 9th Amendment is an important safeguard for individual liberties and civil rights, ensuring that the government cannot deny or disparage rights that are not explicitly listed in the Constitution.
To learn more about the 9th Amendment, visit: https://brainly.com/question/2857365
#SPJ11
calista is an enthusiastic gun owner and a supporter of extensive gun ownership rights. yet, she is not a member of the national rifle association or any other interest groups that lobbies for the rights of gun owners. calista is the efforts of the national rifle association as well as other pro-gun interest groups and their members.
Answers
Indeed, calista is an enthusiastic gun owner and a supporter of extensive gun ownership rights. yet, she is not a member of the national rifle association or any other interest groups that lobbies for the rights of gun owners.
Calista is free riding on the efforts of the national rifle association as well as other pro-gun interest groups and their members.
About National rifle association
The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) is a U.S.-based organisation that promotes gun rights. The contemporary NRA, which was originally founded in 1871 to enhance rifle marksmanship, is a well-known gun rights advocacy group that still promotes firearm competence and safety. Additionally, the company produces a number of periodicals and supports professional shooting competitions. The NRA claims that as of December 2018, it has approximately 5 million members, however this number has not been officially verified. One of the most powerful advocacy organisations in American politics is the NRA.
To know more about National rifle association:
brainly.com/question/14211008
#SPJ4
The assertion that non-formal institutions have no role to play at the processing stage is an empty rhetoric. comment
Answers
The assertion that non-formal institutions have no role in the processing stage is false. Non-formal institutions contribute valuable insights, local knowledge, and innovative approaches, enhancing decision-making processes and ensuring inclusivity.
There is no evidence to support the claim that non-formal institutions play no part in the processing stage. In order to address particular issues and support the work of formal institutions, non formal institutions like community based organizations and grassroots movements are essential. They can offer priceless insights and cutting edge strategies because they have access to local information, expertise and connections with the affected communities.
By obtaining firsthand information and involving a range of stakeholders, non-formal institutions can make sure that the decision making process is more inclusive and representative. They also fill the gaps created by formal institutions by mobilizing resources and offering assistance to people and communities.
It is detrimental to the diversity of solutions and impediments legitimate and effective decision making to ignore the role of non-formal institutions. A more thorough and long lasting solution may result from accepting their contributions.
To know more about non-formal institutions here
brainly.com/question/24271869
#SPJ4
A. In your opinion, did the justice and correctional system fail Paula Cooper (this should include from the time she was a child until her adulthood)? If yes, detail what should have been done to maybe have a different outcome in Miss Cooper's life. If no, (you do not think the systems failed her) detail what both systems did for Miss Cooper as she moved through them (child to adult). This should be a minimum of 10 sentences to get full credit.
B. What did you think about this case?
Answers
A. The justice and correctional system failed Paula Cooper in many ways. Paula Cooper had a difficult childhood, and she was already a victim of neglect and abuse before committing a heinous crime at the age of 15. She was sentenced to death, which was later commuted to 60 years in prison.
However, she should have received help and support to address the underlying causes of her behavior, such as mental health issues and childhood trauma. Instead, she was put in an adult prison where she faced violence, abuse, and poor living conditions.
The correctional system did not provide her with the necessary rehabilitation, education, and therapy to prepare her for re-entry into society. If the justice and correctional system had treated Paula Cooper's underlying issues instead of punishing her, there could have been a different outcome in her life. She could have had the chance to lead a productive life and avoid the mistakes of her past.
B. This case is a tragic example of how the justice system can fail individuals, particularly those who have experienced childhood trauma and mental health issues. It highlights the need for a more holistic approach to the criminal justice system, one that emphasizes rehabilitation and support instead of punishment.
It is important to recognize the root causes of criminal behavior and address them rather than simply punishing the offender. The case also underscores the racial and economic disparities that exist within the criminal justice system, where individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds are more likely to be incarcerated and receive harsher sentences. Overall, this case should serve as a reminder of the flaws in the justice system and the need for reform.
To know more about heinous crime here:
https://brainly.com/question/2455972
#SPJ1
Benefits of the european and liberian from the transatlantic trade.
Answers
The European and Liberian societies greatly benefited from the transatlantic trade in various ways. Europeans experienced economic growth due to increased access to resources, labor, and new markets. The transatlantic trade provided them with raw materials such as sugar, cotton, and tobacco, which were essential for their growing industries. Additionally, European countries expanded their colonial empires, gaining control over territories and populations, which increased their global influence.
The slave trade was another aspect of the transatlantic trade that immensely benefited European countries, as it supplied them with a cheap and abundant labor force. Liberians, on the other hand, benefited from the transatlantic trade through the introduction of new crops, technologies, and cultural exchanges. Europeans brought crops like cassava, maize, and plantains, which became staples in the Liberian diet. The new technologies introduced by Europeans, such as metallurgy and textile production, significantly improved local industries. The cultural exchanges resulting from the transatlantic trade led to the blending of African and European traditions, creating unique art, music, and languages. Both European and Liberian societies experienced significant benefits from the transatlantic trade, such as economic growth, access to new resources and markets, improved industries, and rich cultural exchanges.
to know about transatlantic trade visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14260809
#SPJ11
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Answers
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
is contract law substantive law or procedural law? how about a rule specifying that a defendant has 30 days to respond to a complaint?
Answers
Contract law is a substantive law because substantive law defines and determines rights and obligations of the citizens. In view of Order VIII Rule 1 of the CPC, the defendant's entitlement to file a written statement within of 30 days following the serving of summons is undeniable.
Substantive laws are the set of statutory rules legislated by the government for the citizens, these law set forth punishment and also defines the rights and responsibilities of the citizens.
However, procedural law states how a mechanics of legal case flows at the different levels, it adheres the due process. some of the example of Substantive laws are Transfer of property act, contract act, tort etc. According to the rules of court of United States the defendant shall serve an answer within 30 days after being served with the summons and after service of initial complaint.
The Substantive Law would be a Statutory statute which outlines and regulates the citizen's legal rights and obligations. Procedural Law, sometimes known as Adjective Law, is concerned with the application of law that is governed and regulated by practice, procedure, and machinery.
To know more about "Contract law" visit-
brainly.com/question/14316157
#SPJ4
are verbal contracts valid? a. no. unless they are discharged through performance. b. yes. all verbal contracts are valid. c. no. all verbal contracts are void. d. yes. unless they violate the statute of frauds.
Answers
Yes, verbal contracts valid. Unless they violate the statute of frauds. Option D is the correct answer.
Legally speaking, verbal agreements can frequently be just as binding as written ones. Although they could be very challenging to regulate, you should take solace in the knowledge that there are relevant state and federal laws that can support the enforcement of such contracts and safeguard your legal rights. Even so, placing your agreement in paper is still the best approach to ensure that all parties are protected. Option D is the correct answer.
A sort of agreement involving two or more parties that is established orally rather than through a written document is known as a verbal contract. Regardless of whether an oral agreement comprises all of the components of a contract or not, there are situations when a physical written contract is required in order for the agreement to be enforceable. Option D is the correct answer.
Learn more about Contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ4
Summarize the trial courts reason for ruling the Donald Myers was not insane at the time of the crime
Answers
In the case of Donald Myers, the trial court ruled that he was not insane at the time of the crime. The court reached this decision after reviewing the evidence and testimony presented during the trial.
In particular, the court noted that Myers had a history of mental illness and had previously been hospitalized for his condition. However, the court found that this did not necessarily mean that he was insane at the time of the crime. Instead, the court focused on the evidence regarding Myers' behavior leading up to and during the crime.
This evidence included testimony from witnesses who saw Myers behaving normally in the days and hours before the crime, as well as evidence that he had planned and carried out the crime in a deliberate and purposeful manner. Based on this evidence, the court concluded that Myers was not suffering from a mental illness that rendered him incapable of understanding the nature and consequences of his actions.
To know more about necessarily visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32679605
#SPJ11
Shakila’s husband, David, had vomited after having dinner at a local restaurant. Shakila then brought him to Hospital Suredie for treatment. It was 1.00 a.m. in the morning and there was no doctor on duty. The assistant nurse on duty had called Dr. Quack Nicholson, who was the doctor in charge, for instructions. Dr. Quack instructed the nurse to tell the patient to go home and consult his own personal physician in the morning. Shakila’s husband died later the next day. The cause of death was diagnosed as a chronic disease and he would have died anyway, even if Dr. Quack had treated him.
Advise Shakila whether she can successfully sue Hospital Suredie and Dr Quack for negligence.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
It is difficult to say whether Shakila can successfully sue Hospital Suredie and Dr. Quack for negligence without more information about the specific circumstances of the case and the laws in the jurisdiction in which the incident occurred.
In general, for a negligence case to be successful, it must be proven that the defendants had a duty of care to the patient, that this duty of care was breached, and that this breach caused harm to the patient.
In this case, it could be argued that the hospital and Dr. Quack had a duty of care to David as a patient seeking medical treatment. However, it is also stated that there was no doctor on duty and the cause of death was diagnosed as a chronic disease and he would have died anyway, even if Dr. Quack had treated him. This information suggests that the death may not have been preventable and that there may not have been a breach of the duty of care.
It would be advisable for Shakila to consult with a lawyer experienced in medical malpractice cases to determine the specific laws and regulations that may apply in her case and to evaluate the strength of her potential legal claim.
How many Special Agent Entry Programs does the FBI have for applicants?
Answers
How many Special Agent Entry Programs does the FBI have for applicants? Well the F.B.I has 18 applicant
what are common work contexts for Farmworkers and Laborers, Crop? Check all that apply.
outdoors, exposed to weather
exposed to disease or infections
spend time using hands to handle objects, tools, or controls
spend time climbing ladders, scaffolds, or poles
exposed to contaminants
Answers
Answer: Duties may include tilling soil and applying fertilizers; transplanting, weeding, thinning, or pruning crops; applying pesticides; or cleaning, grading, sorting, packing, and loading harvested products. May construct trellises, repair fences and farm buildings, or participate in irrigation activities.
Job Zone Examples: These occupations involve ...
Education: Some of these occupations may re...
Explanation:
Answer:
A, C, E
1, 3, 5
Explanation:
this won't help you author of this question, but it will people using edge in 2022
Good films.
What are good films on what goes around comes around karma?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Films that tell stories present a narrative that can be fictional or not, but whose central purpose is to engage and entertain the viewer, as in the film "Karma: What goes around, comes around.
What is the plot of the film?
This Korean film specifically was released in 2020, being the horror genre and tells the story of a teacher who finds her deceased father's diary, in the house where she lived in her childhood, and from there discovers secrets and mysteries involving such deaths. .
Therefore, cinematographic works aim to lead to emotion, reflection, personal expression, engagement and entertainment, being the analysis of what a good film is to be personal and based on the perspective of the spectator.
Can it be said that: "Every act that causes damage to the legitimate interests of individuals and organizations in society is a violation of the law"? For example.
Answers
No
Explanation:
Depends on what you believe, more or less. In places where freedom of speech is allowed, then no, it's not a crime because you can say whatever you want. However, just because you can do something doesn't make it right. Not a lot of people seem to understand that.
Help me this question
Answers
Answer: I think it's d
Explanation:
How much is the penalty for pedestrians under 17 who violate the pedestrian law?.
Answers
The penalty for pedestrians under 17 who violate the pedestrian laws is a $22 fine.
Pedestrian comes from the Latin for "foot" and nevertheless refers to individuals who stroll or journey with the aid of using their foot. In its early utilization, it becomes contrasted with equestrian, which refers to the ones journeying with the aid of using horses. Perhaps due to the fact taking walks is much less thrilling than riding, sooner or later pedestrians additionally have become a synonym for or unimaginative. Pedestrian is additionally a poor time period for something taken into consideration mediocre, uninspired, or missing in originality.
It's specifically utilized in creative criticism, together with opinions of music, movies, fashion, or food. Calling something pedestrian is normally taken into consideration as an. The definition of a pedestrian is someone who's taking walks alongside an avenue or a few evolved locations to get to where he wishes to go.
Learn more about pedestrians here
https://brainly.com/question/24872445
#SPJ4
a) Los niños
Y у
las ninas no raconan.
¿Que efectos tiene esta idea en los
niños y las niñois ?
Answers
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Los efectos que tiene esta idea en los niños y las niñas es la siguiente.
Se dice que los niños y las niñas no razonan. Y lo que sucede es que en esta etapa de la infancia el niño se desenvuelve por sus impulsos e imita lo que ve en los adultos.
Los expertos sociólogos comentan que hasta los 9 o 10 años de edad, los infantes no son capaces de razonar lo que hacen, y sólo se dejan llevar por sus impulsos. Por ello, no pueden sopesar las consecuencias de sus actos. Por esos son niños.
A esa edad, les gusta correr, jugar, no distinguen entre sus acciones y se limitan a observar y repetir conductas que observan de sus padres en casa. Como dicen los expertos. A esa edad, los niños son como unas "esponjas y lo absorben todo." Por eso hay que tener cuidado con lo que se les enseña.
The rationale behind why the glass-steagall act mandated the ban on commercial banks from dealing in securities markets and selling insurance was that such activities:_____________
Answers
The rationale behind why the Glass-Steagall Act mandated the ban on commercial banks from dealing in securities markets and selling insurance was that such activities: were believed to have contributed to the financial instability and market failures that led to the Great Depression in the 1930s.
The Glass-Steagall Act aimed to reduce the risks associated with commercial banks engaging in speculative activities by separating commercial banking (i.e., taking deposits and making loans) from investment banking (i.e., underwriting and trading securities) and insurance activities.
This separation was intended to protect depositors' funds from being used for risky investments and to minimize the potential for conflicts of interest between banks and their customers.
By enforcing this separation, the Act sought to restore confidence in the banking system and promote financial stability. It was believed that limiting the scope of commercial banks' activities would reduce the likelihood of bank failures and systemic financial crises, ultimately leading to a more stable and secure financial system.
In summary, the Glass-Steagall Act mandated the ban on commercial banks from dealing in securities markets and selling insurance to minimize risks associated with speculative activities, reduce conflicts of interest, and promote financial stability.
This was in response to the financial instability and market failures that occurred during the Great Depression.
To know more about Glass-Steagall Act, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14054317#
#SPJ11
a demand for the relief sought." upon receiving the complaint, the driver objected that the pedestrian’s request for punitive damages was made without the court’s permission and thus must be stricken from the complaint based on the state a statute. must the federal court adhere to the state a rule and require the pedestrian to obtain its permission to seek punitive damages?"
Answers
The federal court may not necessarily adhere to the state rule and require the pedestrian to obtain permission to seek punitive damages. It depends on whether the state rule conflicts with federal law or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The answer to whether the federal court must adhere to the state rule and require the pedestrian to obtain permission to seek punitive damages depends on the specific jurisdiction and applicable laws. Generally, in federal court, the rules and procedures of the federal system govern the case. However, state law may still be considered if it does not conflict with federal law or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In this scenario, if the state rule requiring permission to seek punitive damages conflicts with the federal rules, the federal court may not require the pedestrian to obtain permission. The court will likely apply the federal rules and procedures for determining whether punitive damages are warranted.
It is important to consult legal experts and review the specific jurisdiction's laws, rules, and precedents to determine how the federal court would handle this situation. The interaction between state and federal law can be complex, and it is essential to understand the relevant legal framework to determine the appropriate course of action.
Learn more about federal law
https://brainly.com/question/30040989
#SPJ11
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answers
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
Question 1
0 / 0.5 pts
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is generally
covered by a state's "open records" law and all of the
documentation from ADR proceedings are therefore
public records.
True
False
Answers
Congratulations! You were just informed that you are the new Police Chief in a rather large city where an officer-involved shooting occurred less than one year ago. Your officer shot and killed an unarmed man, but the officer was acquitted of all charges in the shooting. Since the verdict was announced, there has been an uptick in crime in your city. You were made aware of the incident before you were hired, and you were told that the Department is now engaging in “de-policing” - departing from proactive policing – because of the anti-cop hostility in the community. Before you even had a chance to put your coffee mug on your new desk, your administrative assistant runs into your office yelling, “they’re here!” You find out that a protest march is underway with numerous reporters working their way through the melee. Your community has lost trust in your Police Department and the courts, and they are demanding that you do something. Community leaders make their way into your office. You pause a moment - and then say, “Good to see you. You saved me a phone call. Come, let’s sit down and discuss what we can do to help our community.”
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
1. As a leader of police officer, you have many years of policing under your belt, so with that role in mind you can establish new rules and regulations for your officers as the chief.
2. As someone who is new to the community, listening to the thoughts of the community leader will be essential to helping reduce crime and protests.
3. Gathering of evidence of the case of the police officer killing the unarmed man can 1. help determine if there really was a case of self defense or not 2. familiarizing yourself to the case more on evidence and less of word of mouth and 3. reappealing the verdict to manslaughter.
4. Establish a compromise with the community leader to address "de-policing" as unproductive counter to the rising crime rates.
5. Establish new regulations for the community leaders so no similar reoccurring incidents may repeat themselves in such turmoil.
Double jeopardy is
A putting someone on trial for the same crime in a different state.
B the right of the government to take private property and use it for public use.
C putting someone on trial again for a crime of which he or she was acquitted.
D to formally accuse a person of a crime.
Answers
C. Putting someone on trial again for a crime of which he or she was acquitted.
What is crime?Crime is the violation of a law or laws that results in punishment for the offender. It is a broad concept that encompasses a wide range of activities, from minor infractions such as traffic violations to serious offenses such as ra pe or murder. Crime is a social construct that is defined by the laws of a particular jurisdiction. It is an intentional act or omission in violation of criminal law and punishable by the state or other legal authority. Crimes can range from misdemeanors to felonies and carry a variety of punishments.
Double jeopardy is a legal concept that prevents a person from being tried for the same crime twice, after being acquitted or convicted. This is enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution.
To learn more about crime
https://brainly.com/question/14933777
#SPJ1
reading questions for just mercy chapters 9-12 ch 9. im here 1. does it seem like the judge now believes ralph myers? 2. what are your impressions of mrs. williams? 3. stevenson remarks on several physical actions he takes during the trial. what are they they effective? 4. of all the evidence presented in this trial, which is the most likely to sway the judge's ru which is the least likely? 5. should stevenson and o'conner be concerned?
Answers
It is unclear whether the judge now believes Ralph Myers or not. The judge seems to be questioning the credibility of both Myers and Walter McMillian's defense team. Mrs. Williams is portrayed as a resilient and strong woman who is determined to fight for her son's freedom. She is also shown to be a caring and supportive mother.
Stevenson takes several physical actions during the trial, such as making eye contact with the jury and speaking directly to them, using body language to emphasize certain points, and standing close to the judge during arguments. These actions are effective in conveying his message and engaging the audience.The most likely evidence to sway the judge's ruling would be the eyewitness testimony of Myers, even though it is known to be unreliable. The least likely evidence to sway the judge's ruling would be the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution.
Stevenson and O'Connor should be concerned about the outcome of the trial, but they remain determined to fight for McMillian's freedom and seek justice. They are aware of the challenges they face, but they continue to work hard and use every possible means to prove McMillian's innocence.happy to help you with your questions about Just Mercy chapters 9-12. In Chapter 9, it does not seem like the judge fully believes Ralph Myers, as there is no clear indication of his complete trust in Myers' testimony. However, the judge appears to be somewhat open to considering the evidence presented. My impressions of Mrs. Williams are that she is a caring and compassionate individual, showing concern for Walter McMillian's situation and his family's well-being.
To know more about freedom Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7723076
#SPJ11
Which of the following is the standard of proof necessary for issuing a search warrant?
a. Preponderance of the evidence
b. Probable cause
c. Beyond a reasonable doubt
d. Clear and convincing evidence.
Answers
The standard of proof necessary for issuing a search warrant is "Probable cause."
What is a search warrant?
A search warrant is an authorization from a judge or magistrate that allows law enforcement officers to conduct a search of an individual, their home, vehicle, or other possessions. To obtain a search warrant, the law enforcement agency must show probable cause that a crime has been committed, and the evidence sought is relevant to that crime.
In criminal law, the standard of proof is the degree of evidence required to prove the facts in issue. Different standards of proof are used in different situations. "Probable cause" is the standard of proof necessary for issuing a search warrant.
Learn more about a search warrant:
https://brainly.com/question/26392802
#SPJ11
Can words or terms in contracts that are subject to more than one reasonable interpretation lead to mistakes?
Answers
Yes, words or terms in contracts that are subject to more than one reasonable interpretation can lead to mistakes.
When a contract is ambiguous or unclear, it may result in one or both parties misunderstanding the terms of the agreement. This can lead to disputes or litigation down the line, which can be costly and time-consuming for all involved. It is important for contracts to be written in clear and unambiguous language to avoid any misunderstandings or mistakes.
Words or terms in contracts that are subject to more than one reasonable interpretation can indeed lead to mistakes. This is because when a contract contains ambiguous language or vague terms, it can be difficult for the parties involved to fully understand their rights and obligations under the agreement. This can lead to misunderstandings, disputes, and even litigation.
Learn more about interpretation here:
https://brainly.com/question/30932003
#SPJ11
Three different way of cultural learning
Answers
Cultural learning may be accomplished in three ways:
Imitative learningInstructed learningCollaborative learningWhat is Cultural learning?Cultural learning is the process through which a group of people or animals within a civilization or culture learn and transmit knowledge. Learning styles are heavily impacted by how society interacts with its children and youth. In the last fifty years, a cross-cultural study has mostly concentrated on contrasts between Eastern and Western civilizations. Individuals can gain talents that they would not be able to master on their own during the course of their lives through cultural learning. Cultural learning is thought to be especially essential for humans. When compared to the appearance of adult teeth, humans are weaned at a young age.
To learn more about Cultural learning, click
https://brainly.com/question/29024017
#SPJ1
Smalltown, Alabama is incorporated by the government. Smalltown is
a. a foreign corporation.
b. a public corporation.
c. a private corporation.
d. an alien corporation
Answers
Smalltown, Alabama being incorporated by the government makes it b) a public corporation.
A public corporation is a corporation that is created by the government to perform a specific function, such as providing a public service. Unlike private corporations, public corporations are owned by the government and are accountable to the public.
Smalltown, Alabama being a public corporation means that it is a government entity, responsible for providing public services to the community. This could include services such as water and sewer, garbage collection, and public safety services such as police and fire protection.
As a public corporation, Smalltown, Alabama is subject to different laws and regulations than private corporations. It is also subject to greater public scrutiny, as its operations and activities are funded by taxpayers.
In conclusion, Smalltown, Alabama being incorporated by the government makes it a public corporation, responsible for providing essential public services to the community.
To learn more about public corporations: https://brainly.com/question/30512284
#SPJ11
Why does the government require qualified 18-year-old males to register for selective service?
Answers
Answer:
c
Explanation: