The false statement about the tax deficiency appeals process is that all litigation of tax cases must begin in the U.S. Tax Court.
All litigation of tax cases must begin in the U.S. Tax Court is the false statement about the tax deficiency appeals process. If taxpayers disagree with the deficiency determination made by the IRS, they may take the case to court, where the disagreement will be resolved. In contrast, taxpayers have a variety of choices in terms of where they can seek relief from deficiency determinations. The most popular choices are the United States Tax Court and the United States District Courts. Taxpayers may also file an administrative appeal with the IRS's Appeals Office, which is independent of the IRS division that made the deficiency decision. If all administrative alternatives have been exhausted and the taxpayer is still dissatisfied, the taxpayer may file a complaint in the United States District Court or the United States Court of Federal Claims, depending on the amount in dispute. Therefore, the correct option is (c) All litigation of tax cases must begin in the U.S. Tax Court.Mrs. Clyde would be relieved of liability for the underpayment under the innocent spouse rule in the case where Mr. Clyde was the sole income earner during the entire marriage. Innocent spouse relief is a tax provision that allows spouses who file a joint tax return to request relief from joint and several liability for income tax, penalty, and interest caused by their spouse's erroneous item, provided that they meet specific requirements. The erroneous item could be understated income, improperly claimed deductions, or other inappropriate tax credits. Therefore, the correct option is (c) Mr. Clyde was the sole income earner during the entire marriage.
To know more about litigation visit:
brainly.com/question/15284945
#SPJ11
What cases were important to freedom of speech?
Answer:
The U.S. Supreme Court has decided several cases involving the First Amendment rights of public school students, but the most often cited are Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986) and Hazelwood School District v.
The following are inmate rights that are protected by the U.S. Constitution except,
A.the right to be free from racial segregation
B.the right to privacy
C.the right to a hearing if they are to be moved to a mental health facility
D.the right to humane conditions and facilities
The following are inmate rights that are protected by the U.S. Constitution except, B. the right to privacy.
What are the rights of inmates under the U.S. Constitution?While it is important to note that inmates automatically lose their constitutional rights, the Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment of inmates.
Other rights guaranteed for inmates include the rights to:
Humane facilities and conditionsBe free from sexual crimesBe free from racial segregationExpress condition complaintsAppropriate mental health careMedical care and attention as neededAssert their rights under the Americans with Disabilities ActA hearing if they are to be moved to a mental health facility.Thus, the following are inmate rights that are protected by the U.S. Constitution except, B. the right to privacy.
Learn more about the rights of inmates at https://brainly.com/question/15112256
What is anti-Semitism? Is it still prevalent today?
Explain.
What can law enforcement do to help combat it? Discuss the
prevalence of violent
Answer:
Anti-Semitism is prejudice, hatred, or discrimination against Jewish people. It is still prevalent today, and it can take many forms, such as verbal abuse, vandalism, or violence. Law enforcement can help combat it by enforcing hate crime laws and investigating incidents of anti-Semitic behavior. The prevalence of violent anti-Semitic incidents varies by location but it is a serious issue that must be addressed.
ပရဟိတဆိုတာဘာလဲ ရည်ရွယ်ချက်ဖော်ပြပါ
Answer:
what do you want ?
Explanation:
Read the article attached.
1. What did you think about the article- for example- was it informative, too much information, not enough information? Explain your answer.
2. List five key pieces of information that you learned from the article and explain each one based on your understanding of what you read.
3. It is important to be able to discuss child abuse in a way that is productive because child abuse tends to bring out a lot of emotions. Many people have different opinions of what discipline/child abuse is unless there are visible injuries to a child. We have to remember as investigators that we are seeking facts. It is up to the courts to determine the punishment (if any) of the offender- and that is based on the facts (not conjecture) of the investigation. The purpose of the following question is to note the different opinions people have concerning discipline vs abuse. Keep in mind that this is opinion based- not everyone is going to think the same way, and we are required to be respectful of other people's opinion. In your opinion (this is not based on personal experiences or law, merely an opinion), at what point does discipline become abuse?
The article informs and guides investigating possible child abuse or homicide.
Five key pieces of information from the article are:
Collecting information about the acute injuryInterviews with medical personnelReviewing medical recordsThorough scene investigation.Interviews with various individualsWhat is crime investigation?
In terms of collecting information about the injury, this info is a starting point for the investigation. Interview medical personnel who treated child. Their expertise can provide valuable insights into injuries.
Discipline turns into abuse by intentionally harming the child. It harms children by causing pain, trauma, or violating their rights. Abuse is excessive force, cruelty, or neglect that ignores the child's welfare and safety. Investigators must collect evidence to assess if disciplinary actions have turned abusive, leaving the courts to decide on next steps.
Learn more about crime investigation from
https://brainly.com/question/28320262
#SPJ1
Why would intellectual property theft fit the mission of private technology security and possibly be more applicable than it is to law enforcement?
Law enforcement does not tend to get involved in white collar crime.
Answer:
Because intellectual property theft is a non-violent crime, usually corporate and for financial reasons.
Explanation:
Law enforcement is aimed at solving violent crimes, of large proportions that promote physical damage and well expressed. Theft of intellectual property does not fit this type of crime, since it is a non-violent crime, of a corporate nature and that causes financial damage, but does not promote physical and widespread harm. In this case, this type of crime is best addressed by the private security and technology mission.
How does the uniform commercial code differ from the common law of contracts?
Answer: Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment. UCC governs contractual transaction with goods and tangible objects (such as a purchase of a car).
Explanation:
Answer:
Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment.
Explanation:
which rule of the federal rules of civil procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports? rule 26 rule 24 rule 25 rule 27
The rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that requires expert witnesses to submit written reports is Rule 26.
Under Rule 26(a)(2)(B), a party must disclose the identity of any expert witness it may use at trial and must provide a written report that includes the expert's opinions, the basis and reasons for those opinions, and other information about the expert and the testimony that they may provide. rule of the federal rules of civil procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports? rule 26 rule 24 rule 25 rule 27 .This requirement aims to ensure that the parties have sufficient information about the expert witness's opinions and methodology before trial, which can facilitate more informed and efficient litigation.
Learn more about reports here:
https://brainly.com/question/14969693
#SPJ11
Due to the rising cost of water, Congress enacted a statute that allocated $20 million to fund a consortium of independent non-profit water organizations. The purpose of the consortium was to address the various issues causing a rise in the cost of water and water shortages across the United States, and to fund research into solutions. The statute provided clear guidelines about what the consortium should research and what it could spend, and specified that the remaining funds would be allocated for infrastructure improvements. In addition, the statute delegated to the Department of the Interior the power to select the water organizations to participate in the consortium.
Is the statute constitutional?
No, because Congress is delegating its authority to the executive branch of the government.
No, because the statute exceeds the scope of Congress's investigative power.
Yes, because Congress has the power to enact this legislation under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Yes, because Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare of the public.
Option 1 is Correct. Because Congress has given the executive arm of the government authority, the statute is not constitutional.
A law passed by Congress that included $20 million was intended to fund a coalition of independent, non-profit water organizations in response to the rising cost of water. The consortium's goal was to solve the myriad problems that were driving up water prices and creating shortages all throughout the country while also funding research into potential remedies.
The act indicated that the consortium's leftover assets would be used for infrastructure upgrades, and it provided specific criteria for the kind of research it should conduct and the amount of money it may spend. In addition, the act gave the Secretary of the Interior the authority to choose which water groups would be included in the consortium.
Learn more about constitutional Visit: brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Due to the rising cost of water, Congress enacted a statute that allocated $20 million to fund a consortium of independent non-profit water organizations. The purpose of the consortium was to address the various issues causing a rise in the cost of water and water shortages across the United States, and to fund research into solutions. The statute provided clear guidelines about what the consortium should research and what it could spend, and specified that the remaining funds would be allocated for infrastructure improvements. In addition, the statute delegated to the Department of the Interior the power to select the water organizations to participate in the consortium.
Is the statute constitutional?
1. No, because Congress is delegating its authority to the executive branch of the government.
2. No, because the statute exceeds the scope of Congress's investigative power.
3. Yes, because Congress has the power to enact this legislation under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
4. Yes, because Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare of the public.
In the early 1900s, Dr. Hamilton Wright, the father of American narcotics laws, decided the US could gain favored trading status with China by leading international efforts to
1) decrease the regulation of heroin
2) double morphine production
3) reduce opium importation
4) step up the manufacture of cocaine
In the early 1900s, Dr. Hamilton Wright, the father of American narcotics laws, decided the US could gain favored trading status with China by leading international efforts to step up the manufacture of drugs. Therefore, the option 4 holds true.
The narcotics laws of the United States were directly in association of gaining the trade benefits for the American society by gaining favors with the Chinese trade links. These international efforts were undertaken during the early 20th century, in order to step up the manufacturing of drugs.
Learn more about narcotics here:
https://brainly.com/question/6375028
#SPJ4
A set of statutes that apply to those serving in the armed forces of the United States.
Answer:
Unless specifically approved by the Constitution or an act of Congress, the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the willful use of any portion of the Army or Air Force to carry out the statute.
Can a private citizen be impeached?
2. In a multicultural society as South Africa misunderstandings are bound to happen. Provide us with an example where you had an encounter with someone from a different culture, race or language group where there was a misunderstanding experienced when greeting or communicating? Elaborate. (10)
why do some communities struggle with water?
Answer: Since 2013, thousands of Californians in the Central Valley are unable to drink water from domestic wells and municipal systems because they are contaminated with nitrates and bacteria from farm and dairy runoff, as well as arsenic, uranium and other harmful industrial chemicals, researchers found.
the combination of vegetal and figural forms in the basin (baptistère de st. louis) reflects the islamic connection between
The combination of vegetal and figural forms in the basin (baptist ère de st. louis) reflects the Islamic connection between nature and art.
The basin is a representation of the Islamic tradition of combining plant and figural patterns, which was used to depict Islamic religious and cultural practices.What is Baptist ere de Saint Louis?Baptist ere de Saint Louis is a large marble basin inlaid with Champlain enamel. It was made in the 14th century in Syria or Egypt. The large basin is now kept in the Louvre Museum. The baptistery has scenes of knightly combats and hunting along with emblems of the royal French crown and blue fleurs-de-lis, as well as Islamic inscriptions.The Islamic connection between nature and art The combination of vegetal and figural forms in the basin (baptist ère de st. louis) reflects the Islamic connection between nature and art.
It is a reflection of the Islamic tradition of using plant patterns to represent religious and cultural practices. Islamic art reflects the ideals and philosophies of Islamic culture. Islamic art uses a variety of techniques and materials to create art that is both beautiful and meaningful.The use of plant patterns in Islamic art The use of plant patterns in Islamic art is called arabesque. Arabesque is a form of Islamic ornamentation that uses plant forms such as leaves, vines, and flowers in complex patterns. Arabesque designs are often used in Islamic architecture, textiles, ceramics, and metalwork. Arabesque designs are highly stylized and often incorporate calligraphy as well. Islamic art is known for its intricate patterns, rich colors, and beautiful designs.
to know more about nature visit
https://brainly.com/question/33632269
#SPJ11
a representative who is elected by all voters of the state is called :
Answer:
At-large
Explanation:
The State Administrator is permitted to do all of the following EXCEPT: A withhold registration of a security B arrest an individual for violating State law C request that the state Attorney General file criminal charges against an individual for willfully violating State law
Answer:
Explanation:
The State Administrator is permitted to do all of the following EXCEPT: A withhold registration of a security B arrest an individual for violating State law C request that the state Attorney General file criminal charges against an individual for willfully violating State law
Advocate for or against allowing a cause of action for wrongful
birth (you can advocate either way, but you will learn more if you
defend the position you instinctively disagree
with).
Wrongful birth refers to a scenario whereby medical professionals do not adequately advise a parent about potential abnormalities in their unborn child during prenatal testing.
The parent may have decided against having the baby if they had known of the issues beforehand. Such parents can sue the healthcare provider for wrongful birth. There is no one right answer to whether a cause of action should be allowed in a wrongful birth. However, let's advocate against it.
It is not ethical to allow for wrongful birth lawsuits. Firstly, the responsibility of such lawsuits falls squarely on medical professionals. Medical professionals already carry an immense burden of dealing with human life. Doctors should not have to carry additional weight in cases where the issue was not caused by the medical personnel. As a result, wrongful birth cases may be detrimental to medical professionals' careers. Doctors may stop taking on high-risk cases to avoid potential litigation, resulting in the loss of innocent lives.Secondly, wrongful birth cases are a blatant disregard of human life. The child is a living and breathing individual that should not be subject to lawsuits. A child is a gift and a blessing regardless of their physical or mental condition. The laws surrounding wrongful birth should not devalue human life.Finally, wrongful birth lawsuits promote eugenics, which is a practice of selectively choosing traits in offspring. If wrongful birth lawsuits were to be allowed, it would lead to the promotion of aborting children with any perceived abnormality. It is ethically wrong to promote selective abortion based on perceived genetic defects.
In conclusion, wrongful birth lawsuits are not ethical. They promote selective abortions and disregard human life. Medical professionals are already under a great burden, and wrongful birth lawsuits would increase their workload and cause them unnecessary stress. A child's life is precious, and their physical or mental conditions do not determine their worth. Therefore, a cause of action for wrongful birth should not be allowed.
To know more about ethical visit:
brainly.com/question/30590798
#SPJ11
Attic Dwellers Sometimes, animals like rats, mice, and squirrels will climb into an attic. They like to chew on things. It is not good if they decide to chew on electrical wires. If they do, this can cause a fire. So, it is important to make it hard for these animals to get under your roof. Some people try to get rid of these unwanted house guests by putting out mouse traps in the attic. Others might call an exterminator. This is a person who comes to someone's house to get rid of these animals. 2 An exterminator is a person who goes to someone's house to get rid of rats and mice. Why would someone want to call an exterminator to go into the attic? A. to tell the rats and mice to leave the attic B. to feed the rats and mice in the attic C. to keep the house from catching on fire D. to cut the electrical wires in the house
Answer:
C. to keep the house from catching on fire
Explanation:
Rats pose a problem when they enter into a house. Apart from damage they cause by eating food and chewing furniture and other items, a particularly dangerous activity is chewing of wires.
When rats chew wires the negative and positive wires can touch and cause fire.
An exterminator is a person that gets rid of unwanted pests in a house.
In this scenario the exterminator is called to get rid of the rats that chew wires. This is a way to prevent fire outbreak.
So the main reason the home owner calls the exterminator is to keep the house from catching on fire
Must you have clear evidence to put away a criminal? Or can you have some evidence but not as valuable.
(What kind of evidence puts away a criminal)
The government form that provides notice to the alien of the pending immigration removal charges filed against him/her is called:
Answer: Notice to Appear (NTA) policy memorandum (PM) (PDF, 599.37 KB) providing guidance on when USCIS may issue Form I-862, Notice to Appear. An NTA is a document that instructs an individual to appear before an immigration judge. This is the first step in starting removal proceedings against them
Through a series of compromises the delegates were able to agree on the important points of the new plan. After its approval by the convention, the Constitution still had to be ratified by the states. The promise to add a Bill of Rights helped convince Anti-Federalists to approve the new government. In June 1788, New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify the document and the Constitution took effect.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation did not solve some of the problems that the republic was going through and that was why it was necessary to create the federal constitution, which created and gave power to a unified government and which managed to suppress the problems and challenges that the country presented. However, the constitution had to be approved by the delegates of each state and not everyone was willing to approve it. A group of delegates called anti-federalists, believed that the constitution gave the president too much power and that was dangerous.
To have the support of anti-federalists, the federalists agreed to add a bill of rights to the new document, which ended up working.
QUESTION 2
Which of the following can the president issue regarding the execution of legislation that oversees the behavior of
officers and agencies of the executive branch?
the U.S. Constitution amendments
state statutes
executive orders
U.S. Criminal Codes
Click Save and Submit to save and submit Click Save alLaners to save all answers
Save Answers
ere to search
о
RI
а
Answer: Executive orders
Explanation:
One of the powers that comes with being the Head of the Executive branch of government is the power to issue Executive orders. Executive orders are binding to the officers and agencies under the Executive branch as they are under the President.
Executive orders are to be treated as legislation with the full weight of the law. They are still subject to Judicial Review however, to ensure that the President is not issuing orders that contravene the Constitution.
news media is likely to pitch a story toward which political slant?
News media is likely to pitch a story toward a political slant that aligns with their target audience or their own editorial bias.
The political slant of news media can vary significantly depending on the outlet, the journalists involved, and the target audience. Some news organizations strive to maintain impartiality and present news stories in a balanced and objective manner. Certain media outlets may have a known or perceived political leaning. For example, some news organizations may be considered more conservative-leaning, while others may be seen as more liberal-leaning. These outlets might pitch stories or frame their coverage in a way that appeals to their target audience or aligns with their editorial stance.
Additionally, news media can be influenced by market forces and audience preferences. In an increasingly polarized media landscape, where consumers often seek news sources that reaffirm their existing beliefs, media outlets may be inclined to cater to specific political slants to attract and retain their viewers or readers.
It is essential for consumers of news to be aware of potential biases and seek information from a variety of sources to obtain a well-rounded understanding of events and issues. Critical thinking and media literacy skills are vital to evaluate news content, identify potential biases, and form informed opinions.
To learn more about News media click here:
brainly.com/question/30157284
#SPJ11
An accident occurs between a truck and a family vehicle. The truck is owned by a corporation with businesses in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The truck driver is from Ohio. The corporation is incorporated in Delaware but is headquartered in Pennsylvania. The family members in the vehicle include a grandmother domiciled in New Jersey and a mother and daughter domiciled in Connecticut. The accident occurs in New York. The family sues the corporation.
Is there federal jurisdiction?
What states have jurisdiction? (Assume that subject matter jurisdiction requires the incident or the residents of all defendants to be in the state of suit. )
The United States of America is a federal republic made up of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the nation's capital), five major territories, and numerous minor islands.
The states, as well as the United States as a whole, are both sovereign jurisdictions. Any state, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any American territory falls under the jurisdiction of the United States. England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are the three legal jurisdictions of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Learn more about jurisdictions
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
Mrs. Patterson is concerned about the deductibles and co-payments associated with Original Medicare. What can you tell her about Medigap as an option to address this concern?
Since Mrs. Paterson is concerned about the deductibles and co-payments associated with Original Medicare, you can tell her this about Medigap as an option to address this concern: b. Medigap plans help beneficiaries cover coinsurance, co-payments, and/or deductibles for medically necessary services.
What is a health care plan?A health care plan can be defined as a medical plan or an insurance for the medical care of a particular patient which covers a part or whole risk of the medical expenses incurred such as Medicare.
What is Medigap?Medigap can be defined as a set of private health plans and supplemental insurance policies that are designed and developed to work in conjunction with Medicare, especially by taking care of the following:
Coinsurance for medically necessary services.Co-payments for medically necessary services.Deductibles for medically necessary services.Read more on Medigap here: https://brainly.com/question/13172551
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Mrs. Paterson is concerned about the deductibles and co-payments associated with Original Medicare. What can you tell her about Medigap as an option to address this concern? a. If Mrs. Paterson applies during the Medigap open enrollment period, she will have to undergo a medical review to determine if she has a pre-existing condition that would increase the premium for a Medigap policy. b. Medigap plans help beneficiaries cover coinsurance, co-payments, and/or deductibles for medically necessary services. c. All costs not covered by Medicare are covered by some Medigap plans. d. Medigap plans are not sold by private companies and are a government insurance product.
The process by which criminals convert tainted proceeds into apparently legitimate funds or property is known as
A money laundering means the process by which criminals convert tainted proceeds into apparently legitimate funds or property.
What is a money laundering?It refers to the criminal practice of possessing an ill-gotten gains or dirty money through a series of transactions so that the gains appear to be proceeds from legal activities.
Through the means of money laundering, the criminals attempt to transform the proceeds from their crimes into funds of an apparently legal origin.
Therefore, it is the process by which criminals convert tainted proceeds into apparently legitimate funds or property.
Read more about money laundering
brainly.com/question/14137818
#SPJ1
If you are convicted of a DUI you could lose your
a) marriage
b) friends
Oc) children
d) all of the above
Gillcore is about to go public and begin selling securities. As a new public company, what steps must Gillcore take in order to stay in line with the requirements of the Securities Act?
Answer:
The obligations depends on what types of company it is and what type of securities it is offering.
Explanation:
Ideally, the company is required to file a registration statement (discloses all material information concerning the company) and prospectus with the SEC before it may offer its securities for sale. However, the obligations depends on what type of company it is and what type of securities it is offering. This is because SEC classify companies as smaller reporting and emerging growth company hence requires different disclosures that are not misleading in addition to filling registration documents and prospectus.
(85 points!!!!) describe at least three things you could do to uphold the presumption of innocence as a juror is supposed to do.
To uphold the presumption of innocence as a juror, three things you can do are: carefully consider the evidence, separate personal opinions from facts, and maintain open-mindedness throughout the trial.
To uphold the presumption of innocence as a juror, you can:
1. Carefully consider the evidence: Review all evidence presented in court objectively and without any preconceived biases. Evaluate the strength and reliability of the evidence before making any judgments.
2. Separate personal opinions from facts: Base your decision solely on the evidence and instructions provided by the judge. Avoid making assumptions or drawing conclusions based on personal beliefs, media influence, or public opinion.
3. Maintain open-mindedness: Remain open to alternative interpretations of the evidence and different perspectives presented during the trial. Be willing to consider the possibility of the defendant's innocence and give them the benefit of any reasonable doubt.
By following these practices, you demonstrate respect for the presumption of innocence, which is a fundamental principle of the justice system. Upholding the presumption of innocence ensures a fair and impartial trial, where the burden of proof lies with the prosecution and the defendant is considered innocent unless proven guilty.
Learn more about presumption
https://brainly.com/question/31446103
#SPJ11