Which of the following was most significant in influencing organized labor to support the Democratic Party?
A
Herbert Hoover's signing of the Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act
B
Harry Truman's use of the Taft-Hartley Act
C
The passage of the National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act)
D
Woodrow Wilson's appointment of Samuel Gompers to the War Production Board
E
The establishment of welfare capitalism in the 1920s

Answer:

A

Explaination:

Answer and Explanation:

Given the chance to write with both Aquino and Locsin speech, the issue in 1986 I would like to address human rights.  

During fiscal 1986, Japan continued to actively participate in the works of the United Nations dealing with human rights questions. They were dealing with The Third Committee of the General Assembly, the Economic and Social Council, and the Commission on Human Rights.

Activities in these areas were also affected by the financial crisis of the United Nations. Which has been shown in the cancellation of a session of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities.

Besides the human rights questions, there has been a growing tendency in its contemplation at the Commission toward linking human rights issues with those of development. At that time, no doubt, many were participating constructively in the deliberation based on the position and they were saying that the Commission must play an effective role in truly improving the human rights situation.

Human rights were the main thing to deal with that. And it takes a lot to work for the rights of minorities. So I would like to write about humans' rights.

Aquino and Locsin addressed the issues in 1986 for human rights.

Aquino and Locsin issues can be addressed differently as:

1. In the fiscal of 1986, Japan actively participated in the United Stations dealing with human rights. United Nations was dealing with the economic, social, and commission on human rights.

2. The financial crisis also affected United Nations. It was represented by the cancellation of the session of sub-commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities.

3. Human rights are one of the most influential decisions, which affects majority and minority groups of people.

Thus, the speech can be associated with the human rights issues in 1986.

To know more about Human rights, refer to the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/701318

The reason why you are paid for serving on a jury is to cover any expenses that you may have incurred for showing up for jury duty.

The reason why people who are serving on juries are paid, is to cater for their expenses in giving up their time to serve their nation as jurors. There is no law that requires for workers to be paid by employers when serving on the jury and so the pay is to ensure that the person remains compensated.

The pay also covers other expenses such as transportation and food as all these are necessary for the juror to be able to serve effectively on the jury.

Find out more on serving on a jury at https://brainly.com/question/28398380

#SPJ1

if the Columbian Exchange had not brought maize to Europe, the history of the hemisphere that maize traveled to would have been marked by lower agricultural productivity, food shortages, and slower population growth. The absence of maize would have hindered economic development and cultural transformations that occurred as a result of its introduction.

If we consider the introduction of maize (corn) from the Americas to the Old World through the Columbian Exchange, the history of the hemisphere that maize traveled to, particularly Europe, would have been significantly different if this exchange had not occurred.

Maize played a crucial role in European agriculture and diets after its introduction. Prior to the Columbian Exchange, Europeans relied mainly on grains such as wheat, barley, and oats. Maize, with its high yields and adaptability to various climates, brought about a revolution in European agriculture. Its cultivation spread rapidly, especially in regions where traditional grains struggled to thrive.

Without the introduction of maize, Europe would have faced challenges in sustaining its growing population. The increased agricultural productivity provided by maize enabled European societies to support larger populations and experience demographic shifts. The availability of a reliable and high-yielding crop like maize also had significant economic implications, leading to increased trade and the emergence of a more diversified and prosperous European economy.

Furthermore, the introduction of maize had cultural and culinary impacts. It became a staple food in many European regions and influenced traditional cuisines. Its versatility and nutritional value contributed to dietary diversity and improved the overall health and well-being of European populations.

for more questions on economic

https://brainly.com/question/17996535

#SPJ8

One benefit of having bank located in Belcourt is that it provides easier access to financial services for the local community.

A community refers to a group of people who share a common interest, background, or geographic location. It can be a small or large group of individuals who interact, support and rely on each other for social, economic, and cultural needs. Members of a community often share common values, traditions, and beliefs, and they work towards a common goal. The community provides a sense of belonging and identity to its members, and they often engage in activities to improve their well-being, social support, and relationships. Communities can be formed around different aspects such as religion, sports, hobbies, education, or politics. They can be physical or virtual, and they serve as an essential foundation for social cohesion and collective action.

To learn more about community, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13702672

#SPJ1

Answer: The Missouri Compromise of 1820, while repealed just 30 years later, is a benchmark moment in United States history. A bill created with the idea of finding peace and a solution to an ever-growing debate, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would perpetuate the tensions and debates revolving around the hot-button issue of slavery for years to come.  

The exchange of Missouri as a slave state in favor of the ban of slavery north of the 36-30 line and a free Maine was just a temporary solution to the problem. Southerners believed federal regulation of slavery was unconstitutional and to impose a restriction on the instituion of slavery was out of their jurisdiction. Northerners saw the deal as a way to keep the score even and keep the current state of the nation at bay. It was clear that both regions saw the compromise as unjust or unfair to their own side.

Just 30 years later, the debates repeated itself in the form of Kansas and Nebraska. The Missouri Compromise was struck down as unconstitutional, and slavery and anti-slavery proponents rushed into the territory to vote in favor or against the practice. The rush, effectively led to massacre known as Bleeding Kansas and propelled itself into the very real beginnings of the American Civil War.

Explanation:

It was an effort by congress to defuse the sectional and political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri in late 1819. The effect of the Missouri compromise is that it temporarily ended the slavery debate.  

The Missouri Compromise was a federal legislation of the United States that balanced the desires of northern states to prevent the expansion of slavery in the country with those of southern states to expand it. It admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state and declared a policy of prohibiting slavery in the remaining Louisiana Purchase lands north of the 36°30′ parallel.

The 16th United States Congress passed the legislation on March 3, 1820, and President James Monroe signed it on March 6, 1820. Earlier, in February 1819, Representative James Tallmadge Jr., a Democratic-Republican from New York, had submitted two amendments to Missouri's request for statehood that included restrictions on slavery.

Southerners objected to any bill that imposed federal restrictions on slavery and believed that it was a state issue, as settled by the Constitution.

Learn more about Missouri, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14020956

#SPJ5

Answer: As the formulation of the sentence itself states, it is about pressure.

Explanation:

The pressure is one of the mechanisms that stakeholders use to achieve their goals. The goals of these groups are different. They can be political, social, and economical. The list contains some other elements used by interest groups, such as the lobbying of political officials and the media. Also, interest groups make and organized campaigns to realize their interests.

Answer:

government power is shared

Explanation:

the federal government is surely part of the tiers of government and there are three

Option (a), Sedition is the use of words or actions to encourage rebellion against the ruling class or to undermine the democratic process.

The Sedition Act made it against the law for Americans to "print, utter, or publish any untrue, scandalous, & malicious writing" about the government. The laws were directed at the Democratic-Republican party, which newcomers typically support.

The advocates of the Sedition Act were accurate that false information might permeate public opinion and pose a serious threat to the legitimacy of the government, despite the fact that their definition of what constituted lies at the time was later found to be erroneous. Because of this, the Sedition Act was an ineffective remedy.

Learn more about Sedition Act: https://brainly.com/question/11554212

#SPJ1

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The cultural region is defined as the geography that involves activities of homogeneous people or complex of activities (culture).

The cultural region can be large or relatively small because different group of people has a different culture. For example: India is a diverse country with many cultures as it carries small and large cultural regions.

Hence, the given statement is "True".

There are different definitions of regions. cultural regions can be large or relatively small is a true statement.

A region is simply known by its natural or artificial characteristics. It is defined by its Language, government, or religion, forests, etc.

A cultural region is simply known as that region that is known by its common characteristics of the people living in that place. They often speak the same language, practice the same religion, share the same customs etc.

Learn more about regions from

https://brainly.com/question/13898621

If we are looking at the events of the Reform Movement in the United States, the first event would be: A. Second Great Awakening.

During the early 19th century, a religious revitalization movement known as the Second Great Awakening took place, spanning from the late 1700s to the mid-1800s.

This movement was defined by heightened religious devotion, as well as an emphasis on individual redemption and ethical virtue. The outcome was noticeable growth in the number of individuals joining churches, the formation of fresh religious groups, and a focus on bringing about changes in social attitudes.

Learn more about  the Reform Movement  from

https://brainly.com/question/14276383

#SPJ1

This psychologist was the pioneering cognitive scientist Ebbinghaus and he studied memory in the early 20th century.

The psychologist in question is the pioneering cognitive scientist Hermann Ebbinghaus. His research focused on the study of memory in the first half of the 20th century, particularly investigating the different kinds of information that we encounter in everyday life. He was the first to systematically describe the forgetting curve and his groundbreaking studies revealed the importance of repetition as a learning tool. He was also one of the first to investigate the effects of mnemonics on memory retention and the power of associations in the learning process. Ebbinghaus' discoveries changed the way memory is studied and taught, and his ideas are still relevant in modern psychology.

To know more about psychologist click below:

https://brainly.com/question/3833605#

#SPJ4

Answer:

To find the average change in temperature each minute in the first trial of the experiment, we need to add up all of the temperature changes Edgar recorded and divide by the number of temperature changes he recorded. We can represent this with the following expression:(2 degrees F x 4) + (3 degrees F x 3) + (0 degrees F x 2) + (6 degrees F x 1) / 10 temperature changes= 8 degrees F + 9 degrees F + 0 degrees F + 6 degrees F / 10 temperature changes= 23 degrees F / 10 temperature changes= 2.3 degrees F/minuteThis means that the average change in temperature each minute in the first trial of the experiment was 2.3 degrees F.To find the average change in temperature each minute in the second trial of the experiment, we need to determine the average change in temperature each minute in the second trial. This value will be greater than 2.3 degrees F, since the average change in temperature each minute was greater in the second trial than in the first trial. However, we do not have any information about the specific temperature changes Edgar recorded in the second trial, so it is not possible to calculate the average change in temperature each minute in the second trial.

Answer:

It was different for people in the Middle Ages because The Middle Ages were based on religion. Humanism focused on human thinking and logic. They were against faith, tradition, and devotion.

Answer:

A promise by the United States to keep peace to the American continents.

Better answer:

The Monroe Doctrine was a statement of U.S. foreign policy issued by President James Monroe in 1823. It declared that the Western Hemisphere was no longer open for colonization or territorial expansion by European powers, and that any attempt by a European power to interfere in the affairs of the newly independent nations of the Americas would be considered a threat to the security and interests of the United States. The doctrine was intended to assert U.S. leadership and influence in the Western Hemisphere, and to prevent European intervention in the region.

the queen of England

Explanation:

It was named after Queen Henrietta Maria wife of Charles 1

l.Subía a la Hira, una cueva en la montaña Jabal Al-Sur, situada en la región de Hejaz a 3,2 km de La Meca, la actual Arabia Saudita. Allí recibió sus primeras revelaciones, la primera revelación de Mahoma la recibió La Noche del Qadr, de la mano del Arcáng

el Gabriel.

Answer:

The answer is D (he must worship and obey only Allah)

Explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

The Cold War was a moment of great anger and uncertainty, and a nuclear holocaust was a predictable reality. Many of the developments (during the conflict) that affected the relationship between a government and its citizens are generally neglected. These developments presumably resulted from the war, yet they happened during it and eroded the state's sovereignty. The extension of government freedom has impacted how people interact. Each nation was committed to offering a better, safer, and more inclusive environment for its people despite the war's animosity. People's freedom fails governments, nevertheless. Dissatisfied with Cold War policy and government actions, they can now question their leaders. Large-scale protests, strikes, and upheavals followed, sponsored by elite citizens with out-of-step cultural and social expectations. In the 1960s, large-scale rallies against the Vietnam War were widespread in the U.S. Another example is Khrushchev's opening ceremony in Russia. Most of the time's notable activities were planned by international students. It wasn't accidental and is now linked to education, which eroded state sovereignty. Increased university enrollment created more awareness.

Explanation:

This is my point-of-view, and you are welcome to alter it.

More on the Cold War?

https://brainly.com/question/15837692

Most regions of the world have some form of capitalist economic system, but some of the most prominent examples include:

1. North America: The United States and Canada have long had capitalist economies, with private ownership of businesses and a free market system.

2. Europe: Many countries in Europe, including the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Italy, have capitalist economies that are characterized by private ownership of businesses, competition, and market-based pricing.

3. Asia: Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan are examples of countries in Asia that have adopted capitalist economic systems, with private ownership of businesses and market-based pricing.

4. Australia and New Zealand: These countries have capitalist economies that are similar to those of North America and Europe, with private ownership of businesses and a free market system.

5. Latin America: Many countries in Latin America, including Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina, have capitalist economies, although they may also have elements of socialism or state intervention in certain sectors.

Answer:

Several regions of the world had capitalist economic systems before 1990.

Explanation:

Most of Western Europe, including countries like the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Benelux countries had capitalist market economies. They ranged from social market economies to more laissez-faire models.

Both the United States and Canada had well-established capitalist systems, though Canada's economy had more government intervention.

Japan developed a capitalist economy after World War 2, though it featured more government guidance and corporate collaboration.

Other developed Asian economies like South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore also had capitalist systems, though often with a strong government role.

Many Latin American countries like Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, etc. had capitalist market economies, although they were often mixed with elements of state control. Income inequality was also high.'

Countries like Australia and New Zealand had free-market capitalist economies with strong social safety nets and government intervention.

Some Gulf states like the UAE and Saudi Arabia were developing capitalist economies fueled by their oil wealth, though typically with authoritarian political systems.

A few countries in sub-Saharan Africa like South Africa and Kenya had functioning capitalist markets, though they were often combined with significant state involvement in the economy.

So in summary, while the majority of the world's population lived in mixed economies or socialist/command economies before 1990, there were diverse capitalist systems present in many regions, especially Western Europe, North America, parts of Asia and some countries in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America.

B

i just answered this on mine and it was right

Answer:No, i doubt it.

Explanation:

Christopher Columbus was a Italian navigator,and sailed across the sea hoping to find a direct route on the water from Europe to Asia,but instead,he found america.If he had found the water route instead ,then america probably wouldn't have been found until later,which means that the things that happened that are our history,might not have happened.

Answer:

the death of the general

Explanation:

without the general tht had to ended he war

Answer:

it is B

Explanation:

The battle of Gonzales is typically considered to be the beginning of the Texas Revolution

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

Answer:

D.South Texas Plains....

Answer: D: South Texas plains

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

no

Answer:

Pasic himself delivered the Serbian answer to the ultimatum to Gieslingen at the Austrian embassy, just before the 6 p.m. deadline. Serbia’s response effectively accepted all terms of the ultimatum but one: it would not accept Austria-Hungary’s participation in any internal inquiry, stating that this would be a violation of the Constitution and of the law of criminal procedure. This response did much to appeal Pasic and his country to international observers of the conflict; to Vienna, however, it made little difference. Gieslingen, bags packed and car waiting to drive him to the railroad station, broke the Dual Monarchy’s diplomatic relations with Serbia and left to catch his train. Three days later, on July 28, 1914, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, beginning the First World War.

Explanation: