The buffalo soldiers were d. peacetime, all-Black U.S. Army regiment .
"American Indians soldiers who fought in the Indian wars were referred to the black cavalry troops as "buffalo soldiers" because of their dark, curly hair, which look like a buffalo's skin and also their wild nature of fighting. This name soon became famous with all African-American regiments formed in 1866".
"Their main responsibility was to support the westward expansion of nation by securing settlers, building roads and infrastructure, and guarding the U.S. mail".
"They played a crucial role until the 1890s, Black soldiers comprised 20 protecting settlers, building forts and roads, frontier cavalry and drawing the wilderness as the U.S. performed cautionary service within a developed the West".
question-
a. Members of the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantryb. Black Confederate soldiersc. The United States Colored Troops Regimentsd. A peacetime, all-Black U.S. Army regimentTo learn more about Buffalo Soldiers,
https://brainly.com/question/15701962
#SPJ4
What justification did the Zhou use for overthrowing the Shang dynasty, and why?
The Zhou created the Mandate of Heaven: the idea that there could be only one legitimate ruler of China at a time, and that this ruler had the blessing of the gods. They used this Mandate to justify their overthrow of the Shang, and their subsequent rule.
Answer:
The Zhou created the Mandate of Heaven: the idea that there could be only one legitimate ruler of China at a time, and that this ruler had the blessing of the gods. They used this Mandate to justify their overthrow of the Shang, and their subsequent rule.
Explanation:
Paano napatunayan ni Jia Li na siya ay isang mabuti at mapagmahal na anak at apo?
wag siyang matigas Ang ulo at pag butihan Ang pag aaral Niya.
Explanation:
mahalin niya Ang kaniyang pamilya.
30 POINTS!! ESSAY: WHEN A FRIEND IS SUFFERING After seeing how Job's friends treated him during his time of suffering, how will you treat a friend who is going through a difficult time? What would you do differently and what would you do the same? Here is your goal for this assignment: Write an essay critiquing the response of Job's friends Apply the example (both positive and negative) set by Job's friends to your own experience. In answering the questions above, structure an essay of no less than 300-500 words, i.e., ½- to 1-page, in three parts following the outline below: Summary of the approach that Job's friends took in "comforting" Job Assessment of what they did right and what they did wrong Description of what you would do differently from Job's friends
Answer:
When considering Job's friend's approach, first, one must take into account Job's current situation. He had lost all of his sons, his wealth, his health, and probably the respect of others around him and his friends did little or nothing to ease his pain. For example, when trying to comfort him, Bildad, said that if Job's son died, it's because they were sinners or evil men and they deserved to die. Eliphaz hinted that Job was not a righteous man, and he was being punished by God, who doesn't value the good actions of his servants.
When reading their full speech, one can see how they not only failed to ease Job's suffering, but also contributed to increase it. Blaming him from his suffering, blaming God, or insinuating that God was cruel. A God that Job deeply believed in. If one could say that they did at least something right is that they stopped Job from feeling sorry of himself. And when the last of his friends Elihu stepped in he helped him to see the bigger picture. And how he could still be a good man, and be suffering, because he was not perfect, and he could make mistakes.
A better approach could have been starting with kind words, feeling truly sorry for his loss, helping him to see that his sons had no blame in what happened, and that God could still be there to support him. And when the time was right, help him to stop feeling sorry of himself, in a kind but strong way, as Elihu did.
PLS HELP ME MY TEST IS TIMED AND IM IN A BATHROOM STALL I GOT A PIC FORM THE QUESTION! YOU DONT HAVE TO DO QUESTION 7 BUT I NEED HELP ON 6 THE A AND B ONE
Answer:
1. a
2. b
3. d
4. c
5. e
6. f
Explanation:
Which famous general commanded the allied invasion of normandy?
The famous general that commanded the allied invasion of normandy is General Dwight D. Eisenhower
During World War II, General Dwight D. Eisenhower was chosen to serve as the Supreme Allied Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force.
The long, sloping beaches of Normandy were chosen as the site of the landings after great consideration. There, the Allies would benefit from a surprise factor. The Pas de Calais region, north of the Seine river, where the English Channel is the narrowest, was where the German high command anticipated the attack to occur. After being informed by Allied covert spies acting as German sympathizers that the invasion would take place in the Pas de Calais, Adolf Hitler had deployed the majority of his panzer units here.
Learn more about Normandy Invasion:
brainly.com/question/17130189
#SPJ4
most countries abandoned silver as a backer of currency after the great depression.
a. True
b. False
Answer: False
Explanation:
can you please help I need to read Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address and write a short report explaining Lincoln's desires for the nation after the war.
Answer:
Lincoln's main concern in his Second Inaugural Address was peace.
Lincoln sees the War as the divine retribution for the United State's sin of slavery. He states that both sides wanted to avoid war but one, the South, for its economical reasons, the ownership of slaves, wanted to tear the nation asunder, and the other went to war because they could not let the nation perish, the North. Lincoln wants that people forget their grudges and to together heal the wounded nation. To forget retribution and "with malice toward none, with charity for all" rebuild the torn nation.
Please mark my answer the brainliest and rate me 5 star.please please please please please please
What is the one check that the courts have
against the power of both the President and
Congress?
Answer: Judicial Review
Explanation: Judicial Review allows the Supreme Court to declare any law passed by the president or Congress as unconstitutional.
Answer:^_^
Explanation:well president controls power, goverment , and laws.
What does the word parallel mean when giving directions to someone to find a location?
What was the role of the dutch in the Caribbean?
Answer:
The Netherlands and its people have made contributions to in arts, science, technology and engineering, economics and finance, cartography and geography, exploration and navigation, law and jurisprudence, thought and philosophy, medicine. and agriculture.
Explanation:
How are most state constitutions different from the us constitution?
a.
they are amended annually.
b.
they are longer and more detailed.
c.
they must be approved by the federal legislature.
d.
they do not include a bill of rights.
State constitutions are typically longer and more detailed compared to the US Constitution. Therefore, option b is correct.
State constitutions are the fundamental legal frameworks that govern the individual states within the United States. Unlike the US Constitution, which provides the overarching framework for the federal government, state constitutions are specific to each state and outline their governance structure, powers, and limitations.
State constitutions tend to be longer and more detailed, covering a wider range of issues including state-specific matters such as local government structures, education systems, and taxation. They also often include a bill of rights that enumerates the rights and protections afforded to individuals within the state.
Therefore, option b is correct.
Learn more about State constitutions here:
https://brainly.com/question/32810600
#SPJ4
how did Great Britain violated America's freedom of the seas during the early 1800s
IF DONT KNOW ANSWER DONT ANSWER
-
1. All the following countries were empires except
a) Austria-Hungary
c) Poland
b) Russia
d) The Ottomans
Answer:
Austria-Hungary
Explanation:
Source 1:
"The British . . . have for many decades had settled notions about India's future. Their concept of party government and parliamentary rule has become the ideal with them as the best form of government for every country. . . .
It is extremely difficult to appreciate why our Hindu friends fail to understand the real nature of Islam and Hinduism. It is only a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality. This misconception of one Indian nation will lead India to destruction if we fail to revise our notions in time. The Hindus and Muslims in India belong to two different religious philosophies, social customs, literatures. . . . They have different epics and different heroes. Very often the hero of one is a foe of the other. To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority, must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be built up for the government of such a state."
Muhammad Ali Jinnah, leader of the All-India Muslim League, an organization of Indian Muslims that had split from the Indian National Congress, address to a meeting of the League, March 1940
Source 2:
"We, the inhabitants of India, have one thing in common and that is our India-ness, which we share despite our religious and cultural differences. Just as our different features and personalities do not affect our common humanity, so our religious and cultural differences should not interfere with our shared association with our homeland. Therefore, like other religious groups in India, we Muslims have a duty to struggle for the attainment of our common Indian interests and fight against the evils that hamper our common progress and prosperity. This is what I mean when I speak of a common nationhood of all Indians. The [Indian National] Congress, having the same position as ours, has made provisions for the protection of all religions, cultures, and languages in a future Indian state.
On the other hand, the European concept of nationalism is unacceptable to our organization. We denounce it and are totally against it."
Husain Ahmad Madani, leader of the Council of Indian Muslim Religious Scholars, address to the annual meeting of the organization, June 1940
These excerpts exemplify how Muhammad Ali Jinnah, head of the All-India Muslim League, and Husain Ahmad Madani, leader of the Council of Indian Muslim Religious Scholars, hold divergent viewpoints about the essence of Indian patriotism and the interfaith dynamics between Hindus and Muslims in India.
What are their different perspectives?Jinnah believes that Hindus and Muslims in India possess unique religious, social, and cultural backgrounds. Consequently, any attempts to establish a unified Indian nation would result in dissatisfaction and the collapse of the governing framework. He posits that the notion of party governance and parliamentary rule, deemed optimal by the British, might not be apt for India.
Madani stresses the collective identity of Indians that goes beyond variations in religion and culture. This is diametrically opposed to the idea of differentiation.
He thinks that Muslims should focus on shared Indian goals and efforts to overcome any barriers that impede the nation's advancement, much like other religious communities in India.
He endorses the Congress party's measures aimed at safeguarding the entirety of religions, cultures, and languages within a prospective Indian nation.
Read more about perspectives here:
https://brainly.com/question/13107415
#SPJ1
4. What was the main reason for sectional differences that existed in the United States in the early 1800s?
M. The North, South, and West produced similar products and were in competition with each other.
P. The North, South, and West had differing economic and political goals.
R. The North, South, and West were culturally unique because they attracted Immigrants from different parts of
the world.
S. The North, South, and West needed the same natural resources to produce products.
The correct answer is "the North, South, and West had differing economic and political goals."
The main reason for sectional differences that existed in the United States in the early 1800s was that the North, South, and West had differing economic and political goals.
Indeed, it was a time of notorious divisions and sectorial differences between the North and the South of the United States.
At that time, there were 22 states considered from the North, and 11 from the South. The northern states were against segregation, while southern states supported slavery. Indeed, the economy of the southern states depended on the use of slaves to work in the large plantations producing the kinds of crops needed to be exported to Europe. On the other hand, the industries flourished and spread throughout the north. The DIfference increased to the degree of separation. The South ceded from the Union and formed the Confederate States, and then, the inevitable: the beginning of the American Civil War.
Which country is farther south, portugal or spain?.
Spain is further south than Portugal. Spain, officially known as the Kingdom of Spain, is a European country situated on the Iberian Peninsula.
Spain is bordered to the north by France and Andorra, to the west by Portugal, to the south by the British territory of Gibraltar and the Mediterranean Sea, and to the east and south by the Mediterranean Sea and the Gulf of Valencia. More Information about Spain: Spain is the second-largest country in the European Union, with a total area of 505,990 km².
Madrid is the capital city of Spain, and the official language is Spanish, and it is the 4th most spoken language globally. The currency used in Spain is Euro (EUR). The southernmost point of mainland Portugal, known as Cape St. Vincent, is located at approximately 37.0 degrees north latitude. On the other hand, the southernmost point of mainland Spain, known as Punta de Tarifa, is situated at approximately 36.0 degrees north latitude.
To learn more about Portugal visit here:
brainly.com/question/28787883
#SPJ11
who were the French were assisted by during the "French and Indian war"?
Answer:
France and its colonists and Indian allies fought against Britain, its colonists and Indian allies. French and Indian war was fought between france and great britain over land in what is now the United States
Explanation:
France, French colonists, and their Native allies against Great Britain, the Anglo-American colonists, and the Iroquois Confederacy
Hey, guys I need help :P
Answer:
the Ans will be no A
Explanation:
because it is the best ans for it
Answer:
I would say C
Explanation:
Many public works were made to end slavery. Depending what time you could say Frederick douglas was one of these people.
What was the name of the bomb dropped in Hiroshima?
Answer:
Little boy
Explanation:
Which famous early schoolbook taught colonial children to read using verses from the Bible?
Answer:
One of the early schoolbooks that taught colonial children to read using verses from the Bible was the "New England Primer," since at this time religion and education were very much intertwined.
Explanation:
Hope this helps !!
-BB <3
Please mark me brainly
commodore
cornelius vanderbilt
j.o. Morgan
John D. Rockefeller
Andrew Carnegie
Answer:
John D. Rockefeller
Explanation:
Which of the following was not a Spanish group?
a. folsom
b. desert cultures
clovis
d. all of the above
C.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
Hope it help you
Stayhomestaysafe
Plz mark my answer brainliest✍️✍️
Explanation:
d. all of the aboveThe Folsom people were not Spanish, same with the Clovis people. Desert Cultures a term for main people who lived in the desert (Native Americans) Native americans are not mexicans.
Answer:
d all of the above
Explanation:
Why did Jackson form the Democratic party?
Answer: As president, Andrew Jackson strengthened the power of the presidency, defended the Union, gained new respect for the United States in foreign affairs and pushed the country toward democracy.
Explanation:
The United States Constitution is said to be a “living document“ in part because court interpretations change over time.
What was the key aspect of Plessy v. Ferguson, A supreme court decision that was later overturned?
A: Non-citizens gain the right to vote in local elections under the 26th amendment
B: poll taxes were outlawed as a prerequisite for voting under the 24th amendment
C: The principle of separation of church and state was applied under the first amendment
D: The “separate but equal“ doctrine was applied to the fourth amendment
Which of the following was a part of the ‘one time forgiveness law’? A. They would be forgiven for a crime B. It could only be used once. C. They had to confess to a priest. D. All of the above
Answer:
Dont open that link or they will track you down hope this help so you dont get kidnapped. :) ask the question again in another one mark me brainlist pls
Early in the struggle to win Kansas, proslavery supporters
1. provided an excellent example of how the legal and orderly implementation of popular sovereignty might take place.
2. got no support from the presidential administration of Millard Fillmore.
3. from out of state invaded Kansas, to control the election through fraud and intimidation.
4. saw that the cause was lost and retreated from the contest.
Proslavery supporters from out of state invaded Kansas, seeking to control the election through fraud and intimidation.
The struggle to win Kansas during the mid-19th century was marked by intense conflict between proslavery and antislavery factions. To address the statements provided:
The first statement, "provided an excellent example of how the legal and orderly implementation of popular sovereignty might take place," is not accurate. Popular sovereignty, the idea that the residents of a territory should decide on the issue of slavery through a popular vote, was proposed as a solution to the slavery issue. However, the implementation of popular sovereignty in Kansas was far from orderly or legal. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which introduced popular sovereignty, led to a violent struggle known as "Bleeding Kansas." Both proslavery and antislavery supporters engaged in acts of violence and fraud, undermining any notion of a legal and orderly process.
The second statement, "got no support from the presidential administration of Millard Fillmore," is partially true. Millard Fillmore served as the President of the United States from 1850 to 1853, preceding the events in Kansas. However, the struggle in Kansas occurred during the presidency of Franklin Pierce, who succeeded Fillmore. While Fillmore did not directly involve himself in the Kansas conflict, his administration had pursued policies that aimed to maintain the delicate balance between the North and South on the slavery issue, such as the Compromise of 1850.
The third statement, "from out of state invaded Kansas, to control the election through fraud and intimidation," is accurate. During the struggle for Kansas, proslavery supporters from neighboring states, particularly Missouri, crossed the border into Kansas to influence the outcome of the elections. They engaged in acts of fraud, intimidation, and voter suppression to ensure that Kansas would be admitted to the Union as a slave state.
The fourth statement, "saw that the cause was lost and retreated from the contest," is not entirely accurate. The proslavery supporters did not retreat from the contest entirely. Despite setbacks, the proslavery faction continued their efforts to maintain control in Kansas. However, the eventual victory of the antislavery forces and the passage of the Kansas Constitution in 1859, which prohibited slavery, marked a turning point in the struggle.
Overall, the struggle for Kansas was a tumultuous period marked by violence, fraud, and intense competition between proslavery and antislavery factions. The conflict in Kansas played a significant role in the lead-up to the American Civil War.
Know more about Implementations here:
https://brainly.com/question/32181414
#SPJ11
What is a characteristic of ancient Greek and Roman religion?
A
belief that many gods exists
B
belief that only a single god exists
с
belief that all natural objects have spirits
D
belief that kings are descended from gods
The characteristic of ancient Greek and Roman religion is belief that many gods and goddesses exists. Hence, the correct option is A.
What is Greek and Roman religion?Greek and Roman religion was polytheistic, belief in many god, ancient Greeks and Romans worshipped many gods and goddesses.
Devout members of both groups believed that there were gods who influenced all natural phenomena/resources.
The most-striking characteristic of Greek religion was the belief in a multiplicity of anthropomorphic deities under the one supreme god. Priests simply looked after the cults, they did not constitute a clergy, and there were no sacred books.
Learn more about Greek and Roman Religion here:
https://brainly.com/question/3055520
#SPJ5
Please help me!!
What did the United States hope to accomplish in the Gulf War?
Answer:
Though the Gulf War was recognized as a decisive victory for the coalition, Kuwait and Iraq suffered enormous damage, and Saddam Hussein was not forced from power.
Explanation:
which amendment expanded the right to vote the most
Give an example of corruption in the Roman Republic.
Answer: Rome’s continued expansion resulted in money and revenue for the Republic. Corruption and bribery increased in the government for officials to gain power and access to this money.Rich people bought votes and gave favors to friends. Bribery and corruption were rampant and led to the commoners distrusting the Senate. Many people were brought back as slaves from Rome’s conquests. The capture of slaves created an influx of cheap labor and hurt the lower classes and disrupted the agricultural system. Many local farmers could not compete with the wealthy farms that used slave labor and eventually lost their land. When Rome’s conquests declined, so did their sources of income. This decrease in money resulted in a loss of support for the people of Rome and created an enormous stress on the economy. Officials began to tax their citizens furthering discontent.