The president promotes policies through the media.
By communications, what do you mean?Send or receive messages through both verbal and non-verbal means is the process of communication. The goal of communication is to create understanding between two or more people by sharing information in the shape of thoughts, views, and ideas in a two-way fashion.
What does a major in communications entail?Mass media, scientific communications, and advertising are all topics covered by communication majors. They gain writing skills for technical documents, long-form essays, and press releases. Students in an action plan develop their writing and speaking abilities to get them ready for professions in fields that are expanding.
To know more about communications visit;
https://brainly.com/question/9673382
#SPJ4
What is the importance of studying criminology in the social science
Answer: They conduct research, teach and work with different kinds of law enforcement agencies.
They also study the social and psychological factors that cause people to commit crimes and research which approaches to rehabilitation work and maybe do not work.
Explanation:
Which type of corrections are alternatives that fall between probation and a prison sentence?
Answer:
1. Fines
2.Restitution
3. Community service
4. Probation
5. House arrest
6. work release
Explain the justifying circumstance of self defense.
Answer:
Self-defense is a justifying circumstance which is governed by Article 11 of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines: “The following do not incur any criminal liability: 1) Anyone who acts in defense of his person or rights, provided the following circumstances concur:
Explanation:
Answer:
In order to invoke self-defense, certain conditions must be met such as unlawful aggression, reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it, and lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself. Anent the 1st element, the aggression must be unlawful.
at which stage of the hearing are defendants brought before a judge to possibly be afforded the opportunity for bail?
Answer:
This first appearance is called an arraignment and it is here that the bail decision is generally made. Frequently cases are resolved at the arraignment.
Explanation:
A(n) ___ is a type of microscope that can analyze the characteristic glow of different fibers.
Explain five functions of council of
state
Answer:
Powers and Functions of the Council of Ministers:
(i) Formulation of Policies:
(ii) Administration and Maintenance of Public Order:
(iii) Appointments:
(iv) Guiding the Legislature:
(v) Control over the State Exchequer:
(vi) Execution of Central Laws and Decisions of the Union Government:
Explanation:
the first amendment prohibits state regulation of deceptive commercial advertising. true or false
False. The first amendment does not prohibit state regulation of deceptive commercial advertising. In fact, the government has the power to regulate commercial speech to prevent false or misleading advertising that could harm consumers.
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, but it does not entirely prohibit state regulation of deceptive commercial advertising. States can regulate deceptive or misleading commercial speech to protect consumers and maintain fair competition.
learn more about deceptive
https://brainly.com/question/13045267
#SPJ11
Janet, a twenty year old women, applied for a position driving a truck for Federal Trucking Inc. Janet, who is 5'4" tall and weighs 135 pounds, was denied the job because the company requires that all employees be at least 5'6" tall and weigh at least 150 pounds. Federal justifies this requirement on the basis that its drivers are frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries. Janet brings a course of action. Has Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act?
Answer:
Yes Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 frowns at any form of discrimination or conditions set up people or organizations which hinders any form of equal treatment of people. The weight and height criteria are unjust methods in determining work eligibility. Tests such as that of physical fitness and strength should instead be carried out on the applicants. The Federal Trucking should also ensure there are better working conditions to make the job of frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries easier and less tedious.
Which constitutional provision forbids conflict between state and federal laws?
Supremacy Clause
Habeas Corpus
Elastic Clause
Ex Post Facto
Explain your reasoning for choosing this answer:
Answer:
doctrine of preemption
Explanation:
Under the doctrine of preemption, which is based on the Supremacy Clause, federal law preempts state law, even when the laws conflict.Jun 2, 2017
"Supremacy Clause" constitutional provision forbids conflict between state and federal laws. Correct option is a.
The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, and it states:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties take precedence over any conflicting state laws. This ensures that there is uniformity in the application and enforcement of federal laws across all states and prevents conflicts or inconsistencies between state and federal regulations.
To know more about constitutional:
https://brainly.com/question/4555568
#SPJ6
The highest court in Ghana is Court of appeal a. b. Circuit court c. District court d. Supreme court.
what is a legal doctrine holding employers liable for the wrongful acts of their employees in certain cases?
The legal doctrine that holds employers liable for the wrongful acts of their employees in certain cases is known as "vicarious liability.
"When an employee's wrongful conduct causes harm or injury to someone else, vicarious liability applies. Employers can be held liable for their employees' wrongful acts under certain circumstances, according to this doctrine. Employers' legal responsibility for their workers' actions is referred to as vicarious liability. An employer may be held liable for the wrongful conduct of its employees under this legal doctrine if the act was committed within the scope of employment, meaning that it was carried out in furtherance of the employer's business or as part of the employee's job duties.Therefore, if an employee causes harm to another person while performing their work duties, the employer may be held responsible for the employee's actions. Vicarious liability has been applied to a variety of situations, including automobile accidents caused by employees, intentional torts committed by employees, and medical malpractice committed by healthcare practitioners working for hospitals or medical groups.Learn more about legal doctrine: https://brainly.com/question/30508424
#SPJ11
T/F: a court decision that makes an offer illegal automatically terminates the offer.
True. A court decision declaring an offer illegal automatically terminates the offer.
In general, a court decision that deems an offer illegal does result in the automatic termination of the offer. When a court determines that an offer is illegal, it essentially renders the offer void and unenforceable. This means that the parties involved in the offer are no longer bound by its terms, and they cannot legally proceed with accepting or fulfilling the offer.
The court's decision serves as a legal pronouncement that the offer is against the law or violates public policy, and as a consequence, it becomes null and void. It is important to note that this automatic termination of the offer occurs due to the court's intervention and not due to any action or agreement of the parties involved.
Learn more about Court here: brainly.com/question/11622979
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer.
Which factor is a common link between routine activity theory and life course theory?
Answer:
Which factor is a common link between routine activity theory and life course theory?
Explanation:
Routine activity theory, like the related lifestyle-exposure theory, emerged as a key theoretical approach in criminology in the late 1970s. Routine activities refer to generalized patterns of social activities in a society (i.e., spatial and temporal patterns in family, work, and leisure activities).
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11
Case law is derived from judges' decisions for actual cases. True or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Case law, also known as common law, is derived from judges' decisions for actual cases. When judges make decisions in a case, their decisions can become binding on future cases that fall within the same jurisdiction and involve similar facts or legal issues. These binding decisions, also known as precedents, create the body of case law that is used to interpret and apply the law in future cases. Therefore, case law plays an important role in the legal system as it provides guidance for judges, lawyers, and individuals on how the law should be interpreted and applied in specific situations.
since 1964, the new york times v. sullivan case has served as the standard for __________ law.
In the historic 1964 decision New York Times v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the First Amendment's safeguards for free expression place a limit on the capacity of public officials to bring libel lawsuits.
What five protections does the First Amendment offer?Religion, expression, the free press, the right to petition and the right to assemble are the five core values of our society that the First Amendment of our Constitution safeguards. Through the course of our history, our unflinching adherence to these ideals has endured challenging conflicts and remained a pillar of our democracy. It safeguards five rights: freedom of expression, of the press, of the press, of assembly, and of petitioning the government. The citizens of the United States of America are the most liberated in the world thanks to these five protected rights. Religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition are all protected by the First Amendment. It prohibits Congress from endorsing one religion above others and from imposing restrictions on a person's religious practises.To learn more about First Amendment's safeguards, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/19914204
what may be the result of replacing an existing life insurance policy with a new one?
During a trial, a witness (Heidi) claims that the defendant couldn’t have committed the crime because she was with the defendant all day. The prosecution receives a note from their assistant that says "Heidi is complicit. " What is the note suggesting? A. Heidi was a victim of the defendant’s crimes. B. Heidi is helping the defendant get away with the crime. C. Heidi is being blackmailed by the defendant to lie in court. D. Heidi actually doesn’t know anything about the defendant’s crimes
While presenting their case, the prosecutor must establish all components of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. must demonstrate that the accused stole something from a retailer.
When is guilt established beyond a reasonable doubt?The burden of proving the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal proceeding rests on the prosecution. The prosecution must persuade the jury, in other words, that the evidence in the case cannot be explained by any other logical explanation.
Why does reasonable doubt matter?A doubt that is supported by logic and common sense, as opposed to pure guesswork, is considered to be reasonable. It may result from a careful and unbiased evaluation of all the evidence or from a lack thereof.
To know more about prosecutor visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/30404247
#SPJ1
What is a group of design theory?
Answer:
it is said to be an Abelian group
Explanation:
Which of the following made NATO intervention in Kosovo unique compared to earlier interventions?
a. NATO was intervening in a dispute between sovereign states.
b. NATO was intervening in a rogue state.
c. NATO was intervening to protect human rights.
d. NATO was intervening within a sovereign state.
NATO was intervening within a sovereign state made NATO intervention in Kosovo unique compared to earlier interventions. The correct answer is d.
NATO's intervention in Kosovo was unique compared to earlier interventions because it was the first time that NATO had intervened in a conflict within a sovereign state.
NATO's intervention was justified on the grounds that it was necessary to protect human rights and to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe. However, NATO's intervention was controversial, and some critics argued that it violated international law.
The Kosovo War was an armed conflict in Kosovo that lasted from 28 February 1998 until 11 June 1999.
It was fought between the forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (i.e. Serbia and Montenegro), which controlled Kosovo before the war, and the Kosovo Albanian rebel group known as the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA).
The conflict ended when the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) intervened by beginning air strikes in March 1999 which resulted in Yugoslav forces withdrawing from Kosovo.
NATO's intervention in Kosovo was the first time that NATO had intervened in a conflict within a sovereign state. NATO's intervention was justified on the grounds that it was necessary to protect human rights and to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe.
However, NATO's intervention was controversial, and some critics argued that it violated international law.
The Kosovo War was a major turning point in the history of the Balkans. It led to the independence of Kosovo and the end of Serbian control over the region.
It also had a significant impact on the development of international law and the role of NATO in the post-Cold War era. Therefore, the correct option is D, NATO was intervening within a sovereign state.
To know more about NATO, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28310075#
#SPJ11
Reserved powers are NOT found within the ______________________.
what are the three competence expect from good/ideal citizens
Answer: Citizenship competencies allow for citizens to respect and defend human rights, to contribute actively to a peaceful living, to participate responsibly and constructively in the democratic processes and to respect and value plurality and differences.
Explanation:
The three competence expect from good/ideal citizens are that the citizenship competencies enable citizens to respect and defend human rights, actively contribute to peaceful living, responsibly and constructively participate in democratic processes.
What are the human rights?Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination.
Human rights are fundamental rights that all of us have simply by virtue of our humanity. They exemplify important societal values such as fairness, dignity, equality, and respect. They are a significant form of protection for all of us, especially those who may be subjected to abuse, neglect, or isolation.
Learn more about the human rights, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ5
a property owner who owns his property in fee simple does not have to abide by zoning regulations. group of answer choices true false
Owning a property in fee simple, which confers unlimited ownership, enjoyment, and transfer of interests in the real estate, does not mean that the owner will not abide by zoning regulations. So the statement is FALSE.
The property owner must abide by zoning regulations, deed, or subdivision restrictions and covenants. The owner must not infringe on the public welfare with the use of the property.Otherwise, a property in fee simple means that the owner can:
do whatever he likes with the propertyuse the property sell the property to another personrent it out instead of outright saleallow heirs to inheritand ownership is not limited in time.Thus, ownership of property in fee simple confers the highest ownership right in real estate.
Learn more about property in fee simple at https://brainly.com/question/17276804
A legal definition of stay
How did this supreme court decision affect judicial interpretations of the constitution?.
Hello! If a synovial ganglion (cyst) bursts due to a sudden movement or blow, does it reappear?
Answer:
This is a tricky one. If it bursts than there is a high risk on infection. However, there is a chance it will happen again, especially if the area is not properly cleaned after bursting and if the gunk isn't cleaned up. It could be dangerous if it is an internal cyst, so please be careful.
It takes 4 level scoops of coffee grounds to make 10 cups of coffee. how many level
scoops of coffee grounds are needed to make 15 cups of coffee?
You would need 6 level scoops of coffee grounds to make 15 cups of coffee based on the given ratio.
How many level scoops of coffee grounds are needed to make 15 cups of coffee if it takes 4 level scoops to make 10 cups?If it takes 4 level scoops of coffee grounds to make 10 cups of coffee, we can use this ratio to determine the number of scoops needed for 15 cups.
We can set up a proportion:
4 scoops / 10 cups = x scoops / 15 cups
To solve for x (the number of scoops needed for 15 cups), we can cross-multiply:
4 * 15 = 10 * x
60 = 10x
Dividing both sides of the equation by 10:
x = 6
Learn more about coffee grounds
brainly.com/question/30061164
#SPJ11
The end result of rescinding the contract is
Answer:
It is sometimes called “cancellation” or “overturning”. The word rescission comes from the word “rescind” which means to cancel or annul. The purpose of contract rescission is to restore the parties to their original status before the contract was made (the “status quo ante”).
Explanation:
James is excited to obtain employment at a large practice in the suburbs. The position is titled assistant release of information technician. James is responsible for obtaining appropriate patient release of information to process requests for information from third parties (e.g., payers, attorneys, providers, and so on). James is also responsible for applying all state and federal laws to the release of protected health information (PHI). The training about the practice’s policies and procedures for appropriately releasing patient information included the following requirements:
Validate a patient’s signature by comparing it to a patient-signed document in the patient record (e.g., consent to treatment, assignment of benefits).
Explain to requestors that the practice requires ten days to process such requests for information.
Contact the patient, if necessary, to verify that someone other than the patient has permission to obtain copies of patient records.
James arrived at work eager to learn as much as possible about the new position and to actually be working in the profession. The team leader, Teresa, went on lunch break at a time that is normally busy for the release of information section. At first it was quiet, and James reviewed notes about official policies and procedures related to the release of information. Then, James felt ready to answer any questions in the absence of the team leader.
James heard a person walk to the front counter. The person was older, quite well dressed and very tall. The person said they were there to pick up the spouse’s patient records. James was able to find the records and made copies of them. Upon review of the release of information signed by the patient, it appeared that the patient had authorized the spouse to pick up the records. Prior to handing over the copies of the record, James asked the person for identification for verification purposes. The person said the wallet was in the car. The person was impatient and muttered that it was ridiculous since everything was signed and in order. The person grabbed the manila envelope containing the copies of the patient records out of James’ hand and quickly left. James was quite distraught over this incident.
When Teresa returned from lunch and saw that James was upset, James told her what happened. Teresa’s face dropped. "You are never supposed to give out patient records without a valid patient authorization and photo identification."
1.) What steps to the practice's release of information policy and procedure did James forget to follow?
2.) How should Teresa handle the situation, based on James having inappropriately released patient information?
1) James forgot to follow the step of verifying the person's identification for verification purposes before handing over the patient records.
2) Teresa should handle the situation by addressing the incident with James, providing guidance on the correct procedures, and taking appropriate measures to mitigate any potential harm resulting from the unauthorized release of patient information.
In the given scenario, James, in his role as an assistant release of information technician, made copies of patient records for a person claiming to be the spouse of the patient. However, James failed to follow the practice's release of information policy and procedure by not verifying the person's identification before handing over the copies of the records. Verifying the identification is crucial to ensure that patient information is only disclosed to authorized individuals.
Teresa, as the team leader, should approach James in a supportive manner, acknowledging his distress over the incident. She should emphasize the importance of patient confidentiality and the significance of following the established protocols. Teresa should explain to James that verifying patient authorization and photo identification is a vital step in protecting patient privacy and complying with state and federal laws governing the release of protected health information (PHI).
To address the situation, Teresa should provide additional training to James, focusing on the correct procedures for verifying patient identification. This training should include examples and scenarios to help James understand the potential risks associated with unauthorized disclosure of patient information. Teresa should also ensure that James fully comprehends the practice's release of information policy and procedures, emphasizing the need for adherence to these guidelines at all times.
Furthermore, Teresa should take appropriate measures to rectify the situation and mitigate any potential harm resulting from the unauthorized release of patient information. This may involve reporting the incident to the appropriate authorities within the practice, such as the privacy officer or compliance department, and following any necessary protocols for managing breaches of patient confidentiality. Teresa should also work with James to ensure that he feels supported and capable of performing his role in accordance with the established policies and procedures.
Learn more about scenario
brainly.com/question/33629578
#SPJ11
2. Relatively few drivers are touched by the
traffic crash problem, either directly or
indirectly. TRUE OR FALSE
Answer:
F
Explanation: