Why is it important to know how to write well as a Criminal Justice Professional or Law Enforcement Officer

The term that refers to customs, traditions, judicial decisions, and other materials that guide courts in decision-making but have not been enacted by legislatures into statutes is common law.

Common law is a legal system that relies on judicial decisions and customs rather than written statutes. It is based on precedent and the principle of stare decisis, which means that courts should follow the decisions of higher courts in similar cases. Common law is developed through the accumulation of court decisions over time and is considered binding on future cases with similar facts. It provides guidance to judges in interpreting and applying the law when statutes or legislative provisions are not explicit or applicable. Common law plays a significant role in legal systems such as those found in England and the United States, where judicial decisions and legal principles derived from historical practices contribute to the body of law.

Learn more about Common law here: brainly.com/question/543705

#SPJ11

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I think.

Answer: is not legally required to disclose the homicide to the potential buyers.

Explanation:

Homicide simply means when someone is killed by another person. While some homicides are justifiable, others aren't.

If a homicide occurs on a particular property and due to this reason, the property will be sold, it's not legally required for the person selling the house to tell the potential buyers that a homicide occured there.

Therefore, Kelly is not legally required to disclose the homicide to the potential buyers.

Answer: hello the options related to your question is missing below is the missing option

a. not further a legitimate local interest.

b. not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out-of-state interests.

c. allow only direct, not incidental, regulation of interstate commerce.

d. impose costs on interstate commerce that are more excessive than necessary to bring about the state interests.

answer:

Not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests

( B )

Explanation:

The state statue must not discriminate in favor of local interests and against out of state interests,

The commerce clause as enshrined in the constitution during the Tenth amendment does not grant  the power to the states to regulate interstate economic activities without discrimination.  it also serves as a grant power to congress, hence the states where granted powers to regulate interstate commerce

Answer: In general, a scientific law is the description of an observed phenomenon. It doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it.

Answer:

Scientific laws or laws of science are statements, based on repeated experiments or observations, that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena. The term law has diverse usage in many cases across all fields of natural science

Explanation:

hope this helps

Answer:

Is this a True or false if so.. it's true??

Explanation:

Before a court can exercise jurisdiction over a defendant, the court must have proof that the defendant was properly notified of the lawsuit. Delivering the summons and complaint to the defendant is referred to as: the service of process.

The service of process is the procedure by which a party to a lawsuit is provided with legal notice of a case against them, including the summons and complaint. This involves the physical delivery of these documents to the defendant or to someone else who is authorized to receive service on their behalf.

Service of process is a crucial step in initiating legal proceedings and is necessary to establish the jurisdiction of the court over the defendant. Without proper service, the court cannot proceed with the case, as the defendant must have the opportunity to respond to the allegations made against them.

To know more about jurisdiction, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/10377896#

#SPJ11

Answer:

C) because when you give a warranty its collateral if the product is lost, breaks, and ect that why you pay a little extra money

The correct answer is judicial activism that acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent.

According to the legal theory of "judicial activism," courts can and must consider societal effects in addition to the law that applies when making decisions. It is occasionally used in defiance of court restraint.

It refers to a judge deviating from precedent and relying more heavily on their own convictions while rendering decisions. Politicians disagree on both the overall concept of judicial activism and specific activist judgements.

Additionally, they contend that the judiciary invalidates the actions of both elected and unelected officials, including sometimes legislative acts that reflect the viewpoint of the momentary majority at the time of passage rather than necessarily the viewpoint of the momentary majority at the time the legislation is invalidated.

To find similar questions related with  'judicial activism'

visit- https://brainly.com/question/509532

#SPJ4

The Bill of Rights, which refers to the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution, can be changed under specific circumstances. There are two primary methods for amending the Bill of Rights are Formal Amendment Process and Judicial Interpretation.

Formal Amendment Process: The formal amendment process requires a proposed amendment to be passed by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. After that, the amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. This process has been used to amend the Constitution in the past, including the addition of the 27th Amendment.

Judicial Interpretation: The Bill of Rights can also be changed through the process of judicial interpretation by the Supreme Court. Over time, the Court's interpretations of the Bill of Rights have shaped and evolved the understanding of individual rights. Landmark cases, such as Brown v. Board of Education and Obergefell v. Hodges, have expanded and redefined constitutional rights based on evolving societal norms and values.

It is important to note that the principles and protections outlined in the Bill of Rights are generally considered fundamental and enduring. However, they can be subject to change through the formal amendment process or through the interpretation and application of the Constitution by the courts.

Know more about Bill of Rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/493206

#SPJ8

Answer:

A few sec. to a min

Explanation:

Answer:

at least a minute starting from a second

Explanation:

Option C. Physician practices these entities is considered a covered entity.

A covered entity, as defined by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States, refers to certain organizations or individuals that are required to comply with HIPAA regulations in order to protect the privacy and security of individuals' health information. Out of the entities listed, the one considered a covered entity is Physician practices

Physician practices, including individual doctors and medical groups, are generally considered covered entities under HIPAA. These entities provide medical services directly to patients and handle protected health information (PHI) as part of their regular operations. PHI includes any individually identifiable health information, such as medical records, treatment history, and health insurance information.

Consultants, billing agencies, and accountants, on the other hand, are not automatically considered covered entities under HIPAA. While they may come into contact with PHI in their work with healthcare providers, their status as covered entities depends on the specific circumstances and the nature of their relationship with the healthcare organization.

If these entities perform functions or activities that involve the use or disclosure of PHI on behalf of a covered entity, they may be considered "business associates" under HIPAA and would need to comply with certain requirements to protect PHI.

It is important to note that the determination of whether an entity is a covered entity or a business associate under HIPAA can be complex and may require a case-by-case analysis. Organizations should consult legal and regulatory experts to ensure compliance with HIPAA regulations based on their specific roles and responsibilities.

Know more about  PHI here:

https://brainly.com/question/14423306

#SPJ8

Answer:

Theft

Explanation:

Capital punishment has long sparked heated debate about its morality as well as its impact on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment can be divided into three categories: moral, utilitarian, and practical.

Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder have forfeited their right to life because they have taken the life of another. Furthermore, they believe that capital punishment is a just form of retribution.

In contrast, opponents of capital punishment argue, citing Cesare Beccaria's writings that capital punishment is counterproductive in terms of the moral message it conveys because it legitimizes the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing.

To know more about Capital punishment here

https://brainly.com/question/28180014

#SPJ1

The result of a contract in which both parties are wrong about a material fact of the contract, voidable.

What is contract?

An agreement between two or more people to do something is referred to as a contract. Two or more parties must agree to the terms of the agreement in order to create a legally binding commitment. A contract was the deal with the two parties are the agreed to the terms and the conditions.

According to the contract act are the based on the mutual conditions are the based to the contract are the valid. They are the based on the mutual terms and the conditions are the add. But, they are the contract, voidable for the reason of the contract in both parties are wrong about a substance.

As a result, the result of a contract in which both parties are wrong about a material fact of the contract, voidable.

Learn more about on contract, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2669219

#SPJ2

It is false that if a restriction imposed by the government is content-neutral, then a court will not allow it.

Content-neutral regulations are those that apply to all expressions without taking into account their message or substance.

Such prohibitions frequently only regulate the place, time, and manner of speech, as opposed to laws that restrict speech based on its content. This distinction is critical in First Amendment challenges because content-based legislation is subject to intense scrutiny, the highest level of judicial review, but content-neutral legislation is only subject to intermediate, or mid-level, assessment.

Because many content-based laws are overturned and many content-neutral laws are upheld by the courts, the distinction frequently has an impact on how a case turns out.

Reviewing courts usually look at whether the government meant to repress expression when it established the law to assess whether the statute is content-based or content-neutral.

To learn more about content-neutral, click below:

https://brainly.com/question/30691182

#SPJ4

Answer:

dang, thanks for free points tho

Explanation:

Answer:

Free answer dude-

Explanation:

False. The doctrine of res judicata concerns the effect of a final judgment on subsequent legal proceedings.

When several jurisdictions are involved in a case, the applicable law is determined by the choice of law rules of the forum where the case is being heard. In cases where multiple jurisdictions are involved, it is often necessary to determine which jurisdiction's law should apply to the dispute. This is typically done through a choice of law analysis, which involves weighing various factors to determine which jurisdiction has the most significant relationship to the dispute.

The doctrine of res judicata, on the other hand, is a legal principle that precludes parties from relitigating issues that have already been decided in a previous final judgment. It is not relevant to determining which jurisdiction's law applies to a case.

Therefore, while the doctrine of res judicata is an important legal principle, it is not directly related to the determination of applicable law in cases involving multiple jurisdictions.

learn mor about res judicata at :

https://brainly.com/question/29925560

#SPJ4

Explanation:

đáp án C

The following statement is FALSE "parents are not always liable if they hit their children."

Regardless of the parent-child relationship, physical discipline that harms a child can be regarded as child abuse or assault in most jurisdictions. In general, the law acknowledges that parents have a responsibility to protect their children's safety and wellbeing as well as their right to be protected from physical harm.

The general idea that parents can be held liable for harming their children through physical discipline remains true, even though there may be variations in particular laws and legal defenses in different jurisdictions. Prioritizing non-violent methods of discipline is crucial as is looking for substitute techniques to control kids behavior and foster their emotional and physical wellbeing.

Learn more about parent-child relationship at:

brainly.com/question/15441200

#SPJ4

Answer:

Garratt V. Dailey

1. What are your impressions of this case?

2. Did the court get this one right?

3. Should the law apply to this little boy as it does an adult? If you don't think it should, where do you draw the line? Think thoroughly through your answer to that question, keeping in mind that once a court sets precedent, it must be followed. If you say little Brian Dailey shouldn't be held liable if under the evidence he is proved to have the requisite intent, how do we make sure people like Ms. Garratt are compensated for injuries of this type. In the case of Garratt v. Dailey, the court decided not to apply the "tender years" doctrine and held Brian liable for his actions. However, it's important to note that this case represents only one instance and may not set a precedent applicable to all situations involving young children.

When determining legal liability for young children, it is crucial to consider their cognitive and emotional development, capacity to understand consequences, and the circumstances surrounding the incident. Drawing a clear line can be challenging, but it's important to strike a balance between holding individuals accountable for their actions and considering their age and capacity for intent.

Regarding compensation for injuries, it is possible to explore alternative avenues to ensure that victims like Ms. Garratt are compensated without placing full legal liability on young children. These could include insurance coverage, public assistance programs, or other means of addressing the needs of the injured party.

It is important to remember that legal systems evolve, and precedents can be revisited or modified based on new understanding and societal values. The balancing act between accountability and the recognition of the unique circumstances of young children will likely continue to be a subject of debate within legal and ethical contexts.

A board that is elected in a classified system is known as a "classified board." In this structure, the board members are divided into separate classes, with each class serving staggered terms. This ensures continuity in the board's leadership and decision-making processes while allowing for democratic representation through regular elections.

A board that is elected in a classified system is known as a governing board. These boards typically consist of individuals who are elected by the community or appointed by the government to oversee the operations of a particular organization or institution. The board members are responsible for setting policies, making strategic decisions, and ensuring that the organization is operating effectively. In a classified system, the board may also be responsible for managing classified information or confidential matters. A governing board typically consists of a set number of members, and decisions are made through a voting process.
To know more about classified board visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23013010

#SPJ11

Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:

Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/14620330

#SPJ1

Answer:

DNA can be used to identify criminals with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. ... In cases where a suspect is identified, a sample of that person's DNA can be compared to evidence from the crime scene. The results of this comparison may help establish whether the suspect committed the crime.

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Corpus delicti; referring to the principle that a crime must be proved to have occurred before a person can be convicted of committing that crime.

Answer:

Being a member of your community and having a say in how choices are made is what citizenship entails. Natural rights and equality are granted to all citizens at birth. Citizens should take advantage of this opportunity to express their opinions and have a voice in governance.

Covert and overt surveillance is conducted in the case of criminal investigations.

Investigations into industrial crime, insurance fraud, and other criminal activities frequently involve the use of covert and overt surveillance as a helpful and effective method for learning more about an individual or organization.

In contrast to overt surveillance, which uses technologies that are evident and visible, covert surveillance is conducted without the target's awareness.

The finest outcomes are always given by utilizing a variety of approaches, such as mobile surveillance, static observation, and the deployment of covert surveillance equipment. All of our agents have years of experience, are highly competent, and have backgrounds in the police or military. Trademark surveillance agents are trained to utilize specialized tools, like hidden body cameras and GPS tracking systems.

Therefore, Covert and overt surveillance are conducted in the case of criminal investigations.

Read more about surveillance, here

https://brainly.com/question/14895186

#SPJ1