help me with this question

On a printed copy of the Declaration of Independence, Mary Katharine Goddard's name can be seen. "Mary Katharine Goddard, the Declaration of Independence's Female Signatory."

On a printed copy of the Declaration of Independence, Mary Katharine Goddard's name can be seen. She was a printer for the Continental Congress but neither a signer nor a man. The majority of the signers' names were initially included in the Declaration of Independence that she had printed in Baltimore in January 1777.

The Declaration of Independence declared British rule in the United States to be over. On July 4, 1776, the colonies ratified the Declaration of Independence. It said the British government did not respect the rights of the colonists. It stated that a decent government must uphold citizens' rights.

To learn more about Mary Katharine Goddard refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/24608342

#SPJ13

Answer:

"Loud"

Explanation:

To complete this exercise, you have to indicate which word or phrase may help determine the meaning of "amplified".

The correct answer is "loud" because to amplify means to increase something, in this case, the guitar's volume, so the volume is louder.

Answer:

Keep Memorizing all the factures and concepts of the speech topic and memorize it at least 10 times a day

Answer:

A metaphor is a direct comparison between two things

Explanation:

Just in case you need this, a simile uses like or as. :)

Answer: what’s the question?

Explanation:

Answer:

We round the corner and finally I notice what is happening. Randy just snatched Chad's notebook. He's hurrying this way. He doesn't spot us. Slam. The table strikes the floor. So does Randy. I see a streak of red on his face. Blood starts gushing from his nose.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Mercedes Sosa, a prominent Argentine folk singer and activist. These lines express a sense of loss, sorrow, and the pain experienced by her defeated race at the hands of another civilization.

In these lines, Mercedes Sosa refers to the "white people" who took something away from her, symbolized by the mention of the "little charango," a traditional stringed instrument commonly associated with Andean music. This loss represents a broader historical and cultural displacement experienced by her people, highlighting the impact of colonization and the dominance of one civilization over another.

The phrase "defeated race cries" suggests the profound sadness and anguish felt by the marginalized and oppressed community. The sense of defeat and pain reflects the historical injustices and struggles faced by indigenous peoples and minority groups throughout history.

To learn more about Andean music visit: brainly.com/question/32364842

#SPJ11

Answer:

I love cheese. I eat it on everthing. I even eat cheese without any thing. Cheese is to me, like Noah to his ark. Our stories wouldn't be complete without each other. I am a vegan now, but I still love cheese. It doesn't taste as good, but I still need my cheese.

Explanation:

first person point of view means the writer is using personal pronouns like I, we, us, my, our, mine.

~theLocoCoco

The passage uses several metaphors to describe a group of people. They are compared to "red dirt and pine trees," which suggests a strong, natural foundation.

They are also likened to "fireflies in jelly jars," which conveys a sense of brightness and energy that is contained and cherished. Similarly, "lemon-chiffon ice cream cones" evoke a feeling of sweetness and pleasure.

The group is also associated with "laughter on hot city nights," "hot milk on cold city mornings," "good food and good times," "fancy dancing," and "soul music," all of which contribute to a sense of joy, comfort, and community. Finally, the group is described as "family," which ties all of these qualities together and suggests a strong bond of love and support.

More on metaphors: https://brainly.com/question/27250460

#SPJ11

Answer:

What is the underlined word?

Answer:

Industrialization has knit the world together -not just in having wrought profound technological change, but also in the consequences, both economic and social, of that change. Industrialization allowed for the mechanization of Euro-American societies and the mass production of commodities and finished goods. At the same time, industrialization facilitated the destruction of local environments all over the world with pollution and resource depletion. Industrialization also provided the means by which Europeans, Americans, and the Japanese dominated cultures and societies around the globe through both formal and informal imperialism. As a result, the "progress" of the nineteenth century should be viewed globally, with truly global consequences that still challenge the planet and its peoples.

Writers use transitions to connect ideas, explain a counterclaim, and provide facts. Correct answer: letter B.

Transitions help writers to move logically from one idea to the next, and to make sure that the reader can easily follow the flow of the text. Transitions also help to provide context and support for the reader, making it easier to understand the writer's argument.

When a writer makes an argument, they are attempting to persuade their reader to accept a particular point of view. This is usually done by presenting evidence that supports the writer's viewpoint, as well as by refuting any opposing arguments. The writer may also use rhetorical devices, such as analogies, to make their point more effectively. An effective argument is one that is well-reasoned and logically sound, and one that is based on evidence and facts rather than opinions or bias.

Learn more about argument:

https://brainly.com/question/29633080

#SPJ4

Yasmin could have determined the meaning of "monocracy" as being related to "ruling" through contextual analysis, word roots, etymology, comparative analysis, or prior knowledge and research.

Contextual Analysis: Yasmin could have encountered the term "monocracy" within a particular context or sentence that provided clues to its meaning.

By analyzing the surrounding words and phrases, she might have inferred that "monocracy" refers to a system or form of government where one person holds absolute power or authority, hence relating it to "ruling."

Word Roots and Etymology: Yasmin could have examined the word's components and roots. "Mono" typically denotes "one" or "single," while "-cracy" pertains to "rule" or "government." By combining these elements, she could have deduced that "monocracy" refers to the rule by a single individual.

Comparative Analysis: Yasmin might have compared "monocracy" to similar terms or concepts she was already familiar with. For example, if she knew about "democracy" as a system of government by the people, she could infer that "monocracy" refers to the opposite, where power is concentrated in the hands of a single ruler.

Prior Knowledge or Research: It is also possible that Yasmin had encountered the term "monocracy" before or had engaged in prior research related to governance systems. Through her existing knowledge or deliberate investigation, she might have learned about "monocracy" as a form of government emphasizing the rule of one.

To learn more about monocracy

https://brainly.com/question/3710038

#SPJ8

The word "DESTRUCTIVE" consists of three syllables and is pronounced as "dɪˈstrʌktɪv".

It is constructed using a consonant-vowel-consonant-vowel-consonant-consonant-vowel structure. Syllables can be defined as the building blocks of words. In linguistics, it is the smallest unit of sound that has linguistic importance. Each syllable is composed of an onset, nucleus, and coda and the onset is the consonant sound at the beginning of the syllable. The coda is the consonant sound at the end of the syllable.

Each syllable is separated by a period or dot (.) in the phonetic representation of a word. In "DESTRUCTIVE", the first syllable "de-" begins with a voiced consonant /d/ followed by a vowel /ɪ/. The second syllable "-struc-" starts with a voiceless consonant /s/ followed by a vowel /ʌ/. The third syllable "-tive" begins with a voiceless consonant /t/ followed by a vowel /ɪ/ and ends with two consonants /v/ and /ɪ/.

/dɪˈstrʌk.tɪv/

              DESTRUCTIVE

                 /              \

               /                  \

             /                      \

           /                          \

       DESTR                UCTIVE

      /    \                         /    \

     /      \                       /      \

   /         \                     /        \

  /           \                   /          \

 /             \                 /            \

To learn more about consonant click here https://brainly.com/question/30309881

#SPJ11

Answer: The tone of the passage is "optimistic". The words "But she was ready, firm in her goal: She would nail this interview" imply that even after having some trouble, she managed to ignore it and continue. This contributes to the overall meaning of the passage by making the reader understand that obstacles may appear on your journey, but optimism helps you achieve your goals.

Explanation: The passage is written with an optimistic tone. A tone in a passage is responsible of transmitting the necessary feelings and ideas to the reader, in this case, after knowing all of the unfortunate events, and reading the words: "But she was ready, firm in her goal: She would nail this interview", the reader infers that the woman did not care about them, because she would still have a successful interview.

Answer:

Roosevelt appeals to the emotions of the audience by proposing a compromise between the Soviets and other nations on human-rights issues.

Answer:

Progress decay

Explanation:

In 1830, President Andrew Jackson addressed to the Congress in an attempt to relocate the eastern Native American tribes to land west of the Mississippi River. On his message, Andrew Jackson talked about separating Native Americans and free them from the power of the States. The term that has the most negative connotation in his message was "progress decay" assuming that the decay of the Native American community is imminent but separating them will help them by "enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own ru*de institutions; will ret*ard the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers".

Have a great day :D sorry if I'm wrong!

Answer:

first answer is D and the second is A

Explanation:

the second answer is A because its telling you directly that she doesn't want to work

Answer: D. Short-answer and essay questions

Answer:

who is watler dean myers

Answer:

To teach swindle a lesson for trying to take advantage of him and his best friend.

Explanation:

Swindle is a story written by Gordon Korman. It is a children's story about the retrieval of a vintage baseball card. Griffin and his best friend Ben finds a vintage baseball card worth trillions of dollars in an old house but they were stiffed of the money by a swindler called Palomino. So they made plans to retrieve the card when the found out its worth.

Irrespective of the fact that the baseball card cost a fortune, they also wanted to teach Palomino a lesson for swindling them.

The answer to your question is informal. The use of the phrase "it can't hurt to try" is colloquial and typically used in casual conversation.

The tone is relaxed and there is no need for any formal language or structure. This sample is often used when offering a suggestion or solution, but with the understanding that it may not be successful. The speaker is simply suggesting that the listener attempt the solution, without any guarantees. It is important to remember that this sample is not a guarantee of success and should not be relied upon as such and is simply a suggestion to try something out, even if the outcome may be uncertain. In summary, the use of "it can't hurt to try" is an informal way to offer a suggestion without making any guarantees, and should be used appropriately depending on the context.

To learn more about informal click here https://brainly.com/question/28881743

#SPJ11

Hume's problem with inductive reasoning suggests that all inductive reasoning rests on a premise for which there is no evidence: that the unobserved instances resemble the observed instances.

Hume's problem with inductive reasoning highlights a fundamental issue regarding our ability to make predictions based on past observations. Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning that involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations. For example, if we observe the sun rising every day, we may conclude that the sun will continue to rise tomorrow. However, Hume argues that this reasoning is inherently flawed because it relies on the assumption that the future will resemble the past.

Hume points out that we have no direct evidence to support this assumption. While we may have observed certain instances in the past, we cannot be certain that the future will follow the same pattern. The problem lies in the fact that inductive reasoning assumes a level of uniformity in nature, assuming that unobserved instances will resemble the observed instances. But without any direct evidence, this assumption becomes unjustified.

It is important to note that Hume's criticism of inductive reasoning does not suggest that we should abandon it entirely. Instead, he raises a cautionary note, reminding us to be aware of its limitations. While inductive reasoning is a useful tool for making predictions and forming beliefs, we should recognize that it is not foolproof. It is subject to uncertainty and the possibility of unobserved instances deviating from the observed ones.

In the realm of science, experts strive to mitigate the shortcomings of ordinary inductive reasoning by employing rigorous methodologies, such as controlled experiments, statistical analysis, and peer review. These practices aim to minimize bias, establish causality, and increase the reliability of inductive conclusions. While scientists and other experts may employ more rigorous reasoning processes, Hume's problem with inductive reasoning remains relevant, reminding us to approach our conclusions with a degree of skepticism.

Since the question is incomplete, the complete statement is shown below:

"Select All That Apply. Consider Hume's Problem With Inductive Reasoning. It Suggests The Sun Will Not Rise TomorrowAll Inductive Reasoning Rests On A Premise For Which There Is No Evidence: That The Unobserved Instances Resemble The Observed InstancesOrdinary Reasoners, But Not Scientists And Other Experts, Often Reason SloppilyWe Do Not Know That The Sun

Select all that apply. Consider Hume's problem with inductive reasoning. It suggests

The sun will not rise tomorrow

All inductive reasoning rests on a premise for which there is no evidence: that the unobserved instances resemble the observed instances Ordinary reasoners, but not scientists and other experts, often reason sloppily

We do not know that the sun will rise tomorrow."

Learn more about inductive reasoning

brainly.com/question/1490615

#SPJ11

Inglés

"The Road to El Dorado" is an animated adventure film that follows the story of two Spanish con artists, Miguel and Tulio, who accidentally end up on a ship bound for the New World. They arrive in South America and stumble upon the legendary city of gold, El Dorado, where they are mistaken for gods by the locals. Miguel and Tulio begin to enjoy their newfound wealth and status, but their greed soon leads them down a dangerous path as they try to maintain their facade and avoid being caught by the Spanish conquistadors who are also searching for the city of gold.

The pursuit of material objects is a central theme in "The Road to El Dorado." Initially, Miguel and Tulio are driven by their desire for wealth and luxury, and they are willing to lie, cheat, and steal to get what they want. However, as the story progresses, they begin to develop a deeper appreciation for the things that truly matter in life, such as friendship, love, and the well-being of others. They realize that their pursuit of material objects has led them down a destructive path, and they eventually choose to prioritize the happiness and safety of the people of El Dorado over their own personal gain.

In contrast, the Spanish conquistadors who are also searching for El Dorado are portrayed as ruthless and single-minded in their pursuit of wealth and power. They are willing to kill and enslave the natives of South America in order to obtain gold and other valuable resources. The difference between the main characters and the Spanish conquistadors lies in their priorities and values. While Miguel and Tulio eventually learn to prioritize human connection and compassion over material possessions, the Spanish conquistadors remain fixated on their quest for wealth and conquest, regardless of the harm they cause to others.

In conclusion, "The Road to El Dorado" highlights the dangers of materialism and the importance of prioritizing human connection and compassion over personal gain. Miguel and Tulio's journey towards self-discovery and their eventual realization that true happiness cannot be bought with gold serves as a powerful reminder that our pursuit of material objects should not come at the expense of our values and relationships.

Español

The Road to El Dorado" es una película animada de aventuras que sigue la historia de dos estafadores españoles, Miguel y Tulio, que accidentalmente terminan en un barco con destino al Nuevo Mundo. Llegan a América del Sur y se topan con la legendaria ciudad de oro, El Dorado, donde los lugareños los confunden con dioses. Miguel y Tulio comienzan a disfrutar de su nueva riqueza y estatus, pero su codicia pronto los lleva por un camino peligroso mientras intentan mantener su fachada y evitar ser atrapados por los conquistadores españoles que también buscan la ciudad de oro.

La búsqueda de objetos materiales es un tema central en "El Camino a El Dorado". Inicialmente, Miguel y Tulio están motivados por su deseo de riqueza y lujo, y están dispuestos a mentir, engañar y robar para conseguir lo que quieren. Sin embargo, a medida que avanza la historia, comienzan a desarrollar una apreciación más profunda de las cosas que realmente importan en la vida, como la amistad, el amor y el bienestar de los demás. Se dan cuenta de que su búsqueda de objetos materiales los ha llevado por un camino destructivo y finalmente eligen priorizar la felicidad y la seguridad de la gente de El Dorado sobre su propio beneficio personal.

En contraste, los conquistadores españoles que también buscan El Dorado son retratados como despiadados y decididos en su búsqueda de riqueza y poder. Están dispuestos a matar y esclavizar a los nativos de América del Sur para obtener oro y otros recursos valiosos. La diferencia entre los personajes principales y los conquistadores españoles radica en sus prioridades y valores. Mientras que Miguel y Tulio finalmente aprenden a priorizar la conexión humana y la compasión sobre las posesiones materiales, los conquistadores españoles siguen obsesionados con su búsqueda de riqueza y conquista, independientemente del daño que causen a los demás.

En conclusión, "The Road to El Dorado" destaca los peligros del materialismo y la importancia de priorizar la conexión humana y la compasión sobre la ganancia personal. El viaje de Miguel y Tulio hacia el autodescubrimiento y su eventual comprensión de que la verdadera felicidad no se puede comprar con oro sirve como un poderoso recordatorio de que nuestra búsqueda de objetos materiales no debe hacerse a expensas de nuestros valores y relaciones.

A statement that is formulated as a conditional sentence but does not achieve the intended result is said to be a false conditional sentence.

An example of a false conditional sentence for which the converse is true:

(a) If it is raining, then the ground is wet. (Converse: If the ground is wet, then it is raining. True.)

An example of a false conditional sentence for which the converse is false:

(b) If the sky is blue, then it is sunny. (Converse: If it is sunny, then the sky is blue. False.)

An example of a false conditional sentence for which the contrapositive is false:

(c) If the temperature is below freezing, then it is cold. (Contrapositive: If it is not cold, then the temperature is not below freezing. False.)

An example of a false conditional sentence for which the contrapositive is true:

(d) If the grass is green, then it is healthy. (Contrapositive: If the grass is not healthy, then it is not green. True.)

To learn more about conditional sentence link is here

brainly.com/question/29770846

#SPJ4