The Mayflower Compact
Upon arriving in the Americas, the Pilgrims realized they were not where they were supposed to be. They had planned on arriving in Virginia, but a storm had knocked them off course. Instead, they were in what today is called Massachusetts. There was no sign of English life around them.
Many of the voyagers took this as a sign that they could start their own nation and that this nation would not be subject to English law. Fearing anarchy, members of the “Saints,” the Puritans who had left England for religious reasons, set out to bind the new settlement in a form of law. The result was the Mayflower Compact.
The Mayflower Compact was written by the leaders of the Saints. The document was then signed aboard the Mayflower by about two-fifths of the ship’s 101 passengers. Only men were able to sign it, as only men had legal powers under English law. Servants were also banned from signing legal documents. However, both Saints and non-Saints, who were also called Strangers, agreed to the Compact's terms in the end and produced signatures affirming so.
The document has three main points. First, it states that the colony being formed is part of “Northern Virginia” and is being founded in the name of God and King James. Second, it states that the colony is subject to Christian and English law. Third, it states that the settlers themselves will enter into “a civil body politic” and will make just and equal laws for “the good of the colony” but only “from time to time.”
The last point is the most important. It establishes the first motion toward democracy and republicanism among the English settlers in America. Though the colonists affirm that they are still subjects of the king, they also express the need to make local laws, since there was no organized government in Plymouth (the eventual name of their settlement). That local government would not be led by a king, but rather by a democratic union of individuals. These individuals would together decide what things were for “the good of the colony.” A scant 150 years later, the rest of the colonies would bind together in a similar union and reject the king altogether.
Question: The author suggests that the Mayflower Compact is important because it was:
A) the first treaty amongst the English in America that declared complete freedom from the English government
B) a document that would greatly influence later Americans to rebel against the king of England
C)the first document establishing a democratic government for the English in the Americas
D) a binding treaty with the king of England that allowed the Pilgrims to formally separate from the Church of England
Answers
the first document establishing a democratic government for the English in the Americas.
The Mayflower Compact, signed by the Pilgrims in 1620, was a significant document that established a democratic form of government for the English in the Americas. The Compact was created as a means of ensuring order and unity among the Pilgrims who had landed in Plymouth, Massachusetts, without a royal charter.
The document was a social contract that established a government based on the consent of the governed. It was signed by 41 adult males, who agreed to abide by the laws and regulations created by the government they had established. The Compact established a system of majority rule, with each member of the community having an equal voice in the decision-making process.
The Mayflower Compact was important for several reasons. First, it was the first document to establish a democratic form of government in the English colonies in America. This was a significant departure from the autocratic rule that was prevalent in Europe at the time. Second, the Compact set a precedent for future American documents, such as the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution, which also established democratic forms of government.
Finally, the Mayflower Compact was important because it demonstrated the Pilgrims' commitment to creating a new society based on principles of self-government and religious freedom. These ideals would become the foundation of American democracy and would inspire future generations of Americans to fight for their rights and freedoms.
for more such questions on The Mayflower Compact
https://brainly.com/question/17960705
#SPJ11
Related Questions
direct vs. representative democracy roman
Answers
In a representative democracy, legislators are chosen by the people to vote on their behalf while legislation are being proposed. In a direct democracy, each topic is put to the people's vote. The primary distinction between the two systems is who gets to vote on laws: citizens or elected officials.
how did Darwin’s theory of evolution influence william james’ theory of functionalism
Answers
William James's theory of functionalism states that cognitive mental skills are a consequence of adaptations that enhance the fitness (survival rate) of an individual.
What is Darwin's theory of evolution?Darwin's theory of evolution states that organisms evolve (change) in order to survive certain environmental conditions, which is achieved by the slow process of natural selection.
William James's theory of functionalism is associated with a Darwinian perspective because it states that cognitive skills represent adaptative traits to survive to the environment.
In conclusion, William James's theory of functionalism states that cognitive mental skills are a consequence of adaptations that enhance the fitness (survival) of an individual.
Learn more about Darwin's theory here:
https://brainly.com/question/1589147
#SPJ1
Which problem did Britain face at the end of the French and Indian War?
Question 2 options:
keeping colonists out of the Native American lands west of the Appalachian Mountains
establishing laws for the colonists who moved west
finding colonists who were willing to settle west of the Appalachian Mountains
dividing western lands into new colonies
bro plz.
Answers
Answer:
A. keeping colonists out of the Native American lands west of the Appalachian Mountains
Explanation:
It's Correct!
There are the keeping colonists out of the Native American lands west of the Appalachian Mountains are the problem did Britain face at the end of the French and Indian War. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is war?
The term “war” means argument, conflict, and fighting between two countries, states, or social groups. The different causes of war. The huge wartime involvement of the military and weapons The war is divided into different categories: absolute war, agonistic fighting, and instrumental war.
Britain was a more dept because causes of fighting of French and Indian War. The parliament are rises in the tax are bad impact on Britain. The colonist is the Native American of the west land in the end of the French and Indian War. French and Indian war the Britain spent the million of money to military, weapons, and other sources.
As a result, the keeping colonists out of the Native American lands west of the Appalachian Mountains are the problem did Britain face at the end of the French and Indian War. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on war, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ2
¿ Cuál es la importancia de los Hermanos Flores Magón
en la historia del México Pre-revolucionario ?
Answers
Answer:Ricardo Flores Magón (nacido el 16 de septiembre de 1873 en San Antonio Eloxochitlán, Oaxaca, México; fallecido el 21 de noviembre de 1922 en Leavenworth, Kansas, Estados Unidos), reformador y anarquista mexicano que fue un precursor intelectual de la Revolución Mexicana.
Flores Magón nació de padre indígena y madre mestiza. Se involucró en el activismo estudiantil mientras estudiaba derecho en la Ciudad de México. Fue encarcelado por primera vez en 1892 por liderar una pequeña manifestación contra la reelección del dictador mexicano Porfirio Díaz. Pronto se unió a un pequeño grupo de reformadores liberales, con quienes fundó la revista Regeneración en 1900. Flores Magón fue encarcelado dos veces por sus actividades radicales con el grupo, y el gobierno suprimió Regeneración en 1901. Tras su tercer arresto en 1903 por oponerse el gobierno de Díaz, Flores Magón y varios de los otros radicales huyeron a Estados Unidos. Después de sobrevivir a un intento de asesinato en Texas, Flores Magón se mudó con el resto del grupo a St. Louis, Missouri, donde establecieron formalmente el Partido Liberal Mexicano (Partido Liberal Mexicano; PLM) en 1905 y reanudaron la publicación de Regeneración. Flores Magón se convirtió en el líder más visible del PLM.
Aunque los funcionarios estadounidenses inicialmente vieron a Flores Magón como un problema mexicano, los agentes del gobierno de los EE. UU. Pronto compartieron un interés con los funcionarios mexicanos en procesarlo por sus escritos subversivos. Luego de campañas armadas del PLM y una crisis económica en 1907, el gobierno mexicano contrató al detective privado Thomas Furlong para capturar a Flores Magón con la esperanza de extraditarlo a México. Aunque Furlong pronto lo atrapó en Los Ángeles, el gobierno mexicano no pudo asegurar su extradición. En cambio, fue juzgado y condenado en Arizona por conspiración para violar las leyes de neutralidad y fue sentenciado a 18 meses de prisión.
Explanation:
Which statement best expresses the main idea of the passage below?
Peru has three distinct geographic regions:
Cold, mountainous Sierra
Dry coastal plain
Warm, forested selva
The ways people live in these regions are very different. For example, many people on the coastal plain live in cities, while most people in the Sierra live in small villages.
A. Peru’s Sierra is mountainous and cold
B. Peru’s geography affects the lives of it’s people.
C. There are no cities in Peru’s Sierra region.
D. Peru’s geography is not varied.
Answers
Answer:
Peru’s geography affects the lives of it’s people.
Explanation:
ans maybe correct
This man is using German money as wallpaper. What does the photo suggest about the German economy? German money was worthless. German walls were safer than banks Germany stopped using paper money. Germany stopped producing wallpaper
Answers
Answer:
German money was worthless
Explanation:
According to the given image, a man is shown using German money as wallpaper. The photo suggest that the German economy and money was worthless.
As a result of the Treaty of Versailles which mandated GERMANY to pay reparation fees to countries it had damaged during the World War after their unconditional surrender, it put their economy into great decline and made their money worthless essentially.
Answer:
German money was worthless
Explanation:
edg 2021
Uno de los elementos de desarrollo cultural que realizaron de forma común Aztecas, Mayas e Incas fue:
Answers
Question 8
What is one reason why nationalism in Arab countries spread in the Middle
East during and after World War I?
A. Arabs hoped to end the persecution and anti-Semitism they faced
in Europe during this period.
B. Arabs hoped to modernize their countries by adopting European
ideas and political philosophies.
C. Arabs wanted to create independent states where Muslims,
Christians, and Jews could live together.
D. Arabs in the region wanted to gain independence from the Turkish
leaders of the Ottoman Empire.
Answers
Answer: D. Arabs in the region wanted to gain independence from the Turkish leaders of the Ottoman Empire.
Explanation: Because the Ottoman Empire needed more independence then they were originally getting from the Turkish leaders.
are there any time where fred hamptons speaches have cause riots
Answers
Answer:
Fred Hampton, a prominent activist, and leader in the Black Panther Party, was known for his powerful speeches advocating for social justice and equality. While his speeches were influential and mobilized many individuals, there is no documented evidence to suggest that his speeches directly caused riots.
It's important to note that Hampton's activism and speeches were focused on addressing systemic issues of racism, poverty, and inequality, and promoting community organizing and empowerment. However, he faced intense scrutiny and surveillance from law enforcement agencies, which eventually led to his assassination in 1969.
While his speeches may have been seen as provocative by some, it is important to recognize that riots or violent actions that may have occurred during that time were often a result of broader societal tensions, systemic oppression, and a response to ongoing racial injustices, rather than directly caused by Hampton's speeches alone.
explaining the process by which the federal government prepares a budget and makes spending decisions ?
Answers
Policymakers use the federal budget process to establish spending priorities and to determine who will pay for those activities. Those decisions affect the lives of all Americans, as well as the nation’s economy. The size and scope of those decisions make the budget process one of the most important and complex exercises in public policymaking.
What impact did Philip II and Louis XIV have in their country? Answer pleaseee
Answers
Answer:
During of both of this rulers these countries were absolutistic monarchies.
Moreover, both countries were at the peak of their strength and development, and were regarded as the greatest forces in Europe.
Explanation:
Both of them created large and strong armies. Philip's focus was on the development of navy - the famous Armada, while Louis created a strong army, that during his reign was strongest in Europe.
Although they were absolutists, both leaders, which is interesting were supporters and patrons of art.
PLEASE HELP ME I WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
2. For the first hundred years of the United States, only white males were able to vote. Since then, amendments to the Constitution have made it so that any citizen aged 18 or older can vote. Which amendments granted different groups the right to vote? Why were amendments needed to expand voting rights
Answers
Answer: Amendment 19 gave women the right to vote
Amendment 23 allowed the people of Washington D.C. the right to be able to vote
Amendment 24 abolished poll taxes used to prevent black people from voting
Amendment 26 lowered the voting age to 18 years
Explanation: the amendments were made because the nation was expanding, changing, and through this bringing more equal rights to all people, allowing more equality.
How does Equiano describe the kind of slavery he knew in Africa? How does it compare with the plantation slavery of the Americas?
Answers
The correct answer to this open question is the following
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
Equiano described the kind of slavery he knew in Africa as slavery that resulted from the wars, which means that slaves were considered prisoners of war and were used as slaves. The other form of slavery was the result of punishment when people committed crimes.
On the Other hand, the plantation slavery of the Americas? was the result of the slave trade in which African people were sold to work in the Americas. Africans were "packed" in ships. The overcrowded spaces made diseases spread quickly and many Africans died in inhuman conditions.
Olaudah Equiano's narrative shows slavery in the interaction among the peoples of Africa and Europe and how this impacted the course of slavery.
This reflects the way slaves were treated during those horrible years of slavery and the Slave Triangle that traded African slaves to the Americas. In 1789, Olaudah Equiano wrote the book "The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African," which describes his memories of being treated as a slave since he was 11 years old.
What was Abraham Lincoln's dilemma during the civil war?
Answers
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
british prime minister who went to war against germany
answer: winston churchill
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
winston churchill
the proposal for popular sovereignty called for deciding the issue of slavery in the territories through a
Answers
The proposal for popular sovereignty called for deciding the issue of slavery in the territories through a vote or referendum.
This means that the people living in the territories would have the power to decide whether or not to allow slavery in their region.
Popular sovereignty was an idea that emerged during the mid-19th century in the United States. It was a belief that the people should have the ultimate authority to determine the laws and policies that govern them.
In the context of the issue of slavery, popular sovereignty was seen as a compromise between the North and South. It allowed for the possibility of new territories to decide whether or not to permit slavery based on the will of the majority of its residents.
This idea was particularly important during the time when the United States was expanding westward. As new territories were being acquired, the question of whether slavery would be allowed in these areas became a contentious issue. The proposal for popular sovereignty aimed to give the power of decision-making to the people living in these territories.
For example, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 implemented popular sovereignty in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska. This act repealed the Missouri Compromise and allowed the residents of these territories to vote on whether or not to allow slavery. This led to a significant amount of conflict and violence between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the region.
Overall, the proposal for popular sovereignty sought to address the issue of slavery by giving the power of decision-making to the people living in the territories. This allowed for a more democratic approach to determining the future of slavery in these areas, but it also led to significant tensions and conflicts.
Learn more about referendum from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/31168258
#SPJ11
The U.S. Constitution creates
Help !!
a government with:
A. dozens of small branches that compete for power.
B. a powerful president and a weak Congress.
C. three branches that have roughly equal power.
D. a group of judges who make and enforce all laws.
Answers
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Three branches that have roughly equal power, and perform checks and balances on each other.
Three branches that have roughly equal power (:
The table shows the military casualties of World War I.
Soldiers
Soldiers
Killed
All
Casualties
Wounded
Great Britain
908,371
2,090,212
3,190,235
Germany
1,773,700
4,216,058
7,142,558
France
1,547,800
4,266,000
6,160,800
United States
116,516
204,002
323,018
Which conclusion can be drawn from this chart?
O The number of casualties were small compared to the size of the countries involved.
O France suffered the greatest number of casualties because it did the most fighting.
The war resulted in many casualties for all of the countries that participated.
O Great Britain had the greatest number of casualties because it fought the longest.
Answers
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
B is totally wrong as France surrendered in the middle of war after occupation of Paris.
Britain was also suffering of support of US was not came they have been lost .
Option C is correct as the world war was equally harmful to all the participants
France gave up the war while it was still going on after taking over Paris. The US's backing for Britain was lacking because they had left. Option C is appropriate because everyone who participated in the battle suffered injury.
What happened in World War I ?It should be emphasized, based on the evidence provided, that disease and malnutrition contributed to an increase in civilian mortality during World War I.
The first global conflict, known as World War 1, lasted from 1914 until 1918. It was brought on by Ferdinand Franz's murder.
It should be mentioned that disease and malnutrition contributed to an increase in civilian casualties during World War I. Civilian casualties during this time period outnumbered military casualties.
Its adversaries mostly consisted of the Ottoman Empire, Europe, the Russian Empire, and the United States. Fighting broke out in several countries of Asia, the Pacific, Africa, the Middle East, and Europe.
Learn more about World War I here
https://brainly.com/question/25919875
# SPJ 2
What made the battle of antietam the single bloodiest day in american history? responses the largest armies ever were amassed in one place. The largest armies ever were amassed in one place. Confederate troops unexpectedly used guerilla tactics. Confederate troops unexpectedly used guerilla tactics. Union troops outnumbered confederate troops 2 to 1. Union troops outnumbered confederate troops 2 to 1. Troops marched forward against newer, more accurate weapons
Answers
The battle of Antietam was the single bloodiest day in American history union troops outnumbered Confederate troops 2 to 1. option (C) is correct.
The battle of Antietam (likewise referred to in southern historiography as the clash of Sharpsburg) was the main major equipped showdown of the American nationwide conflict that occurred in the northern domain. The fight occurred on September 17, 1862, close to Sharpsburg, in Washington Region, Maryland, US, and nearby the Antietam stream.
The battle was essential for the Maryland Lobby and is the bloodiest throughout the entire existence of the US that was battled in a solitary day, with very nearly 23,000 casualties.
Learn more about American history:
https://brainly.com/question/796956
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
What made the battle of Antietam the single bloodiest day in american history?
(A) responses the largest armies ever were amassed in one place. The largest armies ever were amassed in one place.
(B) Confederate troops unexpectedly used guerilla tactics. Confederate troops unexpectedly used guerilla tactics.
(C) Union troops outnumbered confederate troops 2 to 1. Union troops outnumbered confederate troops 2 to 1.
(D) Troops marched forward against newer, more accurate weapons
Why did the Renaissance begin in Europe?
Please help me.
Answers
Answer:
The Renaissance started because of increased wealth, greater cultural exchange, and a renewed interest in classical works and philosophies. ... This sparked the Renaissance, a period cultural and artistic renewal that challenged established ways of thinking and eventually spread throughout Europe.
Suggested Format
Introduction (3 to 5 sentences)
Give a brief introduction of the basis for the Cold War. What was it about? Who
was involved?
Answer the following yes or no question as your thesis: Were principles of
liberalism violated during the events of the Cold War?
Answers
Explanation:
Which of the following is not recorded as one the enormous advancements of the 20th century scientific revolution?
a.
Genetic engineering
b.
Biotechnology
c.
Herbicides resistance
d.
Telescope
1. made from nothing
evolution
2. moral and mental likeness to God
Genesis
3. free choice
Eve
4. means living
created
5. where God placed Adam & Eve
image
6. first book of the Bible
voluntary
7. gradual development to higher form
garden of Eden
Answers
Answer:
Created - made from nothing
Image - moral and mental likeness to God
Voluntary - free choice
Eve - means living
Garden of Eden - where God placed Adam & Eve
Genesis - first book in the Bible
Evolution - gradual development to higher form
Answer:
1. created - made from nothing
2. voluntary - free choice
3. garden of Eden - where God placed Adam & Eve
4. Eve - means living
5. Genesis - first book of the Bible
6. evolution - gradual development to higher form
7. image - moral and mental likeness to God
Explanation: God was satisfied with man and enjoyed his friendship. True friendship is based on choice. For two people to be friends, they must both choose to be friends. One other very important truth about man is that God created him to be able to choose. He told Adam he could not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil because he would die. God gave man his first law to be voluntarily obeyed. Adam had the free choice to obey God and live in complete fellowship or to disobey God (sin) and suffer death--the choice was his to make. So God created man and woman with His blessing. Adam then called his wife's name Eve; that is, "Living," because she was to be the "mother of all living" (the human race).
El tumulto trastocaba la cabeza para admirar los rostros pálidos que tenían
de semillas color azul incrustadas en las cavidades. Saboreaban la belleza
fluyente de un celeste-sombrio, porque detrás de ese pigmento natural
había un peculiar ver.
Cada paso que daban polemizaban un espectáculo para los que se perdían
descubriendo la clave para obtener un par de ojos del mismo tipo.
Answers
Este texto parece ser una descripción poética y surrealista de una escena en la que un grupo de personas están admirando algo que tiene semillas azules incrustadas en sus cavidades. Parece que estas semillas tienen un efecto hipnótico en las personas que las contemplan, ya que "el tumulto trastoca la cabeza" de quienes las ven.
What is the Spanish text about?La descripción también sugiere que detrás del pigmento azul oscuro hay un misterioso significado o belleza oculta que solo algunos pueden comprender. Parece que cada paso que dan las personas que miran estas semillas es como una discusión o debate sobre lo que están viendo y tratando de descubrir cómo obtener un par de ojos "del mismo tipo".
En general, el texto parece ser una meditación sobre la percepción y la comprensión de la belleza y el significado en el mundo que nos rodea, y cómo diferentes personas pueden interpretar y experimentar las mismas cosas de maneras muy diferentes.
Learn more about Spanish from
https://brainly.com/question/26522612
#SPJ1
created after the end of the 2nd world war formed with the purpose of overcoming intolerance, deception, and aggressive military behavior in the self-interest of rogue nations. its preamble promotes fundamental human rights for all people. What is this called?
Answers
A war of aggression, sometimes also known as a war of conquest, is a military confrontation that is fought without the excuse of self-defense, typically for territorial gain.
Provide a definition of aggression.
Aggression, according to social psychology, is any behaviour or action intended to hurt another person, an animal, or physical damage to property. Here are a few examples of unfriendly behaviour: physical acts of violence. harsh language, yelling, and screaming. providing false information or disparaging a classmate.
bodily acts against another person, such as striking, kicking, beating, or stabbing. Property damage can also be a sign of physical animosity. vocal, which includes yelling, insulting, and making fun of others. Relational, which seeks to sabotage another person's relationships.
Know more about territorial Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21152582
#SPJ1
What were characteristics that pulled the Greek city-states apart?
Choose all answers that are correct.
1. loyalty to the polis
2. different languages
3. trips to the agora
4. separation by land and sea
5. culture within the city-state
Answers
Answer:
I think its 1, 4, and 5...
Answer: Loyality to the polis, diffrent languages, separation by land and sea.
Explanation: Give me the brainiest
What is the answer to the red herrings on the mystery Cardiff ( if you read the story) ela
Answers
In literature, the definition of red herring refers to a misleading, or false, clue. It is a common literary device used in mysteries and thrillers that can lead readers down a false path or otherwise distract them from what's really going on in the plot.
Therefore, the correct answer to the red herrings on the mystery Cardiff is just to ignore the red herring as it could be misleading. It could be misleading because it is known as a ploy to mislead the readers or listeners as it said to be a misleading, or false, clue.
What informs of red herring?This red herring consists in diverting attention from the real issue by focusing instead on an issue having only a surface relevance to the first. A red herring is a logical fallacy in which irrelevant information is presented alongside relevant information, distracting attention from that relevant information. This may be done intentionally or unintentionally. A red herring is often used in movies, television and literature.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about red herring: https://brainly.com/question/3966814
#SPJ1
loyalists who did not leave the country were quickly reintegrated into american society. true/false
Answers
The statement that loyalists who did not leave the country were quickly reintegrated into American society is partly true and partly false.
While it is true that many loyalists who remained in the country after the American Revolution were eventually accepted back into American society, the process of reintegration was not always quick or easy. In the aftermath of the Revolution, loyalists who had supported the British monarchy often faced suspicion and hostility from their fellow Americans. Some were even subjected to violence or forced to flee their homes. However, over time, attitudes began to shift as Americans sought to rebuild their communities and reunite the fractured nation. Loyalists who had not actively fought against the Revolution or committed other egregious offenses were often able to return to their homes and resume their lives.
That being said, the process of reintegration was not always smooth. Loyalists often faced social and economic marginalization, with many losing their property and livelihoods. They also had to navigate a complex system of oaths and pledges to prove their loyalty to the new American government. Furthermore, some loyalists chose to leave the country voluntarily rather than risk persecution or continue to live in a society that did not fully accept them. In conclusion, while loyalists who remained in the country after the American Revolution were eventually reintegrated into American society, the process was not always quick or easy, and many loyalists faced significant challenges and hardships along the way.
Learn more about Revolution here: https://brainly.com/question/10287362
#SPJ11
8.
The NAACP found its greatest successes in the fight
against segregation:
A
In Congress
B
In state legislatures
C Through appeals to the President
D
In the courts
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
just look at them now that is how they have helped and funded BLM
helpppp plsssss 30 pointssss
what would happen based on the pontiac chief's speech
Answers
Answer:
Chief Pontiac's Speech - UMBC

Chief Pontiac's Speech. It is important for us, my brothers, that we exterminate from our lands this nation which seeks only to destroy us
it will destroy
it will happend so dont doit
DESPERATE!! WILL GIVE BRAINLLIST AND THANKS FOR CORRECT ANSWER
True or False: The period of presidential reconstruction led by President Andrew Johnson resulted in a south that wasn't very different than it had been before the Civil War.
False
True
Answers
Answer:
FALSE
E
HOPE THIS HELPS HAVE A NICCE DAY xplanation: